Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Africa Cup Of Nations Semifinal: Black Stars Ripe For Upset?

Bama 24 - LSU 15: Snap Judgments

i had a good time at the game, and yes, my family is still intact.  We're pretty good at this "not aggravating each other after a sporting event" thing.  Anyway, here are my Snap Judgments, not at all influenced by television or camera angles or replays, because I have not seen any yet:

  • Patrick Peterson is an absolute stud.  He tied up Julio Jones the whole game, whenever they were matched up on each other.  If there's a better corner in the country, I'd like to see him, but not in a game in which we're playing against him.
  • His cramping problems could well have made the difference in the game.  The touchdown pass to Julio Jones came when Peterson was sitting out recovering from the cramps.  If he's in the game, that play is probably very different.  Heck, they may not have even called that play if Peterson was in the game.
  • Speaking of injuries, the injury to Jordan Jefferson (I do not know the nature of the injury or how serious it was) was another huge factor in this game.  I like Jarrett Lee, but he was not sharp in this game, and we had no passing game once Jefferson went out. 
  • In the stadium, people were saying the "interception" by Patrick Peterson really was an interception and that replay got it wrong.  Heading out of the stadium, we got an LSU feed and Jordy Hultberg was saying the same thing, suggesting the league office would probably deal with the replay official later.  I got home, and Mrs. ATVS told me there was no replay that showed it.  I don't know what to believe.  I know if we got that interception, we had the ball down by 6 with enough time on the clock to mix in runs and passes.  Again, maybe it's a different game.
  • How many people got hurt for us in that game?  Peterson 3 times, Al Woods, Ciron Black, Charles Scott, Jordan Jefferson.  Anyone else?  Richard Dickson did not even play a down.
  • We really played well for most of the game.  I cannot fault the effort our team put into that game.  I could tell before the opening kickoff that they were charged up and ready to play.  It showed throughout the game.
  • Who would have thought we'd score two touchdowns, and they would be scored by Deangelo Peterson and Stevan Ridley.
  • Bama really abandoned the run early in the game, and I have no idea why.  I thought Mark Ingram was hurt for a while, they were doing so little to get him involved in the game.  Then they came out running in the 2nd half and they were getting us on play after play.  I don't know why they didn't do that all game.
  • I really think our offensive line played its best game all season.  For the most part, except on the play where Jefferson took an intentional grounding penalty, our quarterbacks had time.  The running game was able to do a lot of positive things as well.
  • I have not even looked at a box score yet, but I figure they outgained us by quite a bit.  They had a few drives that got yards without getting points, whereas we did not have a lot of medium-length drives that did not produce points.
  • I did not like the decision to go for 2 at the time.  My rule of thumb is that you don't look at the chart until the 4th quarter, and there were still 3 minutes left in the 3rd when we got the touchdown.  It's hard to say the 1 point would have made a difference, but if we got for one then Bama probably goes for 1 on its touchdown to put them up by 4.  Then the final field goal would have kept it a 7 point game instead of a 9 point game.
  • I don't think Alabama was any more talented than we were, and I don't think we got outcoached.  I think we had some costly injuried during the course of the game that converted it from a game between two evenly matched teams to a mismatch.  When we needed to pass, we just couldn't.
  • There's still a lot to play for here.  The SEC Championship is out of reach, obviously, but we will be favored in every game we play, and if we win out we are a shoe-in for the Cap One Bowl with a shot at an 11-win season.  That's nothing to be ashamed of. 

Comment 47 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

3 points

1. We look confused on offense way to often for this late in the season. 6 men on the line cost us a big play early in game. In the second half it cost us at least timeouts.

2. Lack of talent and lack of depth on the D line. We get ripped by the running game, not just 4 or 5 yards per pop but 10+ yards. Play after play.

3, Seems like Alabama’s plan was to pass early to spread out the defense and tire the D line by making them chase, then turn to the running game. Don’t know if that was their plan, but sure how it played out.

by bcooper on Nov 7, 2009 8:46 PM CST reply actions  

Agree for the most part

I’m a Bammer, but I think you’re pretty much on target here. My interpretation of the lack of an overturn on the interception is that there wasn’t a good camera angle on his feet and it was impossible to tell whether his right foot hit in bounds (full disclosure: I thought it should’ve been overturned). I was screaming about the Alabama running game for the entire first half. I find our determination to pass 90% of the time in spite of the fact that we have the best running back in the country to be inexplicable. It nearly cost us in the Tennessee game and it didn’t do us any favors today.

