I Don't Like Asking For Change
Let me get some things out of the way here. I think Les Miles, who I thought was on the warm seat earlier this year, I think that barring an absolutely catastrophic collapse where we are not competitive against either Ole Miss or Arkansas, he has clearly earned next year.
However, given our performance in our win against Louisiana Tech, a catastrophic collapse is not exactly impossible. I'm not talking about merely losing. Losing happens. These teams are pretty good, and we are only pretty good ourselves. Losing both games is entirely possible, but merely losing would only crank up the heat a little bit and make 2010 do-or-die. It wouldn't get the water boiling. I'm talking about 35-10 losses where we don't play close to the level of competition and look flat and uninspired (like we did on Saturday). That would maybe, possibly lead to a change at the top, but even then I am not so sure.
I certainly don't want it, and I really don't expect it. I think we are going to be a much better team this Saturday than we were last Saturday.
I do, however, believe that it is time for a change of offensive philosophy. I watch college football games and I see other teams run a play where everyone is perfectly positioned to block someone and open a lane for someone with the ball. I see passing routes run with perfect timing and precision. I see elaborate plays (a couple of them) run beautifully. I hear announcers say, "That was a beautifully designed play, and well-executed by the [mascots]." I never hear that said about LSU.
The last time I remember a "beautifully designed play" that was well-executed was when Matt Flynn hit Richard Dickson on a "tackle-eligible" or unbalanced line pass play in the BCSNCG two years ago. That was a heck of a play, and Gary Crowton deserves not-a-little-bit of credit for our 2007 national championship, but it's clear that things have been regressing offensively since then.
In 2007, we never adjusted to Jarrett Lee's problems throwing the ball, and to make matters worse it seemed like whenever something bad would happen on the field, Lee would go sit on the bench by himself and get no instruction or no encouragement from any coach. He would just sit and wallow in misery.
And this year, the numbers tell the tale. We have future NFL players at WR#1, WR#2, WR#3, running back, tight end, and offensive tackle, and we have what I think is a reasonably solid college quarterback, yet we are 11th in the SEC in total offense. 9th in scoring offense. 10th in rushing offense. 9th in passing offense. We have one of the worst offenses in the conference despite having among the best skill-position talent and an offensive line that Miles says is his most talented ever.
I think the root cause of this is our desire to run anything and everything at any time. I feel like a broken record for saying this so much lately, but I think that we run so many different and disparate things that we can't possibly run all of it well. Not only can we not possibly run all of it well, we're not running any of it well.
I am tempted to say, "Well, let's let Miles just rein in Crowton," but that would be like buying a Miata and asking it to haul lumber for you. Gary Crowton cannot be Joe Paterno, because that's not Crowton's game. Crowton is wide open, throw everything at you all the time. If you want something different from that, you want someone besides Crowton. Personally, I think his type of game would play better in the NFL, where offenses have enough practice time to get good at everything. Meanwhile, his multi-set offense becomes a hindrance in college.
0 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
Agreed...
You did not say it, but you wanted to….. Gary Crowton must go… I dropped my drink on the rug when I saw him call Jarrett Lee to run the option… THE OPTION… JARRETT LEE!
PS firegarycrowton.com is already taken…
by FlaTiger on Nov 16, 2009 7:57 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
firegarycrowton.com
I heard a rumor that supposedly the athletic department owns that and other fire(insert coach name).(internet suffix) derivatives.
by amiznit on Nov 16, 2009 10:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gary Crowton hates me
and Les encourages it. Thank goodness we had some good recruiting years, because I can’t see why anyone would still want to go to LSU if Crowton is there making our talented offensive players look so much worse than they are.
by Street Diction on Nov 16, 2009 9:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Gary Crowton
is the least common denominator. Throughout the year so many have observed and commented on the poor play calling in virtually every game. It was disguised somewhat by Jefferson’s inexperience and we had to allow the season to mature so we could see if Crowton had some sort of method in bringing him along… and as you have noted, the same helter skelter play calling continues. I agree with Fla Tiger above that it was unbelievable that Jarret Lee would ever be considered to try the option; even comical. But then, Jefferson has been running the option all season and Crowton has not been able to establish in him the concept of the QB role in making the pitch work. We definitely need a change in offensive coordinator… so how about Dooley? He attacked us about as well as anyone this year with less to work with, and got outstanding production.
by NWTiger on Nov 16, 2009 10:00 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
My mom...
…called me up to say we should hire that Dooley guy. If my mother can recognize a better OC, you know its bad. As she said, you could tell he was trying to win.
Sometimes, the game ain’t complex.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
by Poseur on Nov 16, 2009 11:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Track record
When you look at the way this has happened with Crowton at other jobs, and the fact that things have gotten this bad this quickly, I just can’t see things ending well. It’s not like this is a totally green offense.
by Billy Gomila on Nov 16, 2009 11:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a good point...
