College Football Does Not Have Coronations
In case you missed it, USC lost last night. The sound you're hearing is millions of college football fans cackling in maniacal glee because, let's face it, the only thing more fun than a star is a fallen star.
If you've ever wanted to know why I don't make predictions, last night's upset of USC by Oregon State is a perfect illustration of the reason. No one would have thought that a team that lost to Stanford and to Penn State by a combined 39 points would be able to keep up with the team that pasted Ohio State.
But college football is a funny game. One team can beat a vastly superior team if they play on an emotional high and if the superior team does not play their best game. There are so many variables involving preparation, psychology, momentum, crowd energy, young players stepping up, and in-game injuries that can make for some very strange results.
I've heard it said, and I believe it, that a college football team can play over its head if it plays with emotion. I've also heard it said that you can only do this about 3 times a year, because you just can't get up for a game more often than that. The other 9 to 11 games in the season you better have a lot more talent than the other team, especially if this is their game to play with emotion.
Last night, we saw an Oregon State team that no one thought had a chance ride a wave of emotion and a career performance from a pint-sized freshman running back while benefiting from in-game injuries to two of USC's best defensive players, and get a big victory.
Yeah, there it is right there.
After the blowout win over Ohio State, many members of the media and fans as well wrote USC's name in pencil in the BCS National Championship Game. A mere 12 days and 1 game later, their title hopes are in serious jeopardy. Not only that, but with their weak-ass schedule (no games remaining against currently ranked teams), they don't figure to get a lot of slack from pollsters (at least not the ones who are paying attention)).
I'm not going to sit here and say Oregon State is better than USC. They aren't. If these teams played 50 times, USC would likely win at least 45 of them. But last night they showed that the most talented team does not always win in college football. Sometimes the night goes to the team that got more emotionally invested.
Oregon State was playing their most important game of the season. USC was playing just another game, and they didn't get up for it. They found themselves thoroughly outplayed in the first half and behind 21-0 at halftime.
USC found its game in the second half, scoring 2 quick touchdowns in the third quarter but couldn't keep up the energy. They didn't score again until they had handed a touchdown to Oregon State on an interception.
When USC scored, they did so quickly and decisively. They scored touchdowns on drives of 2:50, 3:01, and 1:20. When they played quickly, they played well. When they played slowly, they couldn't maintain any advancement.
Turnovers also play a huge role, and they are almost random. USC committed 2 costly turnovers while Oregon State protected the ball. OSU scored 13 points off of USC turnovers, including both of their last two touchdowns.
It's a funny sport, college football. It seems as soon as a team starts believing it's unbeatable, it gets beaten. These lessons are re-taught every year, but it seems no one ever fully learns them.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
One more reason I like Miles
When was the last time some nonsense like this happened to LSU under Miles? Arguably never.
2005 Losses – Tennessee, Georgia
2006 Losses – @ Auburn, @ Florida
2007 Losses – @Kentucky, Arkansas
2008 Losses – None
The two that someone could really point to would be the loss at Kentucky. While that’s not a very understandable loss for the tigers, Kentucky was ranked 17th in the country at the time and it was at Kentucky.
The other being the Arkansas game last year, and that is arguably valid. I just have so much respect for McFadden and Jones (two first round draft picks), that even though it was a home game, it was a very losable game for any team. Especially one for a team that didnt have Dorsey, Alexander, and Beckwith. Every team has injuries, but when you are playing the most lethal running back combination in college football (that year), its pretty tough to not have your starting defensive tackles (one an all american) and middle linebacker.
These two loses were upsets, no doubt, but they were not a upset of the USC v Stanford, USC v Oregon St, Bama v ULL, WV v Pitt variety. I think that says a lot for Miles, that the guys are ready to play come game time. There are better and worse games, but we have been consistent and have made good adjustments during the games.
At the time...