That being said, my biggest question after the game was why the injuries seemed to be so one-sided tonight. Any thoughts on that?

by 12NationalChampionships on Nov 7, 2009 8:47 PM CST reply actions  

None of the injuries except Jefferson's ankle seemed to be from hard hits.

Peterson’s problem seemed to be cramps and Scott was protecting the ball with both hands and just managed to fall on his shoulder. Really sucks for him because he’s probably lost for the season just as the line seems to be able to start blocking well. Hopefully Jefferson’s ankle isn’t serious.

The linemen injuries just seemed to be people getting mixed up in the pile.

Richard, T-Bob went down as well at the end of the game. I know Lonergan took at least one snap.

CHAD JONES! WOOOO!!!!

by The Bengal on Nov 7, 2009 9:04 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree that Lee didn’t look sharp. He wasn’t bad, but he wasn’t good either. Maybe rusty is the best explanation. After we scored, I saw Jefferson jumping on the sideline. I wonder how severe his injury is, and if it’s not so severe that he can jump like a mad fool when we score, could he have played a bit? I don’t think Shepard played as QB once Jefferson left the game, either. Ordinarily, I really want continuity at QB, but this was a situation in which we should have mixed things up if only to keep BAMA off balance.

We got hosed on the Peterson “interception.” It was clear he had a foot down, and it was clear he caught the ball. When CBS was replaying it, there was a moment when the film went in reverse and it gave a great look at how he grabbed the ball and had control immediately. I can’t say we lost because of that bad call, but it was definitely bad, and definitely left us up the creek.

I agree with Pittman’s statement about the two teams—I don’t think they are more talented, and I don’t think they out-coached us. Bama won because their underproductive and overrated WR broke a big play after a bad attempt at a tackle, and because Ingram went wild in the 2nd half.

I liked the decision to go for two. Rules of thumb be damned, it was late in the third quarter. We had only found the end zone twice, but BAMA had been moving the ball all game and they were running very well in the second half. It looked very likely they’d score another TD, in which case a 7 point lead for us would have been huge to keep them from taking the lead with a TD. Moot point now.

by uberschuck on Nov 7, 2009 9:06 PM CST reply actions  

2 plays that changed things a lot

1. Running into the punter. I’m not blaming the effort — you have to be aggressive to actually block punts and if it had happened there, it would have been huge. As it was, Alabama were able to put the game away by going up 2 scores.

2. The replay. In my mind, there was no 1 angle that showed enough to reverse a call on the field. However, if you put 2 together it does show it. One of the first angles showed that the right foot was inbounds (CBS never went back to that angle). The other angles showed that PP possessed the ball and that the foot was down, but you couldn’t see if it was in bounds or not. If A=B and B=C then A=C. Rule 12-6, Sec7, Art 1 says that you can use “one or more video replays provided to the monitor.” Should have been reversed.

Neither of these things mean we would have won the game, but they certainly made it harder for us to do so.

by Army Tiger on Nov 7, 2009 9:10 PM CST reply actions  

The right..

foot is redundant. He clearly had possession when his left foot touched.

At the end of the day

by Mikeno on Nov 7, 2009 9:20 PM CST up reply actions  

my thought is this

Yes, i think it was in int but the play was ruled an incompletion on the field. That means you have to have indisputable evidence to overturn. IMO, i don’t think the replay showed that. IT sure has hell looked like his foot was in bounds but to say he “clearly” was in bounds might not be correct…

Plain and simple. Huge play that went to the home team…something that happens ALL the time.

Scoring against Alabama will be like birthing a child: rare, painful, and messy. - The Ghost of Jay Cutler

by bammer on Nov 8, 2009 8:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Agree about the replay

The first replay they showed (from a high angle behind the play) clearly showed he dragged his left foot in bounds and made a nice big divot, which they later focused on. But from that angle, you couldn’t tell if he had possession at that time. The last replay they showed, which was facing Peterson, you could tell he catches the ball with both hands, then his left foot drags to make the divot, then he tucks the ball and his right foot lands inbounds before he takes a step out of bounds.

Agree also this doesn’t mean we win, but it at least gives us a chance. The way Lee looked on the last drive, we didn’t have much of a chance anyway.

by Darko67 on Nov 7, 2009 9:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Agree with that

Just like in the Georgia game, the call didn’t lose us the game. It’s still a stretch to say Lee could have driven us 60 yards for a go-ahead touchdown, but it would have been nice to see the attempt.

