And The Valley Shook: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

LSU 30 - Mississippi State 26: Snap Judgments

You have to give a lot of credit to the defense in this game, and in particular to Chad Jones who made huge plays on 3rd and 4th down on our goal line stand.  Here are my snap judgments, subject to change upon further viewing:

  • Goal Line Stand!!  Holy Freakin' Feces!  How can you not love that?  Lots of players came up big.  None bigger than Chad Jones who knocked down what looked like a sure touchdown pass on 3rd down, and then joined Ryan Baker to make the big 4th down stop that essentially sealed the game.
  • Speaking of... Ryan Baker!  Backup linebacker coming up huge.  I can't figure out why he was in the game, unless we were in a 4-LB formation.
  • They really bailed out the offense, and in particular the offensive line, which had an awful game.  The running game went nowhere, and Jordan Jefferson was harassed all game.  This is quickly becoming THE problem area of this season.  It's been a problem in every game, and has not improved one lick from the Wshington game until now.
  • We outplayed MSU in the first half but couldn't get any distance from them because of the problems on special teams.  Our offensive unit outplayed their defensive unit, and our defensive unit outplayed their offensive unit.  We handed them a touchdown on special teams, and also missed an extra point.  If not for that, it could have been a 17-7 game at halftime and the whole spirit of the game would have been different.
  • I'm not going to name names, but I have a feeling we will not be seeing our previous starting long snapper again for a while.
  • MSU outplayed us in the second half, but couldn't make up any ground on us because we got a huge play on the touchdown to Lafell and a big punt return for a touchdown.  Other than that, our offense got very little going.
  • We had one nice drive in the second half, but it ended when Miles decided not to go for it on 4th and goal from the 2 and we had a bobbled snap on the field goal.  Again, special teams errors cost us points.
  • Speaking of that play, for the love of whatever deity or abstract concept you follow, please go for a touchdown on 4th and goal from the 2.  I know our offensive line got no push al game, but it's worth a shot.  Even if you miss it you leave the opposing offense in terrible field position.  A touchdown is worth more than twice what a field goal is worth and there's no down side unless disaster strikes, which can happen on any play from anywhere.  This is one of my biggest complaints about "conventional wisdom".  Unless it's the end of the half or the end of the game, or unless 3 points are particularly important under the circumstances, you should go for it when you're at the goal line.  Every time.  The mathematics are on your side, even if you AREN'T a good running team (which we aren't).
  • We clearly have problems on the offensive line, but I can't tell if that game was simply a matter of an inferior team playing its best game against us, or if we just aren't that good.  Thoughts?

0 recs  |  Comment 78 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Haha I was looking through the first half game thread...

and I couldn’t but help noticing Billy saying something like the following “I’m still not sure whether or not Chad Jones would be better of playing baseball”. Haha what do you think now?

As for going for the field goal on 4th and 2, that is absolutely the right call. Our defense had been dominating them, and we had a 2 point lead. Our running game was awful. If we went for it and didn’t get it, then MSU has a chance to win with a field goal.

And looking at the stats: holy crap did our offense struggle. I didn’t notice it too much during the game because of all the big plays, but we were 2-13 on 3rd down. We ran 31 times for 30 yards. Our passing game was as good as it’s been, but then we had all of the penalties that killed a lot of our promising drives.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 3:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I still think

He’s a remarkable athlete without great football instincts — and a much more natural baseball player. He had a couple bad plays in this game as well. But he did make a great play on the goal line and on that punt return.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 26, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i don't know

his pitching mechanics are cringe-inducing

People, please. We're all frightened and horny, but we can't let some killer dolphins keep us from living and scoring

by Man Mountain on Sep 27, 2009 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

4th and 2 at the goal line...

…I agree with you Richard. At this point in the game, you force your offense to make a statement. You are able to tell the offense for that one play that it is time to mark your territory. You get it and you demoralize a team that is beginning to believe that they can win the game. If you do not get it, the other team starts on the 2 instead of the 20. I know that a field goal from that point of the field should be a gimme, but in this game, nothing should have been taken for granted.

