The pick-six affliction
Curious for general thoughts here. I'm not a particularly astute X's and O's guy, but I'm wondering if there's anything specific to a quarterback's decisionmaking that makes a team more prone to giving up the pick-six. Obviously at this point it's a huge problem for us: one vs Auburn, one vs Fla, a near-miss vs South Carolina returned to about the 5, and two vs UGA.
I can't recall anyone I've watched in college having this problem, but off the top of my head I recall that in the NFL it was a problem for Drew Bledsoe, at least later in his career, and I *think* it became a problem for Kurt Warner in his Giants and early Arizona years.
I acknowledge 10 players on the field other than the QB are also accountable on an INT return, but I wonder whether the odds of a pick-six are increased with a QB's taking a little more risk in his throws, being a little more aggressive, perhaps trying to force it into a spot which has a higher likelihood of a defender there moving towards the ball rather than backpedaling. I have no idea and I could be spouting pure garbage here, but when it's been an acknowledged problem coming into the game and then we toss up two more, it just begs the question of whether there's an underlying fundamental issue which gives rise to so many of these?
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Also,
Letting a guy break on a ball such that he gets it at a dead run towards the end zone helps a lot. He’s got the advantage on the pursuit and he just has to beat the lumbering offensive line, for the most part. Do this on the outside part of the field, and unless he’s starting from WAY downfield, it’s pretty much a given that he’ll get to the end zone. He’ll be heading for the end zone with no one in front of him and the pursuit way behind.
Richard Pittman
by Richard Pittman on Oct 26, 2008 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Gamble's two TDs
I’m a Georgia fan, so I can’t give a good answer for what happened in LSU’s other games, but I did notice a couple of things about UGA’s two pick sixes on Saturday. On the first, it initially appeared as though the #2 receiver on the left side was left uncovered, and Lee obviously saw this and was looking that way. However, UGA’s safety, CJ Byrd, inverted and covered down on the receiver moments before the snap, causing Lee’s eyes to go inside and stare down that receiver during the entire play. Gamble saw Lee’s eyes, and made a good jump on the ball to get the INT and TD. It was a bad mistake, by a young QB, but at least you could tell he was trying to go through his progression.
I believe the second of Gamble’s TDs was a combination of desperation by Lee, and UGA being in the right coverage at the right time. I’ll have to go back and look at the game, but I believe we were in one of our nickel packages (3-3-5 or 3-5-3, but I’m not sure). We were in an odd number coverage, so Gamble would go into a 2 seam drop if he were covered down a receiver, which he was. At about 15-20 yards the linebacker is supposed to break off coverage, and pass the receiver onto the safeties and look for any underneath routes. Lee threw to the seam receiver that Gamble was covering right as he was passing off coverage responsibility to the safety. This not only gave him a great jump on the ball, but it ensure that the nearest LSU player was behind him and very blockable. Had Lee, thrown the ball a little bit earlier or later, the ball would have fallen innocently to the turf.
I apologize for my long-winded explanation of everything, and I also apologize if anything seems horribly incoherent. It’s 2am in Athens right now. Anyway, best of luck Tigers. Ya’ll have a bright future ahead of you, and Lee will develop into an excellent QB once he learns to look off receivers and not force the ball.
GO DAWGS!
Sic 'em Dawgs
by ClassicCityDawg on Oct 27, 2008 1:02 AM CDT reply actions

by 