The injuries to Jefferson and Peterson had a lot more impact on the game than the calls did.

CHAD JONES! WOOOO!!!!

by The Bengal on Nov 7, 2009 10:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Our D-line..

is a serious weak spot on this defense. Nevis is the only lineman that seems to bring it on every single play.

At the end of the day

by Mikeno on Nov 7, 2009 9:23 PM CST reply actions  

Holding calls...

…there were none called against Alabama. My blind grandmother counted three times when their offensive lineman gave mini-bearhugs to our defensive lineman opening up lanes for Ingram.

What about the non-call for the hands to the face of Hitt towards the end of the game? Just about ripped off his helmet. Tie this in with the bad spot on the third down play to start the game and you have a nice pair of bookends yet again showing the SEC is under developing their officials.

by TigerPaw on Nov 7, 2009 9:23 PM CST reply actions  

I seen several holds LSU got away with as well, not just Bama

He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!

by gonolesrolltide on Nov 8, 2009 4:21 AM CST up reply actions  

yea

Holds AAAALLLLWWAAAYYYYSSS go both ways. and if there are none called through the course of a game (for any team) Its hard to imagine.

by tidefanstuckatlsu on Nov 8, 2009 7:52 AM CST up reply actions  

For me ........

we should have went for it on forth and one. by not going for it cost us 8 points. But it was a good game and Lee was not even close on 99.9% of his passes he was throwing like he didn’t want to say he got pic’ed over throw after over throw, with him its time to move on.

10 win regular season is a huge step forward and 11 if we win our bowl I’ll take it.

I’m disappointed with the out come but someone had to lose. let hope they don’t let this get them down and we finish out strong.

"It is What It Is"

by GeauxDee on Nov 7, 2009 9:43 PM CST reply actions  

He was inbounds, that was def a pick.

its too bad, that could of played out much more interesting. Down to the wire it would have gone.

Seems like refs are more concearned with, does it have undisputable evidence then the actual call itself. This isnt court, you can change the play if you feel like you made the wrong call. They act like they have to go before a jury and provide the evidence to them. How many times is this going to happen this year?

by Hook85 on Nov 7, 2009 9:54 PM CST reply actions  

Poor officiating

The officiating was very poor throughout this game and very one-sided. I’m not saying it was intentional, but there were a ridiculous number of calls and no-calls that hindered LSU and benefited UA. Several should be forwarded to the front office for review, including the helmet-first contact on Jefferson, the “interception” that wasn’t, and the facemask penalty victimizing Lyle Hitt which led to T-Bob Hebert’s injury.

Even out the calling, and LSU keeps the upperhand, even with the injuries.

by corbettre on Nov 7, 2009 10:36 PM CST reply actions  

yea well a bad call set up your safety, so it wasn’t all that lopsided.

What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.

-Hank Hill

by Zoltar on Nov 7, 2009 11:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Which bad call are you referring to?

Seriously, I have no idea what you’re talking about.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Nov 8, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions  

I think a lot of Bama fans are saying

that we touched the ball at about the 3 yard line. Still though, I think McElroy was about 4-5 yards deep in the end zone, so it may not have mattered.

by Ianoka on Nov 8, 2009 10:20 PM CST up reply actions  

impartial opinion

as a gator who enjoys and respects both lsu and alabama, allow me to make the following neutral observations:
1-wow, patrick peterson was the best player on the field, enjoy him for the next couple of years.
2-i thought the officiating was actually excellent except for the obvious interception.
3-the reality of the game was that if patrick peterson was not hurt, jones wouldn’t have scored the go ahead td, it would have been an interesting last ten minutes. and two plays before that when lsu had 3rd and 2, charles scott would have made it but for his injury. so the reality is, alabama was very fortunate to have won this game.
4-at halftime, i started to dread the pounding the gators would have to suffer through if lsu won the game and the west. you guys got a respectable outfit.
5-alabama should stay quiet, and respect the sugar bowl this year. for that is where they will be. mcelroy is doomed against the gators. if you guys had your usual defensive line over the years, you woulda won this game.
this was one got the way. but at least you guys don’t have to have shame. it was two heavyweights in what i thought was a relatively clean game. and look on the bright side, we can all agree that georgia still sucks.

by quezzygreen on Nov 7, 2009 11:18 PM CST reply actions  

If you think you’re so superior, perhaps you should go back and watch the game where Arkansas dominated you. Arkansas…

What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.