I truly believe that Les was outcoached in that game. He coached like he was scared.

I don’t know what Miss State was thinking by calling a pass on third and inches. WTF? They were running all over us that entire drive. I understand that hindsight is 20/20 but that decision left me baffled.

by Purpletiger006 on Sep 26, 2009 3:42 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

This really pissed me off, too

That may have been the worst call Les has ever made.

Is it just me, or has there been an ever-so-sutble shift in the attitude of this program towards complacency?

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's just stupid

How is that the worst call that Les has ever made? It is a freaking no brainer. Screw demoralizing statements, you give your team the best chance to win. Had we made that field goal, we wouldn’t have needed a goal line stand. Also, if it was 4th and 1, 4th and inches, then maybe I agree with you, but it’s 4th and 2, too long for a gimme dive/sneak. YOU GIVE YOUR TEAM THE BEST CHANCE TO WIN. PERIOD.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only because we missed the field goal.

How much more demoralizing would it have been had we gone for it, and failed? Which to be quite honest, we probably would have if we had tried running it.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, BEFORE the FG try

I was shocked, frankly, when the FG unit came out. If we failed, we have them pinned near the goal line and they have to go 98 yards for a TD. Such a no-brainer. How many points did we get out of that possession, btw?

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"How many points did we get?"

There is my point exactly. It should have been a gimme, and it was only demoralizing because we didn’t get points out of that possession.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wholeheartedly agree with everything

But on the last point, I have to say, sadly, that LSU just does NOT have a good OL. Despite what Les sings. They’ve shown nothing in pass protection, nor run blocking. NOTHING. And this is against the easiest part of our schedule. I mean, show us SOMETHING, ya know?

Jefferson — as usual — had to run for his life all day today, and if MSU can outrush LSU 5-1 in yardage, we’re gonna get seriously tagged (a la UGA and UF last year) sooner or later.

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 3:43 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh I have no doubt that our OL is pllaying poorly..

the question is whether or not MSU is roughly as good as we are overall, considering our problems on OL, or if they played their best game.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Sep 26, 2009 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

MSU was jacked, no doubt

Half of that, I feel, was due to our constantly keeping them in the game with our mistakes.

But if you look at talent disparity, when we match up with the likes of UF and Bama, oh man, are we gonna be in for it if things don’t change drastically. But how much can they change at this point? We’re 4 games into the season and have yet to show ANY growth on the OL.

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

There has to be someone that has some heart on that line. As a team you aren’t losing anything by putting someone who has less experience in the game. If you aren’t doing well, then the person you do put in can’t possibly be any worse.

by Purpletiger006 on Sep 26, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is PAST time to shake things up

Don’t know if the UGA game is the time to do that, but better late than never, I guess. I’ve harped on the OL after every game and people thought I was being negative, which irks me, but anyway…

Les has always displayed a bad habit of being the last person to realize something isn’t working on his football team. He’s a thick-headed, stubborn SOB. He could start by retracting his statement that this is the best OL he’s ever had. Either that, or yeah, bring in some hungrier players in practice this week. If there are any.

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Auburn rolled close to 400 yards on the ground against State....

We may just have to abandon a traditional running game completely to have a chance from here on out.

Meaning…no more Scott…only option plays and gimmick runs.

by TigerPaw on Sep 26, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

400-31

Nuff. Said.

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The way

Things are going in college football right now, everybody seems to be playing up and down week to week. At least LSU won on a down week. Now we see what happens next.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 26, 2009 3:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Amen

I’ll take the win, and the big plays, any day of the week.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

But it’s okay to demand more from your team. Les doesn’t seem to be doing that.

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't like to Sunday Morning Quarterback (Coach)...

But since it’s still Saturday, why do we run the ball off tackle on EVERY SINGLE COTTON PICKIN’ FIRST DOWN?