The 2005 LSU-UT game was a matchup of top 25 teams, however UT went on to a 5-6 record that year. In hindsight that is a pretty ugly loss at home. Remember we got beat by freaking Rick Clauson in the second half. It was absolutely horrible the lack of adjustments in that game.
I really think that Les was not the coach then that he is now. He has really improved since the 2005 UT loss and 2006 AU loss. I wouldn’t trade Miles for any coach in the country at this point, however I wouldn’t have said that after 2006.
good memory
I forgot about that. VERY frustrating game. Casey Clausen’s little brother. Transferred from LSU I think.. and about 1/2 as talented as Casey. I remember LSU beating them up the first half and just being totally incompetent the second half. You’re right.
Man, has Tennessee fallen. Remember the year we beat Tenn in the SEC championship (2001) and kept them out of the title game. They had Casey Clausen, Kelly Washington, Jason Witten, Albert Haynesworth, John Henderson, Donte Stallworth… it was such a ridiculously talented team.
I thought Miles was a bit of a moron until last season. I think it was the interviews. He would always say things that made him seem just dumb… dumb as a fox it turns out. Now I love the guy.
The Tennessee Loss
That was not a bad loss under the circumstances. Remember, that this was the Hurricane Rita game. Our team was very much out of game shape because of the disruption caused by the two hurricanes. The team lost, on average, about 7 pounds per person. That’s astonishing. In the game, the team just ran out of gas there at the end. There’s nothing more to it. They were playing a talented team and didn’t have any energy left by the 4th quarter. The fact that the wheels came off of Tennessee later is almost irrelevant. The team was solid, and caught us at our most vulnerable time.
Richard Pittman
by Richard Pittman on Sep 26, 2008 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Meaning
The next mistake people will make is reading too much into this loss. Some writers will use this loss to club USC all season (how good can they be if they lost to OSU?) which is unfair. It’s not about your losses as much as your wins. Though USC will have no wins to counter this loss. But don’t say their title hopes are dead because, as this game demonstrates, anything can happen. Though their hopes are in serious jeopardy, as it is unlikley they will go the BCS title game over a one-loss team from the SEC, Big 12, or Big 10.
But now people will re-evaluate the Penn State win over OSU. Now, I already believe PSU has proven to be a top ten team, but if the Nitts win this weekend, get ready for some in the media to start talking up their win over OSU.
Nothing is more unreliable than the Team A beats Team B and Team B beats Team A and therefore Team A is better than Team C argument. It just doesn’t work that way. Which is to say, I agree. The problem with USC is that this isn’t a contest of who looks better on film. You have to have some accomplishments to really make an argument. Outside of the Ohio State win, which is admittedly very impressive, this team will have a record of beating up on patsies and losing to a team that is not nearly as talented as they are.
I agree that you need to “start with your wins” when talking about your resume for the national championship, and USC’s was supposed to be, “We won ’em all, and beat Ohio State.” Now it’s just going to be, at best, "We beat Ohio State and creamed all but one of the teams we were supposed to cream.
Richard Pittman
by Richard Pittman on Sep 26, 2008 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions
USC is definitely not out of the BCS hunt...
Unless two other BCS teams go undefeated…which i don’t think will happen, USC is still in the hunt. The media simply has too much love for them.
Hopefully they will have another loss, b/c that is about the only thing that will absolutely block them from a chance at the BCS title game.
Not this time
I think it will take USC being one of only two BCS teams with less than 2 losses, and that’s assuming they don’t lose another one. They just won’t have that great of a resume when the season’s over. There won’t be a long list of big wins, and one bad loss really hurts. Oregon State is a bad loss at this point. It may look better over time, but right now this looks like a bad loss.
Richard Pittman
by Richard Pittman on Sep 26, 2008 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions
Wow
Woo Hoo! OK, happy dance over.
I am also in the group that does not think that USC is out of it. The love for USC runs rampant across the nation. The only team in the country that would have better shot, is Notre Dame if they even had a football program right now.

by 



