-Hank Hill

by Zoltar on Nov 7, 2009 11:35 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

maybe you should go back and watch it, as I am sure you didnt

UF had 4 self inflicted turnovers and Arky still couldnt pull off the win, Mallet had several wide open recievers all game to put it away but he couldnt.
 

They dominated alright!

by Hook85 on Nov 8, 2009 11:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Bama out played LSU most of the game

This game shouldn’t have been close, but McElroy missed 3 easy TDs: 1st QTR to Maze, who had 6 yards of separation on the DB; 2nd QTR to Jones in the end zone; the 3rd QTR to Smelley (although I’m not sure if he would’ve scored, but he had a lot of separation, they should’ve ran that play with a WR running downfield). Those miscues by McElroy is what kept this game close.

As far as officiating: there were missed calls on both sides of the ball, it wasn’t lopsided. Both teams O-lines got away with multiple holds. With the pick, I don’t know. The ball wasn’t tucked when his left foot was down and the right foot was awfully close to the side line. Remember it was initially called an incomplete pass. Was it the right call, I don’t think it was, but it’s easy for us to sit here and criticize the refs. I even heard people complaining about the pass interference on Arenas that was waived off, even though the ball was 10 yards over the receiver’s head and 5 yards out of bounds.

Even if the pick would’ve went LSUs way, I don’t think they would’ve won this game. Lee, as you’ve stated, was throwing inaccurate. LSU’s D-line was wearing down as the 2nd half went on. The LSU defense narrowly stopped both Richardson and Ingram from breaking away for TDs on at least 3 separate plays. Had Peterson been in on the Jones TD, he may have stopped it, he may not have, who knows.
What Bama did do, successfully, was throw deep. Some of the throws were well over thrown, but it was enough to make LSUs secondary worry about the deep pass, which helped Bama’s run game and intermediate passing game.

Next year will be a great one.

He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!

by gonolesrolltide on Nov 8, 2009 4:53 AM CST reply actions  

if he was in

wouldnt have made alot of difference. The guy that was covering up julio was blocked perfectly. Whether that was peterson or whoever, they still would have been blocked. did he play an amazing game, heck yea. Can he walk thru a human being, well… no.

by tidefanstuckatlsu on Nov 8, 2009 7:55 AM CST up reply actions  

if Peterson was in

Mcinaccurate wouldn’t have thrown his way. Peterson would have jumped the route, instead of playing 20 yards off the ball, and we would likely have won the game.

Fantasy? Sure. But to say calls went both ways is homerism at its worst. They’re was a clear leaning of calls that went to the home team throughout.

Having played both Florida and Bama I can say the Gators are the better all-around team. Bama should you draw another mountainwest team (like UTAH) in the Sugar Bowl, please don’t embarrass the SEC again. Thanks.

by TigerPaw on Nov 8, 2009 10:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Brandon Taylor was covering Jones

and he missed a tackle. It was a very well executed play but the guy covering Jones had a 1 on 1 shot at making the tackle, and Peterson won that battle all day. Everyone else was blocked very well though, I don’t really get where the safety was at to allow a screen pass to go 80 yards for a touchdown, you’ve got to take good angles.

by Ianoka on Nov 8, 2009 10:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Competely Agree....

We really played well that night, but the injuries really did kill us. I hope that this game doesn’t end the season for us like it did last year. I really liked Shepard in at a ton of positions, and that we didn’t always (note: perhaps twice) give him the ball. JJ had a good game, the defense had a good game, especially in the first half (and discounting the big julio jones play in the 2nd half). Overall, I think we’re still a good team, and the backups (d peterson, s ridley) played pretty well. I don’t think d peterson had a meaningful catch before this game, but he looked pretty good (and JJ seems to have better chemistry with the younger receivers anyway).

by Andrew Tessier on Nov 8, 2009 9:29 AM CST reply actions  

It was an interception

Period. Not only did he have one foot down, the only debatable point is whether he got a second foot down at the end. That replay official looked at it and chose to call it wrong. If I were Les Miles some charity somewhere would be getting a whole hell of a lot more than just 30 grand this week.

