Alabama Preview
Is it my imagination, or has the look of ATVS changed?
Anyway, a preview of the Alabama Crimson Tide would look awfully funny if it didn't start with Mark Ingram. I was surprised to find out that he is only 2nd in the conference in total rushing yards, behind Ben Tate of Auburn, but Tate has carried the ball 40 more times and has had an extra game to accumulate those yards. Ingram is running hard, getting 6.6 yards per attempt. Only Michael Smith of Arkansas (6.4 yards per carry) is getting close that average per carry among backs with lots of carries. Not only does he run the ball, but he has also caught 19 passes for 186 yards. That puts him in a tie for 2nd on the team in receptions and 4th in yards.
Ingram is a legitimate Heisman contender right now. He has scored 11 of Alabama's 26 offensive touchdowns, with 8 rushing touchdowns and 3 receiving. He is also the "quarterback" of Alabama's Wildcat and Bobcat offenses (Wildcat means that Greg McElroy is lined up as a receiver; Bobcat means McElroy is not in the game). He may yet throw the ball, though they have not tried to sell that yet. He's Bama's most dangerous player.
After him, things get a little more dicey for the Crimson Tide.
Quarterback Greg McElroy started out the season strong, but he hasn't thrown a touchdown pass in 3 games, throwing 2 interceptions in that time. His ATVSQBPI in those three games has been 3.6, 1.5, and 4.4. That 4.4 sitting by itself is not awful, but when that's your best game in 3, there are problems. Despite this, Bama has won those three games, though they were somewhat fortunate to escape the Tennessee game with a win, as Ingram was contained. They hit a couple of long field goals and blocked a couple of long field goals to preserve a 12-10 win in that one, as we all remember.
McElroy is a typical college quarterback. He has decent arm strength and decent mobility, willing to take a few hits to help his team if need be, but more effective throwing the ball. He has struggled with accuracy and decision-making lately despite not being victimized by a lot of sacks.
If we want to discuss things like chickens and eggs and their relative temporal proximity, we can also talk about the struggles of Julio Jones, who through 8 games has only 20 receptions for only 229 yards and a touchdown. Julio Jones was supposed to be an All-American candidate, but you won't find him on any of the leaderboards in receptions or yardage in the conference. The leading receiver in the SEC is A.J. Green, who has over twice as many catches and over 3 times as many receiving yards. In Bama's last game against Tennessee, they made a conscious effort to get him more involved, giving him a lot of short and safe throws. He ended up with 7 catches for 54 yards.
In the Bama passing game, the receiver who scares me the most is Colin Peek, who has been deadly as a tight end over the middle of the field. He has been hurt though, or he would very likely be Bama's leading receiver both in catches and in yards. As it is, Julio Jones leads in catches, thanks to his 7 against Tennessee, and Marquis Maze, who is a deep ball specialist, leads in yards. Mark Ingram leads in touchdown receptions.
Other offensive weapons for Alabama include the true freshman Trent Richardson, who we really recruited hard and hoped to come to us. He has had a fine freshman campaign, with 377 yards on 74 carries. He has broken off a couple of very long runs, but he is not as consistently productive as Ingram.
Alabama's biggest advantage over us when they have the ball is the middle of their offensive line against the middle of our defense. They have been deadly running the ball between the tackles and Florida ran the ball up the middle on us constantly and we couldn't stop it. I would fully expect, given that LSU's secondary is more than a match for the Bama receivers, that Bama will run the ball and run the ball and run the ball until we show we can stop it. We may not be able to, and why should Bama get all fancy on us if they can run it effectively whenever they want? Our linebacker corps has been very good, but is not really built to take on a straight-ahead rushing attack, as our middle linebacker Kelvin Sheppard (who has been outstanding this year) is a little undersized to be taking on straight-ahead blockers and rushers. He's more of an angler.
On defense, it's the same story. LSU has an advantage when our receivers go against their secondary, but the middle of the defense has a big advantage over the middle of our offense. The combination of nose tackle Terrance Cody and linebacker Rolando McClain is outstanding, better than any we've faced this year. I truly do not expect us to get very far running Charles Scott up the middle. The middle of our offensive line just has not been that good this year and this is the biggest mismatch they will face.
If we're going to have success, it will be to the outside of the hashes, using Russell Shepard, or Keiland Williams, or Trindon Holliday. This is not to say that the outside of Bama's defense is weak. It's just not as strong as the inside of Bama's defense, which is extraordinary.