I MEAN EVERY SINGLE COTTON PICKIN’ FIRST DOWN we ran off tackle for anywhere from a two yard loss to a two yard game. Then bubble screen for nothing and it’s third and eight.

We have a LOT of GREAT players and a lot of heart, if we can get it to click we will be unstoppable.

I don’t know how we won that game but we did and gosh darn it a W is a W!!!

GEAUX TIGERS!!!

by SouthernMan on Sep 26, 2009 3:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Also, where was Shepard in the second half

he was our leading rusher even though he only played 4 snaps.

by 4.0 Point Stance on Sep 26, 2009 4:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

he looked great in the first half, I don’t know what happened.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Things look downright apocalyptic on other boards..

It think it’s important not to lose sight of the fact that we won the game. and aspects of our team played well, including the entire defense. We have problems, but you can’t turn your nose up completely at a conference road win.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Sep 26, 2009 4:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think you can point out how poorly the O line has been on rushes

and then criticize Les for not going for it on a 4th and 2. You have to trust a field goal kicker to make it two scores.

That said, I did think we did better protecting JJ this game then in the pass. He had some time. Not as much as he should, but it didn’t seem as bad. The stats might disagree with me, but I didn’t feel as bad about our past protection as in past weeks.

I'm proud of my damn strong football team. Have a great day!

by Mikethetiger on Sep 26, 2009 4:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

On that I disagree.

My whole point is that EVEN IF YOU FAIL, you have put the opposing team in a very bad position. Even if your chances of success are low, it is better to take the chance and leave the opponent on their own goalline if it doesn’t work.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Sep 26, 2009 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is the key point

Here is the downside of failure of not converting 4th and 2: MSU has the ball deep in their territory. The downside of missing the kick was putting the ball on the 20.

Here is the reward: Just by going for it, you show faith in your team. You’re telling the offense you believe in them. Also, for a team that has been lacking a killer instinct, this is a call that goes for the jugular. You score, the game is essentially over. and you’ve told the team that we are going for the kill (hell, even if you miss, you might get a confidence lift)

If you hit the kick, you have a five point lead. Whatever.

It was a gutless call. Completely horrible. LSU had so much to gain by going for it with very little cost if it didn’t work out.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Sep 26, 2009 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You make the freaking smart call

You could go for it on every 4th down, and that would be showing faith in your team, it would show the offense you believe in them, and it would go for the jugular. YOU MAKE IT A 2 POSSESSION GAME! If we had made it, then we wouldn’t have even needed the goal line stand.

Let’s say we went for it, didn’t get it, and then let’s just say that MSU scored from the 1 inch line. Two if’s, but neither of them require stretching the imagination hardly at all. We probably end up losing the game by 1 point. Is that worth “showing faith in the offense”? I see where you are coming from, because from a fan’s perspective you never want to see field goals, but it IS THE SMART CALL.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

2 Possession Game

But a FG only makes a 5-point game which is NOT a two possession game. The score was 23-21 at the time. Now, if you posess psychic power and know that LSU will score a TD and MSU will kick a FG, then by all meand, take the three to make it a two possession game at that future time.

But you have no idea what will happen. So you can’t coach to a future score, you have to think it will make it a 5-point lead, which is better than 2-point lead, but it is not the two possession game you’re looking for.

Let’s also take your first “if”. If LSU went for it and failed, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A BETTER RESULT THAN WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED.

Kicking was not the “smart call”, it was the call that made it less likely to receive criticism. Which is gutless. BTW – MSU bailed us out with a similarly gutless call to punt on 4th and 1.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Sep 26, 2009 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're right

What I meant was MSU would no longer be able to win with a field goal, which is a HUGE deal. The smart play at the time is to kick it, and the smart play in hindsight is to kick it.

As far as my first “if”, that is 100% hindsight. Knowing that the kick failed, you can say that easily, but 99% of the time we make that kick.

