Les Miles' Reputation as a Scary, Crazy Dude
Everyone knows Les Miles is an idiot. Everyone knows Les Miles is crazy. (But see this.) Everyone knows Les Miles doesn't understand the concept of punting. Everyone knows that Les Miles is unhinged, one cross word away from tackling Tracy Wolfson.
But as much as "everyone knows" these things, his reputation for being a wild man is a relatively new one. Read this article in the LSU Reveille, dated November 6, 2006, precisely halfway into Les Miles' tenure as LSU head coach:
But the third and most shocking was LSU coach Les Miles has an emotional side.
Miles gave officials an ear full Saturday in Knoxville, Tenn., and he even got a sideline warning.
CBS sports commentator Tracy Wolfson got a question cut off by an explosive Miles after halftime.
Thank goodness it wasn't me, but I still had tears in my eyes from sympathy pain for Wolfson - it happens to the best of us.
But the tears were there, more importantly, because it's the closest Miles has resembled former coach Nick Saban since the almighty skipped out of Baton Rouge after the 2004 season....
After the shock wore off, one question still remained. Why the sudden change of attitude?
After being accused of being a "soft coach," Miles said at his press conference after the University of Kentucky game that there were a lot of things that made him tick.
Can it be? After Les Miles had been here for a season and a half, he was being accused of softness. Him showing an emotional side was "shocking". Now, less than 2 years later, Miles has apparently cemented a reputation as a hot-head who can't keep his mouth shut.
I recall quite distinctively that a lot of LSU fans, myself included, wondered if he had any personality at all in the first year or so he was here, and that interview with Tracy Wolfson (YouTube not available, sadly) was indeed shocking, because it seemed so out of character. Now, after another press conference in close proximity to a game against Tennessee and numerous other incidents, Miles' reputation has gone to the other end of the spectrum. At least among his detractors.
Part of it is because, yes, his public persona changed. I think in large part that has to do with his becoming a little more comfortable as LSU coach, which was a position of considerable natural difficulty early in his tenure.
As an aside, I am ambivalent about Miles' behavior with Wolfson. On the one hand, it was really aggressive. On the other hand, if you want to ask football coaches tough questions at halftime of a game they are losing, don't hide behind a skirt and feign wounds to your feminine delicacy. For what it's worth, Miles apologized later, and Wolfson didn't shrink from him then, and hasn't shrunk from him since. She was tough enough for the task of asking angry coaches the tough questions, and it was other members of the chattering class who were offended on her behalf.
But I digress.
It really sometimes seems as though nothing in Les Miles' career happened before that Wolfson interview, and little happened before Nick Saban was hired at Alabama. T. Kyle King can ruminate on whether Les Miles understands that punting is a sometimes-essential element of football tactics, which is fine. It's funny, and far too gentle to really get upset about, but before last year Les Miles didn't have any kind of a history of using untraditional 4th down tactics.
Could it be that Miles decided that he had a great short-yardage back and a very good offensive line and decided, rationally, that this meant it was in his advantage to take more chances on 4th and short? Could it be that Les Miles examined the strengths of his team and decided, for the 2007 season, that this was a way he could get the most out of what he had?
One might be tempted to think that, given that the previous two years of the Miles tenure did not include any particularly noteworthy or memorable 4th down risks. The answer to the question above, of course, is no. Les Miles did not in any way make a rational decision that his team was well-suited to have success on 4th and short. Instead, he simply threw up his hands and said, "We're going for it!" and got lucky. After all, he's Les Miles, who is obviously an idiot, and thereby incapable of rational, original thought.
Snarkiness aside, Miles is a guy whose reputation perplexes me. For what it's worth, I think he is an emotional guy. I think he is also given to taking calculated risks, but always calculated. Never foolish. He's a poker player, and a poker player who takes foolish risks isn't a poker player long, unless he has a lot of money stashed away. As for his occasional peculiar comment at a press conference, I will just say that his well-publicized elbow to the Bama ribs is certainly no worse than Spurrier commenting on the spelling of "Citrus". And yes, a lot of people love(d) to hate Spurrier in part because of his attitude of superiority, but I don't think it was a reputation-defining moment for him.
0 recs |
5
comments
Read Related
Comments
Great read Richard...
I went to all the links and read the comments. Even joined a few boards along the way.
I think Miles is a very good coach. Everyone loves to hate a winner when you’re the loser on the other end of the scoreboard. And more often than not that has been the case for the hate. It means we’re sucessful and I’m enjoying all the comments about our coach.