Our real advantage is with our receiver corps, where Terrance Toliver and Brandon Lafell make up the best 1-2 receiver combination in the conference. Toliver's 38 catches puts him tied for 2nd in the league with Shay Hodge of Ole Miss behind A.J. Green. Lafell's 37 puts him 4th. No combination of receivers in the conference has those kinds of numbers. Aaron Hernandez and Riley Cooper of Florida combine for 68 receptions, and they are the closest. Bama's secondary is beatable, and these are just the two receivers to beat it.
The problem is that our offensive line will have to give the receivers time to beat that secondary. Bama is tied for the conference lead in sacks with 23. They get a lot of pressure, and protecting against pressure has not been a strong suit of our offensive line, nor has handling pressure been a strength of Jordan Jefferson's game. This is probably the one area where LSU will have to overperform its history in order for us to have a fighting chance. We will have to protect Jefferson better than we have before, and Jefferson will have to work quicker than he has in the past.
And lastly, special teams are huge for Alabama. They've won their last two games on field goals, as they haven't scored a touchdown since the first half of the South Carolina game. Leigh Tiffin has been the best kicker in the conference. Then there is that Javier Arenas guy, who is arguably the most dangerous punt returner in the conference. He will have to be held in check if we are going to win.
It is a tall order beating this Bama team, but we're getting them at our peak and we're as ready as we're ever going to be. I think we'll give them a tough game.
0 recs |
20 comments
|
Comments
If McElroy lines up at WR,
I would really like to see a CB or S knock him into the backfield and pound him. Not sure why other teams do not do this when QBs get flanked out.
by NOPE on Nov 3, 2009 8:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not to nit-pick
But that TD against S. Carolina was in the 4th quarter.
GREAT read!
Fumbles. It was always Fumbles
by DocFumbles on Nov 3, 2009 8:47 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Does anyone else find the type harder to read
or am I just tired from staying up to watch the Saints game?
by shelby924 on Nov 3, 2009 8:59 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Alabama game
How wonderful to truly look to a game like this with the thought that if we play very well, we will win. For years when we played Bama or USC or Nebraska you could not say that. And now you can.
by bcooper on Nov 3, 2009 10:46 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I expect nothing less
than a stellar game between Bama and LSU. However, I don’t think LSU can muster enough offense to beat Bama. Had LSU played Bama this past weekend, LSU would’ve won b/c Bama’s defense was beat down after 8 straight weeks of ball. However, nobody outside the SEC would admit that. I willing to bet this defense is now well rested and ready to go.
I think Bama’s play calling in the red zone has been questionable. Against the Vols, they’re inside the 5 with 2nd and 2 and then 3rd and 2, yet both times they throw to the end zone instead of handing the ball to Ingram or Richardson. Same thing against Ole Miss and South Carolina too. I haven’t understood it at all. McElroy’s inaccuracy has been due to him trying to force the ball to Julio and getting aggravated when he can’t get it to him. Too many times over the last few games I’ve seen go to Julio with 2-3 defenders around him and there were other receivers wide open on the field.
LSU does have good receivers, but I don’t know if they can beat Bama’s secondary. They have very good DBs and Barron has great speed at safety to help them out if they do get beat. If LSU can get Scott going and Jefforson takes his time, then this will be a very close game. If not, then I don’t know. I expect LSUs defense to keep it close. I just don’t expect LSUs offense to help keep the defense off the field.
Good luck this weekend. Wish I could be there, but I’ll be watching the game from Iraq!
GO NOLES! ROLL TIDE!
He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!
by gonolesrolltide on Nov 3, 2009 10:49 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good point about the rest & bye
How bad does it suck that LSU got to play both Florida & Alabama as they come off of byes?
I think LSU’s defense can contain Bama’s offense; this game is going to be won or lost by LSU’s success in the air (unless Shepard gives us a running game we haven’t had all year). If LSU struggles, Bama will wear us down and eventually pile up points.
I'm proud of my damn strong football team. Have a great day!
by Mikethetiger on Nov 3, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That does bite/. Of course
we got the "benefit "of Va. Tech in a season opener, FIU off their bye, UT off their bye, Auburn off their bye, MSU off their bye. And everyone in between gunning for us. That’s a lot of fresh teams (and otherwise motivated ones) gunning for you, as you fully know from experience.
"Hollywood made a movie of my life. The film had me proposing to my wife on the football field. I would never misuse a football field that way." -Crazy Legs Hirsch
by Stuck in the Plains on Nov 3, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
FIU?!
Say it isn’t so! Hell, FIU could have a month off and add a random member of any NFL team, they still wouldn’t beat Bama. Everyone plays a season opener, so you’re not getting a lot of sympathy there, either.