….about Crowton’s track record. At BYU and Oregon, his offenses were off the charts in year one, decent in year two, then coming off the track after year three, and I think Richard hit the nail on the head with his comment “I think the root cause of this is our desire to run anything and everything at any time.” Crowton just seems to be the kind of guy that is only interested in adding to the playbook, not refining it and letting his offense go out and execute the kind of game plan that the personnel is comfortable with/capable of. I don’t doubt that he’s a great offensive mind, but I do think he has a problem with expecting everyone on the team to have the same football intelligence that he does and to be capable of whatever he asks, whether they are or not.
Roll Bama Roll - The Champagne of Bama Blogs.
by Todd on Nov 16, 2009 8:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So who do we want?
Dooley might be nice, but LA tech is #70 in total O. Which is still far better than our 107 ranking.
by Nearl on Nov 16, 2009 11:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Bryan Harsin
CHAD JONES! WOOOO!!!!
by The Bengal on Nov 16, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You don't go from La. Tech's head coach to LSU's Off. Coordinator
by Billy Gomila on Nov 16, 2009 11:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
And Dooley is Head Coach AND Athletic Director
His next step will be head coach of a school in a BCS conference.
CHAD JONES! WOOOO!!!!
by The Bengal on Nov 16, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Over what time frame?
Because ahhm, Mr Crowton did it!
by GeauxTigers on Nov 16, 2009 8:31 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Latter day Tepper?
Anybody see parallels between Crowton’s overly complex offense that tries to do everything and makes the players worry more about thinking than playing and Tepper’s complex defenses that had everyone playing tight from having to think too much? I say it’s better to just let them play.
by ATX Tiger on Nov 16, 2009 11:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
And who
do we have to kill to get a QB coach? Or is that an NCAA violation?
At the end of the day
by Mikeno on Nov 16, 2009 11:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Can't add another coach without getting rid of one
by Billy Gomila on Nov 16, 2009 12:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Richard had a post last year
About not having a dedicated Tight Ends coach and instead adding a QB coach. Let Studrawa coach TE blocking assignments and McCarthy coach TE receiving.
CHAD JONES! WOOOO!!!!
by The Bengal on Nov 16, 2009 1:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
I agreed with Richard’s comment then and I agree with it now. How many touches does a TE get compared to a QB?
I also think we should get back to a pro-style offense. Many college teams are going with spread or other gimmick offences that don’t correlate at the next level. If we stick to a pro-style set and bring in a reputable QB coach, we could have a huge recruiting advantage and become Quarter Back U of the next decade.
by Gman6809 on Nov 16, 2009 8:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Your recruiting angle is valid,
but referring to offenses as “gimmick” offenses is misguided imo. The job of an offense is to move the football. If it’s the spread, spread option, run and shoot, veer option, wing T, pro style, or whatever, I frankly don’t give a damn. If it works, that is what matters. If it helps with recruiting, even better.
Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.
St. Louis vegetarian blog
by Gregatron on Nov 16, 2009 8:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just to play Devil's Advocate here....
…let me point out a few things.
This was an offense without its starting quarterback, running back, tight end, and center.
For all of the complaints about how little we ran, we ran the ball 30 out of 53 plays, or 56.6%. That’s a strong lean to running plays.
We didn’t need to show much this game, and the defense did the offense no favors, in the first half especially, by not getting La-Tech’s offense off the field.
Now I’m sure that someone is thinking right now that we should run the ball 100% of the time if we average 6 yards a carry, like we did. However, you have to pass the ball at least a little bit to keep the defense honest. I don’t care who you are, or who you’re playing, if they have 8 or 9 in the box, running the ball is going to be quite difficult. Passing the ball, and especially throwing it deep, helps keep them honest, even if the passing plays are unsuccessful. Something related to this that I don’t quite get is why everyone’s getting mad at Crowton. You want him to literally call running plays every down? It’s not his fault Lee played an incredibly crappy game. Coaches coach, players play, and you can’t tell the defense that you’re done with one entire phase of your offense. Now this doesn’t take into account what may or may not have happened in other games, I’m talking about this one only.
Last point: we had to figure out what Lee can give us. Turns out, it’s next to nothing, at least right now. It’s better to figure that out now than to try and figure it out when Jefferson gets hurt, or if he’s not 100% and we can’t decide who to play. I would much rather figure that out against La-Tech than against Ole Miss. It’s one game. Last week we were incredibly happy at how well we played Alabama, feeling we should’ve won (and the hangover from last week could certainly have been a factor). Let’s get ready for Ole Miss, because we won’t have to see that offense again unless Jefferson gets hurt. And hopefully we’ll see Shepard or someone else if that ever happens.
by Ianoka on Nov 16, 2009 10:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thank You, well said!
GEAUX TIGERS!!!
by SouthernMan on Nov 17, 2009 7:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















