It's Finally Game Week - Time to Bloviate, Part 2
Two days ago, we profiled the first six games on the SEC schedule for this week. Then Poseur did a follow-up. No one pointed out that he misspelled "amok", however. Today, we go through the last six, which has perhaps the most interesting matchup of the entire first week of the season regardless of conference. And perhaps the 2nd most interesting matchup as well.
Saturday, 6:00pm Central: Memphis vs. Ole Miss, no television
This is not a bad matchup, and I'm disappointed it's not on TV. It's more exciting than Vandy vs. Miami (OH), and more exciting than MSU vs. La Tech, but oh well. We do without.
I have gone on record as saying that I think Ole Miss will be a solid team this year. Their first opportunity to embarrass me will come in this game. These two teams play every year, and Ole Miss has won the last 3, but they've always played it tough. Memphis is another of those teams that seems perpetually on the verge of being halfway decent, but never quite getting there.
This is a matchup of two teams that apparently feature rather good line play on both sides of the ball. Some of Ole Miss's better linemen will miss the game with injuries, but if this Ole Miss team is ready to step up like I think, they should discard Memphis rather easily.
Houston Nutt will get all the credit, but don't forget that Coach Orgeron put this team together personnel-wise.
Saturday, 6:00pm Central: Western Illinois at Arkansas, no television
This is the stinkiest matchup of the week, as projected cellar-dweller Arkansas takes on FCS competition, and not even particularly good FCS competition. Nothing will be learned about either.
Saturday, 6:00pm Central: Louisiana-Monroe at Auburn, no television
The storyline for this game started last year, when ULM shocked Bama in what is probably the biggest win in its history. It was simply a matter of Bama not showing up to play, as they were in the middle of an epic late-season collapse. ULM didn't really look all that good in the game. They were simply good enough to beat a team that looked like it wanted to be anywhere other than on a football field that particular day.
With ULM having beaten Bama, Auburn sets up some mild bragging rights, as they figure to easily trounce the Warhawks. If this game was to be televised, you could get an early look at Auburn's new offense, and for that matter their new defense. This is a game where they could work out the biggest and knottiest of the kinks, but the real tests come later.
Saturday, 7:00pm Central: Bama vs. Clemson, neutral site, ABC
Easily the most interesting matchup in the SEC, or rather, it's the most interesting matchup that occurs before Monday. In my opinion, a Monday college football game hardly even counts.
I'll be honest as I have been this whole offseason. I think Bama is overmatched in this game. Clemson has playmakers all over the offense, and Bama has to put together a front seven almost from scratch. I'll tell you, I wouldn't want to go against James Davis and CJ Spiller if I was starting 3 new linebackers including at least one true freshman. To make matters worse, Clemson is not strictly a running team, as they also have a quarterback and a receiver who would probably be All-SEC if they played in the SEC.
Glimmers of hope for Bama include the fact that Clemson has to break in a mostly new offensive line, but one wonders if Bama has the playmakers on the defensive line to take advantage.
In addition to its explosive offense, Clemson has a very solid defensive unit as well, if you believe CFN. While I do not always agree with CFN, in the absence of better information, I tend to go with them.
The line on this game has remained close all offseason, but unless Clemson has a brain cramp, they appear to be clearly the better team right now. It's never a good thing for the present to be highly reliant on incoming freshmen, and the pain will start here. I think if Bama wins, it would be a very big upset. I'm not saying it's impossible, but either Bama would have to be much better than I expect, Clemson much worse, or some strange confluence of events would have to combine to make this happen.
Oh, and if you want to get WAYYY too into the science of it all, check out this post at another site.
Sunday, 2:30pm Central: Kentucky at Louisville, ESPN
This matchup is not what it used to be. No wait. It really is what it used to be. It used to be a matchup of an average team against one of the worst teams in the SEC. That's exactly what it is again.
I am not a believer in Kentucky. I think they went a long way with a group of player s who were seniors last year and are now gone and all but forgotten. Andre Woodson, Jacob Tamme, Keenan Burton, Steve Johnson, and Raphael Little made up the core of Kentucky's best offense since Tim Couch was in town. Heck, these guys might have been better than that group, but they're all gone. The defense returns some starters, but is missing its best player from last year, LB Wesley Woodyard.