Given the choice of UT, Auburn, and MSU off their bye or Florida and Bama off their bye… I think most people would take the former.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
by Poseur on Nov 3, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
They learned enough from the VT game to
flop n’ cut on every single play…
"Hollywood made a movie of my life. The film had me proposing to my wife on the football field. I would never misuse a football field that way." -Crazy Legs Hirsch
by Stuck in the Plains on Nov 4, 2009 9:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LSU will not fall to Alabama or Saban again this year.
We will not go down again to “turncoat Saban” and his crew. The Tide will keep rolling alright, right back into kickoff receiving position cause LSU gonna roll them over….LOL!
by dsrimages on Nov 3, 2009 12:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Saban's not a 'turncoat'
Other than that, I agree!!
GEAUX TIGERS!!!
by SouthernMan on Nov 3, 2009 1:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
With what offense?
He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!
by gonolesrolltide on Nov 3, 2009 4:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ironic that you would say that
when you compare the two offenses over the last 2 games.
by Ianoka on Nov 3, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
42 on Tulane??
So you scored 42 on a program that would lose get smoked by every team in the SEC. The teams LSU has scored a bunch on have not had good defenses. LSU’s offense struggled to score on a horrible UGA defense. Simple fact this year is that when LSU has played defensively sound teams, they have struggled to move the ball. I do not believe that is going to change against Bama’s defense.
This game will be a defensive struggle. Neither offense is great, but I believe Bama wins this game in the 4th quarter. Bama’s offense is a little bit better than LSU’s and will be able to get their defense more rest throughout the game. I don’t think LSU’s offense will give the defense enough rest for the end of the game. And if thats the case, you know Bama is going to keep running the ball with Ingram and Richardson and wear them down even further.
He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!
by gonolesrolltide on Nov 3, 2009 5:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Offense
You can read the post below this one for my thoughts on the offense. But the quick recap is that the passing game is definitely improving and the running game is still bad. We do not have a great offense this season, even with the improvement in the passing game. That said, Bama doesn’t have a fearsome offense right now either.
I think teams are not of static quality, and LSU’s offense is getting better while Bama’s is getting worse. Bama does have a better defense, but LSU’s defense is one of the stoutest in the country and continuing to improve as well. I think the key comes down to the red zone. Neither team has done a good job inside the 20 this season (though LSU’s defense has been stellar in the red zone). Whoever gets a red zone TD is probably going to win this game.
I am worried about the idea of wearing down. LSU’s advantages are at the speed positions, Bama’s advantages are on the lines. If Bama’s superior lines, on both sides of the football, wear down LSU’s line… well, your 4th quarter prediction could be spot on not ebcause of the defense being more rested but because of our lines breaking down late.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
by Poseur on Nov 3, 2009 5:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I realize it was against Tulane
And you make a good point that we’ve struggled against the good defenses we’ve played, but we improved quite a bit over the bye week offensively. This is not to say we are guaranteed to be improved against good defenses, only that we haven’t played one since we’ve improved. I would liken it a little to the beginning of the season when everyone puts up a ton of points on cupcakes, you don’t whose offense is legit and whose isn’t. We could be good, or we could be exposed.
That being said, both of the defenses are great, so I think it’s quite possible that this game will come down to turnovers, where LSU has one of the best margins in the country. Although on the other hand, if both defenses play great, and the offenses can’t turn turnovers into points, it won’t matter. I guess what I’m really trying to say is I have no idea haha
by Ianoka on Nov 3, 2009 7:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
wonderfully articulated argument
Terrence Cody eats your field goal!
by Wallacewade04 on Nov 3, 2009 5:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice article, but...
Forget the analysis. In most games, I would agree that analysis is relevant and important. However, this is a grudge match (at least on LSU’s side), and it’s for a trip to Atlanta. I’m not convinced the eight preceding games for both teams means all that much, except insofar as it speaks to the quality of the coaching and players. I have faith Alabama will win, but I have a pure and absolute knowledge this will be nothing short of a war.
Got banned by Rocky Top Talk in only one real day of posting. Damn, that was a good day!
by Anarchon on Nov 3, 2009 6:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Home field advantage?
Does this pertain at all? I know Bama used to win in Red Stick, but I feel better playing in Tuscaloosa.
by rolltidefromaz on Nov 3, 2009 10:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Can you guys please
wear black uniforms?
Lee Corso: How would you describe tailgating at Alabama?
Kirk Herbstreit: Barbecue and Ralph Lauren
by animalcracker on Nov 3, 2009 10:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















