LSU 31 - UL-Lafayette 3: Snap Judgments
Well, the game is over. Here are my subject-to-change, extremely early thoughts on the action:
- It was a pretty dull game. We didn't dominate every snap like we would have liked, but the game was never in doubt after we scored. ULL may be a cupcake, but they are a particularly hearty, rich cupcake. Remember, this team beat K-State last week.
- The defense again was outstanding. Yes, they gave up a couple of nice drives and needed a big goal line stand to keep ULL out of the end zone, but they got the big goal line stand. Don't overlook that.
- Chad Jones finally had the kind of game we've been looking for from him, and just in time for the heart of the SEC schedule, which is coming up.
- Patrick Peterson is such a stud, that he's getting bored during the games because they simply will not throw his way. With Peterson locked on the outside receiver, the game suddenly becomes 10-on-10. If opposing quarterbacks are going to continue refusing to throw at Peterson, we need to start moving him around to keep him on the opposing team's best receiver.
- Our offensive line is still not where it needs to be. The pass blocking was better this week, but we still aren't getting much of a push off the line on power running plays.
- I really like it when we line up with Scott at fullback and Keiland at tailback. That gives us a lot of options and makes both runners effective.
- We tried a lot of screens again, but this time we had a bit more success with them, including a couple nice screens to Lafell, including one for a touchdown.
- Jordan Jefferson continues to struggle with accuracy going down the field. I don't want to be too critical of a quarterback who is still young and improving, but his accuracy right now is not where it needs to be for us to be consistently competitive against the best teams in the conference. He's got a lot of talent, but he is not a finished product yet. I hope he gets there soon. I think he was better this week than last week.
- Terrance Toliver continues to be productive, but also continues to drop more than he should.
- We were good on special teams this week. Really nice kickoff coverage for the most part, good punting, a long field goal, and a nice kickoff return from Trindon Holliday.
- Jarrett Lee's ATVSQBPI tonight was 21.0. Nice night, but I still hope JJ isn't seriously hurt. It looked like a cramp.
- Keiland Williams and Charles Scott started out slow, but both ended up with good rate stats.
- We get Mississippi State next week, and they beat Vandy pretty good this week.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Love the fact that
Jarrett Lee stepped up and threw a touchdown for his only pass.
by Brandon Friedman on Sep 19, 2009 9:54 PM CDT reply actions
Saban vs Miles mentality
But we WON! Who cares if it was ULL? Who cares if they are the worst team we’ll face this year? Any win is now a GREAT win in Tiger Nation! Get with the program! sigh
Tulane will be worse..
Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.
by Richard Pittman on Sep 19, 2009 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions
And what did you expect?
beat them twice?
Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.
by Richard Pittman on Sep 19, 2009 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Look, I get it..
You don’t think very highly of this time right now. That’s fine. I see glaring weaknesses too. We’ve just gotten to the stage where you’ve made your point, and now you’re just repeating yourself.
I just get the feeling there’s nothing this team could have done to impress you. any misstep is telling, while any accomplishment is tainted by the level of competition. You have a right to your opinion, but other readers have the right to theirs, even if it disagrees with yours.
Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.
by Richard Pittman on Sep 19, 2009 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions
"homer BS?"
Where is this coming from? This is an LSU sports blog. What do you expect? Is 31-3 a poor display from your perspective? That’s a really bizarre statement. Can you elaborate please?
You would have to go through the game thread to understand.. this is a continuation of a conversation
Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.
by Richard Pittman on Sep 19, 2009 10:29 PM CDT up reply actions
just scanned the game thread...
I’d hate to watch a game with that guy. Far from perfect but what could anyone expect to see from LSU playing such an overmatched opponent? We’ll know a lot more after the Georgia game. The tight game at Washington doesn’t look so bad now either.
Dubois backs me on this
UGA, UF, UA, UM — 8-4 at this rate. If some miracle is worked before UGA, I’ll eat crow. Seriously. I’ll be the FIRST to call myself out. But at this rate, dear Homer, 8-4. At BEST. Watch.
"Honestly? What I see right now is an 8-4 team. LSU plays in the SEC, not the Sun Belt."
Carl Dubois
I rest my case.
well thank god you finally rested your case..
I don’t think anyone can read the above post and accuse me of being a homer. there are tons of criticisms in there.
Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.
by Richard Pittman on Sep 19, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed
The ‘homer’ thing is just a head-scratcher. Not even close. This was very balanced. You’ve been plenty critical of the team when it’s deserved, even though I disagreed with your take of the defense last week.
by GeauxTigers on Sep 19, 2009 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions
I love and appreciate the success we've had over the past 6 years
but I don’t like the fact that that it’s turning some of our fan base into imitations of the worst Alabama, Oklahoma, and Notre Dame fans. 14-0 and National Championships aren’t a birthright, they’re something to be savored and appreciated.
Am I concerned about this team? Absolutely. The O-Line, D-Line, and deep passing game are definite weaknesses right now. But most preseason projections for this team were 8-4 or 9-3. I don’t understand why people are melting down now over that prospect.
I agree w/ your overall sentiment but....
I think you are unders-selling our expectations. I haven’t seen anyone predict we would go 8-4. I think most people expect 9-3 at worst and 10-2 most likely. CFNews has us going 10-2.
Again, I agree w/ your overall sentiment, but don’t it is completely accurate to say most people expected 8-4. Further, assuming the preseason prediction was 8-4, that is well under performing for the talent level of this team.
You sir, are a tool...
There is an incredible difference between being optimistic and happy about the fact that our team just won by 28 points, and being a “homer”.
“Our offensive line is still not where it needs to be. The pass blocking was better this week, but we still aren’t getting much of a push off the line on power running plays.”
“Jordan Jefferson continues to struggle with accuracy going down the field. I don’t want to be too critical of a quarterback who is still young and improving, but his accuracy right now is not where it needs to be for us to be consistently competitive against the best teams in the conference.”
“Terrance Toliver continues to be productive, but also continues to drop more than he should.”
CFB, how can you possibly look at that writing and say it’s ‘homer’ talk? RP clearly concedes that we’re not at the stage yet to be competitive with the best teams in the conference. That’s not much different from saying that 8-4 or 9-3 would be the result if we have the status quo for the rest of the year. The very opposite of ‘homer.’
To borrow from Princess Bride – you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
by GeauxTigers on Sep 19, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions
just a troll
doing the whole “single issue poster” routine
People, please. We're all frightened and horny, but we can't let some killer dolphins keep us from living and scoring
by Man Mountain on Sep 19, 2009 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions
I didn't say we were going to dominate florida and bama..
All i said was I’m happy we beat ULL by 28. Dang man, look at the bright side.

by 






