Louisville, for what it's worth, is coming off one of the most monumentally disappointing seasons in college football in 2007. I am only mildly interested in this matchup.
Monday, 7:00pm Central: Tennessee at UCLA, ESPN
Why is no one talking about this game? Here we have the defending SEC East champs traveling all the way to the west coast to play a pretty decent team. We have the debut of the golden boy, Rick Neuheisel, at UCLA and the hoped return to prominence for that franchise.
Tennessee is just a criminally underhyped team this year. They appear to be solid all around, and they're coming off a solid season. They have one of the best running backs on the conference and a very strong offensive line. They have good receivers and the best defensive back in the conference. No one talks about them.
I'll be watching this game to see if I'm right about Tennessee.
0 recs |
6
comments
Read Related
Comments
Tennessee
No one pointed out that he misspelled “amok”, however.
Richard, it’s just that we expect so much more from you than Poseur.
On Tennessee, I think the uncertainty about them is a combination of new quarterback and offense and the absolute hose job the SEC scheduler gave them. Crompton is certainly more experienced than anyone we’re going to put on the field this year, but both Florida and Georgia have familiar faces at that position.
I also wouldn’t be shocked to see Tennessee in the SEC East race, but they’re going to have to overcome the fact that Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and Kentucky all have bye weeks before the Tennessee game. I can just as easily see them going 1-3 through that stretch, and that doesn’t include their matchup at Auburn. My personal prediction for them is 8-4, with 3 SEC losses.
by The Bengal on Aug 27, 2008 9:42 AM CDT 0 recs
Why do people think UT will lose to UCLA?
UCLA is no good and they are on their 3rd string QB for the game, a JC transfer who’s been in the program for a few months. There is no uncertainty in my mind about UT’s QB after the way he torched us in 2006 as a Freshman.
I’ve got UT finishing 2nd in the east behind Florida. Their O-line is sick, they just don’t allow sacks. The bye week situation is ridiculous, but when UT is starting a RB who will become their all time leading rusher after week 4 this year (ahead of guys like Jamal Lewis and Hearst, etc.) I’ve got to think they’ve got a good chance to win every game they play.
by LSU Jonno on
Aug 27, 2008 12:55 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I’m stunned anyone would expect anything from me.
There’s a reason Pittman doesn’t let me near those podcasts. It would be bad if we gave the impression you could only expect my level of half-assed analysis.
by Poseur on
Aug 27, 2008 5:47 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Great work on this 2 part preview
Unlike in years past, I’m excited for many of the actual games of the opening week this year. I think the regional(ish) ACC-SEC matchups make a whole lot of sense.
No one pointed out that he misspelled “amok”, however.
Is it fair, then, to point out that you incorrectly placed the comma in that sentence outside of the quotation marks? Unless the Brits have subsumed Tuscaloosa and imposed their punctuation on y’all. If so, then nevermind.
Kentuck Arts Festival: October 18th.
Details at Sinful Savage Tigers
by Man Mountain on Aug 27, 2008 2:53 PM CDT 0 recs
I usually try to follow British spelling and punctuation
Plus, unless it’s a direct quote, as in, "I like eggs, " said Marvin Hagler, I think the comma goes on the outside. If you’re using the word to represent the word itself, rather than as the meaning of the word, I think the comma goes outside.
Richard Pittman
by Richard Pittman on
Aug 27, 2008 5:14 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Not so
American punctuation is still stubbornly governed by conventional 19th century printing standard rather than the contextual logic the Brits use. The word used as a quotes word does not absolve the comma from its place within the closed quotation, except, oddly, when the entirety of the quoted material is a single number or letter.
Thankfully, all of this will soon be pointless considering students have decided to stop using punctuation at all.
Kentuck Arts Festival: October 18th.
Details at Sinful Savage Tigers
by Man Mountain on
Aug 27, 2008 7:11 PM CDT
up
0 recs

















