ESPN Is Not Helping the Dedicated SEC Fan
With all the furor over how the SEC (presumably at the behest of ESPN) has clamped down on all media feed that it does not control, one thing about the new deal between SEC and ESPN that was overlooked in preseason is probably the most important one. The quality of football the average SEC fan can watch on Saturday has declined. The new deal is to blame.
Allow me to demonstrate. Under the old television contracts, we would normally see the premier game in the conference (or OOC game in which an SEC team is the home game) on in the afternoon, with some rare exceptions that aren't important to the analysis. We would then see the #2 SEC game on ESPN or ESPN2 later in the evening. Perhaps the #3 SEC game would be on ESPN2 or ESPNU at nearly the same time (say with a 6:00pm kickoff for one a 7:00pm kickoff for the other). Failing that, the #3 game would be on the regional morning telecast, or that telecast would get the #4 game.
Now, with the SEC taking over ESPN and somehow Fox Sports Net getting involved, all of them showing games in the evening, and sometimes two games in the morning, here is what we have been getting:
Week 1 Morning: Kentucky vs. Miami (OH), Tennessee vs. W. Kentucky
Afternoon: Georgia vs. Oklahoma State (ABC), Jackson St. vs. Mississippi St.
Evening: La Tech vs. Auburn, Virginia Tech vs. Alabama.
Late Evening: LSU vs. Washington
Week 1 was kind of a special case because the games were so spread out and we got an overabundance of weak games due to it being week 1 (but kudos to those who did not schedule patsies), but you can see one thing here that I'm talking about. While we got a great game in the evening, there was a pretty decent game on directly opposite it, one that I suspect most of us would have preferred to see in the morning rather than two SEC teams facing overmatched patsies.
Week 2 Morning: Troy vs. Florida
Afternoon: UCLA vs. Tennessee
Evening: Mississippi State vs. Auburn (FSN), Vandy vs. LSU, Georgia vs. South Carolina
Here you can really see it. The SEC fan had to choose between 3 reasonably attractive in-conference games in the evening after being forced to endure a completely predictable non-conference blowout in the morning. I am sure that Florida fans liked being able to see their team on television without having to resort to pay-per-view, but the rest of us would have liked to have gotten to see more than 1 of the games played in the evening.
The curse continues:
Week 3 Morning: Louisville vs. Kentucky, North Texas vs. Alabama
Afternoon: Tennessee vs. Florida
Evening: ULL vs. LSU, Auburn vs. West Virginia, Georgia vs. Arkansas, Mississippi State vs. Vandy (not televised, unless on FSN which I haven't checked
Let's just skip over the argument that Tennessee vs. Florida is not the best game of the week, as that isn't the point here. Again, we're seeing an imbalance. Alright, Louisville vs. Kentucky is not a HORRIBLE looking game, but North Texas vs. Alabama? And for this we have to choose between three quality games in the evening (plus our own team's game). In years past, the ULL vs. LSU game would not have been televised, and Georgia vs. Arkansas probably would have been in the morning. On a week like this we'd see Georgia vs. Arkansas in the morning, Tennessee vs. Florida in the afternoon, and then have to choose between Auburn vs. W. Virginia (on ESPN) and MSU vs. Vandy (on ESPN2 or ESPNU, probably with some staggering of start times on those two games). Less overall on television, but more of an opportunity to watch the good games.
The good news is that everyone gets to see their own team more often, which is particularly good if you're a Vandy, Kentucky, or Mississippi State fan, as previously their games weren't televised all that often. It's also good news for those of us who don't like to see decent games not be moved to the morning. I am not one of those people, however. I liked that I got to see reasonably good football on Saturday starting at 11:30am local time and continuing until late in the evening.
This year, at least so far, the football watching day might as well start at 2:30pm. I have more choices of what to watch, but I can only choose to watch two decent games per day instead of getting three. I'll get to see LSU more, but overall I'll get to see less quality football.
The upshot is that if the only thing you care about is seeing Team X play, you will have more of an opportunity to do that. If you want to watch good football in the SEC, you have less of an opportunity, and that is a shame. All ESPN has to do is move the #3 or the #4 game of the game to the morning rather than keeping them all to the evening while moving the #6 and/or #7 game to the morning. I think everyone will be happier.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I see your point but....
I’ll take LSU on any time, day or night over the other games regardless of their importance to the conference. I don’t think anybody really wants to watch their team play at 11:00am on a Sat. morning. I usually have honey do’s any way that prevent me from watching any football until later in the day.
What I have noticed is the quality of the broadcast may have suffered somewhat. Anyone else seeing this? Missing a touchdown in the middle of a game? Come on!!!! I think I had to Youtube it later to actually see the whole play. That’s just one example. There are more. Not to mention the announcers or just off a bit? Can’t put my finger on this though.
DVR corrects this problem
I am lucky to catch an entire live LSU game. DVR helps. Guys that can still watch three or four games back to back on Saturday might want to peel their bloated carcasses off the couch and snatch a life.
really...?