I would not be calling for Miles’ head or anything had he gone for it, even if we failed, and I might have even liked it, but he did the smart thing, and I find it hard to criticize him for that.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Richard, Poseur:

THANK. YOU.

Couldn’t agree more on every point, esp the having faith in your team. That kinda shit lingers in young players minds; it’s so telling.

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, it really doesn't

Any player with half a brain realizes what the smart call is, so they don’t get demoralized. And whenever that would happen to me, we would realize that is was our fault we didn’t get the first down on the first 3 tries.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's not to say it wouldn't give them a boost

if you go for it and you DO get it, but if you don’t, it’s extremely demoralizing, and not going for it does not demoralize you at all.

by Ianoka on Sep 26, 2009 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have to agree with Lanoka on this

I like the field goal in this situation. The final goal line stand is irrelevant if we’re up 9. And I have no faith in the OL at this point. I can’t blame Les for going for the field goal in that situation. If the team wants Les to go for it on 4th and 2 they need to show they can get two yards when they have to. I haven’t seen it yet.

by The Bengal on Sep 26, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again:

How did that turn out, fellas? lol

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"How did it turn out?"

as an argument, is almost irrelevant in the given discussion. Both Richard/Poseur and Lanoka are making legitimate cases without arguing from results.

Arguing from results in a situation in which a coach must consider both personnel and odds doesn’t help us think through the pros and cons of Miles’ decision making.

If LSU had made the FG there, Richard/Poseur would still have good reason to think it was a “gutless call.” If LSU had gone for it on 4th and 2 and scored the TD, Lanoka would still have good reason to think it wasn’t the “smart call.”

I say “almost irrelevant” above because the results of this decision will be helpful in discussing future coaching calls this season.

People, please. We're all frightened and horny, but we can't let some killer dolphins keep us from living and scoring

by Man Mountain on Sep 27, 2009 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

For the record..

I don’t think it was a “gutless call”. That’s Poseur. I just think it was a poor read of the percentages. I think there’s something to the “show your team you believe in them” call, but I tend to put more weight in the risk vs. reward analysis. I think that analysis, when you’re sitting on the 2-yard-line, tells you to go for it unless a) 3 points is especially important in that situation, or b) there is very little time on the clock.

If there’s very little time on the clock, there’s little benefit in pinning the other team down at their goal line, because the other team is unlikely to score even if they have decent field position, and because you are unlikely to get the ball back in time to do anything with it. This is why it wasn’t a bad idea to kick the field goal against ULL last week. It was at the end of the half.

Yesterday, we were ahead by 2 points and it was the 3rd quarter. It was too early to play the “make them get a touchdown instead of a field goal” game, so I would argue that we were not in a position where the 3 points would have been especially important, and there was plenty of time for the field position to matter.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Sep 27, 2009 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm with Richard.

I was thinking exactly the same things. GO. FOR. IT. The way the defense was stymying them with picks and pressure, even if we didn’t get the TD, they would likely have three and punted.

BTW, Rich, it should be Husband first, and then Father. Marriages that put the kids before the marriage always wind up with resentment and regret. Not telling you how to run your life, just giving the statistics to make an informed decision.

If we could just sythesize life in a laboratory, we could prove that the creation of life requires no intelligence.

by Tigernut on Sep 27, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I look at risk v. reward

That was my actual analysis if you go up a few responses. The risk was low and the reward was much higher for going for it. Then he decided to kick, which had low risk, but also low reward. It’s the kind of call made to avoid criticism.

That’s when I added gutless. To be fair, I think Mullen’s decsion to punt on 4th and 1 at the 50 was also pretty bad, though it had a much higher risk than Miles’ decision.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Sep 27, 2009 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think my next post is going to put out there that...

we should get Shepard more involved in the offense, and we need to make personnel changes on the OL.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Sep 26, 2009 4:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Shep seems confident enough at this point

To have his reigns taken off. Be it at QB, slot, whatever. I think Les doesn’t want to disrupt JJ’s confidence, though. I think that’s an issue. There’s a rivalry developing, there, I think.