Let ‘em talk and please Les, keep us all smiling.
by Totally Spoil on Jul 24, 2008 8:12 AM CDT 0 recs
Actually, refusing to punt is very rational. It’s been a hobbyhorse of statistical football analysts for quite sometime: teams shouldn’t punt as often as they do. While I highly doubt Miles has read any Pete Palmer, he does seem to understand the general theory: punting from your own 40 on 4th and short is not really a great decision, it’s just the one coaches have always made. It’s the stratgey of choice because coaches are, as a lot, fairly risk adverse. But going for it may cost you some points, but it will likely pick you up more points as well. Punting from midfield is probably only wirth about 20-30 yards of field position. Big whoop.
It’s also odd to criticze a guy for going for it on fourth a lot when he was more often than not successful. People are so risk adverse that even when the riskier strategy WORKS, it is roundly criticized.
by Poseur on Jul 24, 2008 12:36 PM CDT 0 recs
I really don't know why...
...everyone got their panties in such a bunch over Miles’ comments about Alabama. First off, he was right (as Saban himself pointed out today at media days), and when you’ve never personally lost to a team it’s not only your right, but also your patriotic duty, to talk a little good natured shit about them. I think the most ludicrous part of it was the accusations that Miles doesn’t have any class because of it. Bryant joked about Auburn on numerous occasions, and we all think of him as the epitome of class in football (that’s not to say he wasn’t, because he did a lot of classy things you don’t see anymore like visit the other teams locker room to congratulate them on their victory when he lost). I know I’ve said some negative things about Miles and I still think the jury is out on whether or not he can do better than a two loss season, but so long as he’s got that kind of record and is competing for the league and the MNC year in and year out, you can’t argue too much over whether or not he’s doing a good job at LSU.
by Todd on Jul 24, 2008 10:32 PM CDT 0 recs
For the record . . .
. . . I wasn’t really questioning Les Miles’s strategy, any more than I was really questioning Houston Nutt’s sanity or Tommy Tuberville’s ethics. (O.K., I was really questioning Tommy Tuberville’s ethics, but, then again, I hate Auburn.)
Coach Miles--of whom I have been a critic, but to whom I gave public credit for his coaching acumen after last year’s national championship season—did go for it on fourth down a lot last year, which was the source of my joke. That doesn’t make his decisionmaking wrong (although I believe his postgame comments following the Auburn win made it clear that he didn’t know how many seconds were left on the clock, so going for the touchdown rather than the field goal was a tactical error that worked out rather than a good call), but it does make it subject to good-natured ribbing.
I don’t think you took it the wrong way or anything, Richard, but I wanted to make it clear to any of your readers who didn’t follow the link what I was, and was not, saying. For what it’s worth, I have (through a link to Brian Cook’s “Sign on the Line That is Dotted” posting following L.S.U.’s win over Florida, which unquestionably was the result of bold yet sound decisionmaking by Coach Miles) cited Coach Miles as an example of what I hope we Georgia fans will see from Mark Richt this year, when the Bulldogs’ placekicking is suspect but the Red and Black’s offense ought to be sound; namely, a greater willingness to take calculated risks and go for it on fourth down.
Les Miles is a fine coach. Like all coaches in the Southeastern Conference, though, his attributes are exaggerated by the level of scrutiny he receives. His reputation is no more or less an undeserved caricature than Urban Meyer’s or Nick Saban’s or Phillip Fulmer’s. This is the time of year to bring the funny, because, when the football starts in five weeks, the serious business begins as my team begins its quest for a successful season against a daunting slate littered with outstanding coaches who have won championships at the Division I-A and Division I-AA level, including Chris Hatcher, Paul Johnson, Steve Spurrier, Phillip Fulmer, Urban Meyer, Dennis Erickson, Nick Saban, and, yes, Les Miles.
On a more personal and positive note, Richard, I don’t know that I’ve formally welcomed you to the neighborhood since you made the move to SB Nation, but you’re doing fine work and I’m proud and pleased to have you as a colleague. I’m looking forward to good-natured partisan exchanges between us prior to Georgia’s and L.S.U.’s gridiron clashes in Baton Rouge and in Atlanta this fall.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Jul 25, 2008 8:43 AM CDT 0 recs
Oh believe me T. Kyle, I got no problem with you
If I had a problem with you, I’d probably just ignore you. And I’m glad to be here. And one thing you’ll probably recognize about me, eventually, is that I’m not really a partisan. One of the first principles I follow is to acknowledge that all of us are rooting for laundry. It’s just a question of which laundry.
Oh, and nice to see you expect us to get to Atlanta this year. I think our chances are decent, and it should all come down to whether LSU can end the Auburn streak. By the auburn streak, I am of course referring to the 75 consecutive year streak of the home team winning that particular game.
Richard Pittman
by Richard Pittman on
Jul 25, 2008 8:48 PM CDT
up
0 recs

