Guys that can still watch three or four games back to back on Saturday might want to peel their bloated carcasses off the couch and snatch a life.
This is a football website you know.
Unnecessary Nope...
…I’m sure Richard’s life occurs all week providing for and being with his family. Also, his wife likes SEC football. And he probably plays with his daughter while watching football. He likes college football. You may like hunting and/or fishing. I don’t begrudge people their hunting/fishing time, which can take whole weekends sometimes.
by Gas_House_Gorillas on Sep 18, 2009 8:29 AM CDT up reply actions
But...
… I am bloated and have no life. I am going to watch A LOT of football. I am selfish and focus on no other people other than myself. And I do like to take up the whole couch.
So, NOPE was pretty much on the nose.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
No worries..
btw, I am 6’1" 180#. Hardly bloated. but all is forgiven.
Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.
by Richard Pittman on Sep 18, 2009 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions
I have been looking forward to being a couch potato all week...
I personally can’t wait to see every possible game on this weekend.
I totally envy you guys that will be able to log in 12 solid hours of TV viewing
I think you may have misunderstood me.
I mean going outside under the big yellow thing in the sky
its called the sun.
Also, too much info here Dick:
“btw, I am 6’1” 180#. Hardly bloated."
Any idea what your shuttle run number looks like?
Hahaha, exactly what I was thinking… please direct all future sunning vs. watching football to www.tigerdroppings.com
Be careful
You may lose brain cells on any given thread.
by Billy Gomila on Sep 18, 2009 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions
Count Your Blessings
The luxury of being able to see your team play 10 – 12 times a year without any extra expense over cable was unthinkable not that long ago. Being old, I remember the maximum 5 games over 2 years rule (thanks to Georgia and Oklahoma for getting rid of that) that guaranteed you couldn’t see your team play often unless you lived very close. I was talking to my Hulu generation kids about that last night in fact, and they find it almost as incomprehensible as “don’t touch that dial” meaning something.
We’re blessed with an incredible exposure to our teams on television, not to mention the amount of information the Internet makes available. Even if one had been willing and able to pay back in the 60s and 70s, the technology wasn’t there. It is true that more crappy games are being televised, but when it’s my team playing the cupcake of the week I don’t care—I still get to see them.
Radio
I still own the crappy radio we used to plug into a long extension cord and carry onto the roof so we could catch JBO’s clear signal all the way in Baltimore. But you had to sit on the roof to get the signal. And hope it didn’t rain.
I didn’t see what the Tigers looked like until the bowl game growing up.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
I think . . .
. . . some of these problems may be corrected when we get down to more conference play. The first few weekends, there are very few conference games, so almost every SEC team is playing a separate game. 8 – 9 games take place with an SEC team as opposed to a healthy average of 5 – 6 further on in the regular season. This should be easier in terms of scheduling, and I suspect that this is where the morning games will fit in better. Yes, Troy vs. Florida and Tennessee vs. W. Kentucky suck as morning games. Soon enough it will be the Arkansas vs. S. Carolinas and the Vandy vs. Kentuckys. A good enough upgrade to make it, I don’t know, watchable, but still not premier games in that spot. CBS will still have the afternoon game, LSU will play a bunch in the evenings, and ESPN will stick a couple of the other games on in various other timeslots.
Personally, I love it when two games I am interested in (outside of LSU games which get pretty much my undivided attention) are on at the same time. I like to watch a primary game, but flip to a few other games during the commericals and in case the primary game becomes uninteresting. That’s why I enjoy college football over the NFL (living in NY, I am forced to watch only the Jets and then only the Giants virtually every Sunday afternoon)
by TheBobLoblawBlog on Sep 18, 2009 4:29 PM CDT reply actions
Why I LOVE the new deal:
Like you said, LSU-ULL wouldn’t have been televised under the old deal. Nuff. Said.
Agreed!
ENOUGH said,., I live in Ocala, just south of Gainesville (poor me), and after I go to a friends house to watch the Gaytors pound Tennesee, wearing my LSU shirt and secretly cheering everytime the Tennessee slugs make it interesting, I cant wait to get back and watch MY team, the only team I care abot for FREE! Thank yu ESPN. And cant wait for Kentucky vs South Carolina in the early spot, instead of the Big Ten! Puke on a TV!
Rpb Cooksey
The thing is...
they could give us LSU in addition to giving us good morning games. This is not an either/or proposition.
Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.
by Richard Pittman on Sep 18, 2009 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Richard:
It certainly was an either/or propostion before. It may not be a perfect deal, but how many things these days are perfect? And before, LSU fans (who are scattered about the world) had no choice but to either be at the game or not see it at all. What’s worse?
I rest my case.
My greatest frustration with the new TV deal...
…is that it’s forcing a lot of games that would be night games into morning slots to be televised. Case in point. This morning’s Alabama vs. North Texas game has PPV night game written all over it. Now it’s on at 11:20am. It happens not to be ridiculously hot today (it’s raining instead), but if it were clear weather, it’d probably be pretty miserable to sit in today.

by 



