Shep just needs to be on the field more, period. If you only bring him in in certain situations, the other team knows there’s a good chance he’s gonna get the ball. If he’s in the game more — preferably much more — the other team won’t be able to key on him so much.

And yeah, shake up the OL, threaten their playing time, and see what happens. I’m willing to give up a UGA loss before this happens, just to be sure before making such a drastic move — which can be so dangerous to team chemistry — with UF, AUB, BAMA and OM still to come. We can salvage a season out of a UGA loss, and we should probably see how our OL does against them before drastic measures. Should we see more of what we’ve seen against UGA, I say we’ve got nothing to lose that point with UF coming in. Might as well, at that point.

by CFB on Sep 26, 2009 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Les . . .

. . . is waiting until the Florida game to let Shepard have his first throw. In the red zone. On a jump pass.

I think Urban knows this as well. And I think it won’t work.

by Monkey Poop Battle on Sep 26, 2009 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree with both

Hopefully this will put an end to some of the JJ bashers as well. QB is not the primary weakness of this team. It’s a minor miracle JJ hasn’t thrown more interceptions than TDs with no run game and very shaky pass protection.

by The Bengal on Sep 26, 2009 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would like to see Shepard returning kickoffs

beside Holliday. That would be truly scary for return teams.

Also use Shepard role like Ole Miss uses Dexter McCluster. Jet sweeps, quick screens, halfback option.

by The Bengal on Sep 26, 2009 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I support Miles on all of the 4th down calls...

This one included.

I’d have kicked the field goal. Miles plays the percentages to PERFECTION. He knows our offense is not dominant and took the points. That’s what I’d have done too. It’s up for debate, surely, but I’d have gone for the points in that case.

Other than that, boy is this team bad. We have excellent skill (or speed?) position players but man we blow in the trenches. My thought is, the outcome of this game is meaningless. Last year when we beat State by 10 I knew exactly what kind of team we had. We can sugar coat this all we want guys, but when you beat State by 6 and need a goal line stand to do it you have a horrible team. Well average by NCAA standards but below average by SEC standards. It’s not just the O-line guys. It’s the scheme, it’s the O-line, and it’s the D-line.

by LSU Jonno on Sep 26, 2009 4:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I didn't see the entire game,

but I saw us missing a lot of tackles, especially watching Bama’s defense this afternoon. This is as big a problem as our O-line.

by artiger on Sep 26, 2009 5:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Belief in the o-line

If Les Miles doesn’t have faith and confidence in the offensive line—and it’s obvious by now that he doesn’t, in spite of his preseason comments—then why should he send the team a message that he does have such faith and confidence by going for it on 4th down?

I love going for it on fourth down, and think teams should try it more. I also understand the idea of “sending a message.” In this case, however, the message would have been a lie. LSU had done absolutely nothing in short-yardage situations to make anyone—be it Miles, the players, the fans, the other team—believe that a 4th and 2 attempt would be successful.

I understand the case for kicking and the case for going for it. I just don’t think it’s as “gutless” a call as others do.

by dan iqua on Sep 26, 2009 5:47 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nah.

I think he’ll keep saying he believes in them, and Crowton will keep calling short yardage plays like he doesn’t.

by dan iqua on Sep 26, 2009 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

This is the most insightful comment I’ve read so far on the going for it on 4th down question. Personally, I think it was the right call but I sympathize with the idea of being more aggressive. Overall, though, I think way too much is being made of that decision in this thread. There was no absolute right call to make there.