And I’d dare Slive to suspend me. I’d dare him to enforce it.

by Billy Gomila on Nov 8, 2009 10:55 AM CST reply actions  

You have to have indisputable evidence that he had possession and a foot down in bounds. The first foot was down, but he was in the process of tucking the ball. It looked like he had a decent grip on it, but indisputable is a pretty high standard. It’s not totally unreasonable for the ref to come down on the side of upholding the call for that part of the play. The second foot was very close to the line, so I wouldn’t have ruled it an interception based on that. We never saw a replay from the sideline that could have shown inconclusively that he was in or out.

I probably would have given it to him if I was in the booth, but to say he chose to call it wrong is retarded. And wanting your coach to mouth off about it is just being a cry baby. The call on the punt where your players swat the ball at the 3 and it rolls down inches from the goal line was just as bad as the interception.

What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.

-Hank Hill

by Zoltar on Nov 8, 2009 11:35 AM CST up reply actions  

Disagree

It was pretty dang clear. I can’t find any national publications today defending the call, or saying it was borderline. I don’t blame the officials on the field, as it was a bang bang play with Peterson flying out of bounds, but if you’re in the booth you have got to make the right calls.

I disagree about Miles mouthing off too. If I were him I would absolutely rip the officials. It’s no disrespect to Alabama, who won the the game on their own merits, but the officiating this year has just been unconscionably bad. I would not give a crap about getting fined, or even suspended (especially for the La-Tech game). I would go on a 45 minute tirade ripping the officials.

Again, all that being said, it didn’t lose us the game, but we shouldn’t have to be talking about it. Alabama played a great game. I think Andy Staples said it best on SI.com

I wish I could have written Saturday about how Alabama receiver Julio Jones, who has struggled to break free all season, caught a 2-yard pass in the fourth quarter and turned it into a 73-yard touchdown. I wish I could have written about the grin on Alabama quarterback Greg McElroy’s face when he said “I’ve never seen anybody run that fast.”
I wish I could have written about how LSU cornerback Patrick Peterson fought off cramps for most of the game, or about how he just missed getting back on the field before that Jones touchdown play began. I should have written about how LSU soldiered on in spite of injuries to starting quarterback Jordan Jefferson (ankle) and tailback Charles Scott (broken collarbone).

by Ianoka on Nov 8, 2009 10:28 PM CST up reply actions  

So would you be crying about that call if LSU would've won??

He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!

by gonolesrolltide on Nov 8, 2009 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

A bad call is a bad call.

And when you fail to call it correctly on replay you turn one screwup into two.

It was an interception. Period. The only thing even remotely disputable was whether he got the SECOND foot down.

by Billy Gomila on Nov 8, 2009 1:24 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll take that as "no", you wouldn't be.

He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!

by gonolesrolltide on Nov 8, 2009 1:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll take it you lack readhing comprehension skills

A bad call is a bad call, win or lose.

The better question is, what would you be saying if the shoe was on the other foot.

by Billy Gomila on Nov 8, 2009 2:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe you should my earlier post and you wouldn't have even asked me that stupid question.

What most, not all, LSU fans aren’t saying is that they were simply out played come the 2nd half. They were also lucky McElroy over threw Smelley (3rd qtr) and Maze (1st qtr) and missed Jones (2nd qtr) wide.
Had the INT been awarded, would it have been a different out come? Probably not. However, that seems to be everybody’s focal point and ALMOST EVERYBODY thinks that LSU’s offense would’ve scored had they gotten the ball.

He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!

by gonolesrolltide on Nov 8, 2009 2:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Where did I say that was the game-decider?

I said it was a bad call. Period. This is not disputable.

Why don’t YOU learn to read before you call something stupid.

by Billy Gomila on Nov 8, 2009 3:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Saying that LSU is lucky

because McElroy is inaccurate is a really interesting way to prove that we were out played.

by shelby924 on Nov 8, 2009 7:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Haha yeah no kidding

What about the play where Scott was wide open and dropped the pass? I love how you are going back and assigning touchdowns to certain plays. If the center makes this block, he runs for a touchdown. If our quarterback was good, we have a touchdown here. If our running back was Gale Sayers, we would’ve scored right then.

It was a really well played game, marred by officiating. The officiating didn’t decide the game by any means, but it certainly had an impact. LSU still had chances to win though.

by Ianoka on Nov 8, 2009 10:23 PM CST up reply actions  

He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!