The offensive line is horrible and, besides the goal line stand, the D line is merely average. I was sick to my stomach watching this game. We haven’t shown anything that suggests we’ll give Georgia a competitive game next week. I’ll hope for the best but I’m expecting the worst. I’m feeling better and better about JJ but the O line won’t allow him to run a balanced offense.

by no brainer on Sep 26, 2009 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

UGA

not to pick on you specifically, but i am tired of hearing about georgia as the benchmark for this LSU team or how UGA will beat the crap out of LSU. UGA struggled at home to ASU. the sun devils are not a good team. and UGA struggled to beat them at home. joe cox is not a good qb, and he gets by on passing it to aj green. their defense is marginal. lsu will be fine between the hedges next weekend, and maybe we can finally see the tigers play in some decent weather for a change.

by in the 9th on Sep 26, 2009 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

comment on the punt return for TD

Every time I watch it I think about what a heady player Peterson is. Over about 80 yards he was directing traffic. He paced himself so that he would not be out of place for Jones, and then threw 2 blocks. Poseur likes to say that terms like “football IQ” and “heady player” are just code for unathletic white guys, but that’s not true in the case of Peterson for two obvious reasons.

Great vision…it was like he could see the way the play would unfold all along.

by uberschuck on Sep 26, 2009 6:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Mister Peterson

He is a player. He is a heady player and I like how the #18 jersey sort of goes to the grittiest player on the team. I want Peterson to take over the 18 jersey next season to keep the tradition alive. He is such a smart, hard nosed football player.

He’s a “blue collar” guy.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Sep 26, 2009 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

RIght now, he's the undergrad I can think of that would deserve it

If Jones continues to play like today he would be another candidate, but PP came out of the gates at the start of the season. It’ll be interesting him take on AC Green next week.

by The Bengal on Sep 26, 2009 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Possession

I do need someone to tell me my obsession with possession is OK and not unhealthy. I just scanned the box scores for our 4 games.

  1. of drives that went 10+ plays: 6
  2. of drives that lasted 5+ minutes: 4 (3 against ULaLa)
    longest drive of season (both plays & time): 13 plays for 6:18 (vs. ULaLa).

Ironically, not one of those drives went for a TD—4 FG and 2 punts.

Still, it’s driving me nuts that we can’t take a team by the throat with a methodical offense. Keep possession…run more plays…gain more yards…score more points…leave the opponent less chance to do the same. And, fewer ulcers for the fans.

by uberschuck on Sep 26, 2009 6:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

uh….

that’s not supposed to be a numbered list. I actually typed the pound sign, but this crazy blog contraption translated it into a numbered list. Whatever…where you see the 1. and 2. think “number.”

by uberschuck on Sep 26, 2009 6:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And another thing or two....

With Ole Miss choking at USC and Cal getting blown out by Oregon (whose uniforms are still ugly, just in a different way), we could find ourselves #5 in the nation tomorrow. Yikes! Anyone think we’re a top 5 team?

In the next 2 weeks we’ll find out how good we are.

Other losers: Miami and FSU.
I told you FSU did not deserve to be ranked higher, and they proved me right.
As for Miami, two things…one of ESPN’s talking heads made the point that they are the only undefeated ACC team…well, not any more. But that’s really laughable. After 3 weeks of football, the whole conference only had one undefeated team, and that was a team that had only played 2 games.

by uberschuck on Sep 26, 2009 6:47 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Offensive Identity

I think the problem with the offensive line is that we seem to still be trying to find our real groove. I mean, does it seem that we’re still trying to figure out what we’re really good at instead of just doing what’s working?

For goodness sakes, every time Shepard touches the ball it’s 5 yards! Are we going to see more of him in the upcoming crucial games? Play the kid more!!!! And I think it’s time to embrace the fact that we need Scott at FB and Williams at TB.

And another thing—let Jordan Jefferson roll out and run and pass like we did against GT last year! When he runs, it adds a totally new dimension, rattles the defense, and keeps the chains moving!

All that being said, how can we not be VERY nervous about our upcoming games?

by TigerTex on Sep 26, 2009 8:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No..

He did it in the off-season. That’s why there are so many formations with Williams AND Scott in the backfield. Scott sucking it up is not the problem.

by Mikeno on Sep 26, 2009 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Personally, I miss Murphy.