So how does that work, when one team sucks they root for the other. Might as well convert to a Tide fan altogher becuase FSU isnt going anywhere for awile. BTW FSU IS THE 4TH BEST TEAM IN FL. haha.

by Hook85 on Nov 8, 2009 11:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah

and unlike you, I support my team no matter what. It’s a shame you have absolutely no clue what FSU’s problems are.

He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!

by gonolesrolltide on Nov 9, 2009 10:10 AM CST up reply actions  

Gusty performance by the Tigers for the most part

We played Alabama straight up I felt. Who knows the difference of all the pre-snap penalties we inflicted upon ourselves in the 1st half. We got an uncanny number of injuries to crucial players, not the least was JJ – who I am very critical of. Our offense completely stalled with Jarrett Lee. Lee looked scared when he came in to the game – either the plays were designed for only one receiver – which I doubt – or he locked in on a guy at the snap and threw there.

The interception by Peterson showed a lack of guts on the referees. While people who claim that there was not “indisputable” evidence have a point, it’s weak. You know you’ve seen overturns on a lot less. Either way, that’s not the ball game there – I hardly think we’d move the ball there – we’d gone into the tank offensively and Lee wasn’t pulling us out.

Another beef – was it me or was there an awful lot of holding by the Tide O-line never called?

And I know this just perpetuates the Saban myth, but our lack of discipline with pre-snap penalties was a huge factor in the outcome of the game – it was that close. Also, Peterson cramping in the early 3rd quarter? Are we hydrating and stretching? These are things that are potentially resolved from the first day of spring ball with a discipline and dedication to conditioning. I wasn’t there, so it’s just speculation on my part – but it just adds to my less than firm belief in Les Miles.

by drbonne on Nov 8, 2009 12:12 PM CST reply actions  

Penalties cost us

but don’t forget, Alabama had a 12 man penalty that cost them a short chance at a touchdown, another one that would have been called if Lee had gotten the snap off that would have given us a first down on 3rd and two. So don’t forget that Saban’s team had some of their own organization issues.

CHAD JONES! WOOOO!!!!

by The Bengal on Nov 8, 2009 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

I disagree about the cramping issue

I’m sick of hearing people blame stuff like that on LSU’s conditioning. Peterson should be responsible for his own dang hydration. That one is on nobody but him.

Also, Brandon Taylor had a bad game yesterday, getting beat on 2 touchdowns. I don’t know why he was our next corner up instead of a Ron Brooks or a Drayton Calhoun or someone. Man it’s frustrating.

by Ianoka on Nov 8, 2009 10:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I honestly believe...

that the official on the sideline on the disputed incomplete pass had no idea what happened. Watching the game on TV I saw him run up after the play looking around for help. I think he didn’t see Julio with the ball and believed it was an incompletion. He did not look at the sideline when it was apparent that LSU had caught the ball.

All in all, after calming down and a few Crown and Diet Cokes later, I was very pleased with the effort. The entire game I was thinking of that cliche phrase “A battle of heavyweights.” I will say that it was a truly enjoyable game and I was excited about the effort the team displayed.

All I can say is that if LSU can play with the effort and desire they showed last night, I find it hard to believe that Ole Miss and Arkansas can beat us. I originally predicted a 9-3 season for LSU. I now think a 10-2 season is within reach.

Geaux Tigers!

by Purpletiger006 on Nov 8, 2009 7:42 PM CST reply actions  

That's the attitude

we should have today, and on thru the rest of the season.

by artiger on Nov 8, 2009 8:15 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree about the on field official

And I don’t play him. That was a long developing play, and McElroy was heading to the sideline, defenders closing in, and they had a lot of things to watch-holding, clipping, out of bounds, roughing the quarterback. And then McElroy throws the ball to 2 guys sprinting full speed back towards the sideline. Honestly I didn’t know what happened when I saw it live, if anything I thought it was incomplete. That being said, the replay official doesn’t get the same leeway, because there was plenty of evidence to overturn it.

by Ianoka on Nov 8, 2009 10:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about LSU Tigers. Best viewed in Wide mode

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

13 - 9

Conference

3 - 5

Won 1


Managing Editor / Chief Lackey

Pb140006_small PodKATT

Editors

Gse_multipart30441_small Richard Pittman

Me_and_beer_small Poseur

Tower_small Billy Gomila

Paulcrewe_small Paul Crewe

Authors

Mike_snow_small actioncuse