If we could just sythesize life in a laboratory, we could prove that the creation of life requires no intelligence.

by Tigernut on Sep 27, 2009 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am usually an optimist to a fault, but i’m surprised no one has gone here yet: crowton…. that was the most painfully miserable play calling I have seen in years. looks ike the game has passed him by. consistent calling of plays that had very little chance of success. we need to give our guys a chance to make plays.

by bjd006 on Sep 26, 2009 8:21 PM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

How can you call plays when they'll all fail?

O-line blows dude. Not much you can do. Blame goes to the entire Offensive staff.

by LSU Jonno on Sep 26, 2009 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quick.. Think fast..

Heads up. Gary Crowton or Willie Martinez?

Oct. 3, 2 go in 1 comes out.

by Mikeno on Sep 26, 2009 8:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Watching Georgia right now

And they’re not impressing. Every team in the SEC seems to have a weakness right now except for Bama.

by The Bengal on Sep 26, 2009 9:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really, when you look at the season...

UF and Bama look like sure fire losses.

Auburn, Ole Miss, UGA, and Arky all look like toss ups. If we split those we are looking at 4-4 in the conference, which would be an improvement over last year. Is that satisfying?

by LSU Jonno on Sep 26, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Team Speed Kills is reporting Tebow taken to the hospital with a head injury

If he’s out for a significant period of time, Florida’s season will be in jeopardy.

by The Bengal on Sep 26, 2009 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bama looked good on defense today.

They look like tops in the league right now to me.

by artiger on Sep 26, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about LSU Tigers.
Start posting about the Tigers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Matty_ott_small
Jefferson stepping up?
Got_les_small
LSU’s Mythical Mad Hatter: Separating Facts From Fiction For Les Miles
Pb140006_small
RUMOR: Ensminger for TE/QB coach
Small
Who gets #18?  Murphy.
Small
2010 Recruiting class Highlight Video
Small
I was heading to NOLA for Mardi Gras when...
Small
2010 LSU Basketball Recruiting Class - Andre Stringer
Fiddler_on_the_roof_fiddler_1__small
From RockyTopTalk.com-Tennessee reportedly loses J.C. Copeland to LSU
Small
If you could bring back one Tiger from the 2000's for next year's team, who would it be?
Alabama_logo2_small
Really ESPN?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter: Coach Mainieri

follow CPM on Twitter

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Ohio State head coach Jim Tressel, left, jokes with offensive lineman Bryant Browning (70) before taking the team picture during an NCAA college football media day, Thursday, Aug,13, 2009, in Columbus, Ohio. (AP Photo/Terry Gilliam)

Jim Tressel Receives Two-Year Contract Extension, No Raise

The offensive line is reflected in the visor of Wisconsin running back John Clay during the second half of an NCAA football game against Michigan, Saturday, Nov. 14, 2009, in Madison, Wis. (AP Photo/Morry Gash) link

Wisconsin RB John Clay Will Miss Entire Spring Season

South Florida's Mike Ford carries the ball against Northern Illinois University Huskies during the International Bowl NCAA college football game in Toronto on Saturday, Jan. 2, 2010. Ford ran for a career-high 207 yards and scored one touchdown in their 27-3 win. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Chris Young) link

USF Dismisses RB Mike Ford

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Pb140006_small PodKATT

Editors

Gse_multipart30441_small Richard Pittman

Me_and_beer_small Poseur

Lsu_logo_small Purple Reign

Photo_small Dane Noble

Authors

Dduzcaz8lg8xca1e9umxcayb6h89casec7jycanko951caqq3246cavdxhrccam82axacat2kr9qca2oz3rsca64takzcaw0toprca4hx60mcahrmqq0cad7ixvgcayr1dn9cahuxjuicaeieutgca3t3udbcaeieq7pca2s0zi6_small Tortfeasor

Koolaid_small Jrlz

Official Partner of CBS Sports