Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Shootings Near Thunder's Arena Follow Win Over Lakers

Who Are We?

This seems to be Les Miles Referendum Week here at ATVS and throughout the Tiger Nation, so let's just give into it. 

Before we do that, I want to echo what 4.0 Point Stance said in the comments of Richard's post: it's less fun to be an LSU fan.  Climbing the mountain is far more fun than trying to stay there.  I've told this story before, but I will say it again: when we were in the midst of the Hallman Era, I promised to never complain about an 8-win season.  Not because I don't want success, but winning 8 games every year IS success.  But now that we've tasted wine for the champion's cup, well, 8 wins don't seem so great anymore. 

Yet LSU Jonno also makes a great point.  It's not overall wins, it's SEC wins.  By that standard, which is a fair standard, LSU was a 3-5 team last year.  We've said it many times here: the only thing a team can control is winning a conference title, national titles require luck.  Just ask a Penn St fan if merely going undefeated is good enough (seriously, THREE undefeated seasons without a title?  That's crazy). 

So, it really comes down to this: Who Are We?

Is it reasonable to expect the SEC Championship Game every year?  Or every other year?  I think most people would answer no.  I do think it reasonable, especially given our recruiting classes as of late, to expect this team to COMPETE for a SEC West title every year, which is why last year really was an abject failure. 

What is success at LSU?  Is it 10 wins every year?  Is it to always be in the national title hunt?  If these goals are not met, is it reasonable to demand the coach's head on a platter?  These are honest questions, as LSU has never had its defining coach.  By almost any reasonable measure, Miles is one of the most successful coaches in LSU history and 2005-2007 are the best three consecutive seasons in the program's history.  Is this sustainable?

I think what is going on right now is not so much a referendum on Miles, but a re-evaluation of what constitutes success at LSU.  And the fanbase is understandably split on this issue, mainly because no one is truly articulating that is what we are arguing about.  Is LSU the new Florida, a program that was a sleeping giant, now awake and ready to dominate on a fairly consistent basis?  Or is this recent run of success just a little out of the norm, and we'll regress back to our traditional level with Tennessee and Georgia, just below the elite of the elite programs.  CFB Data Warehouse ranks LSU as the #9 program of all-time, as a frame of reference. 

What do we want?  Is nine wins good enough, with the occasional run at a national title?  Or is that thinking too small?  Should LSU fans now demand regular trips to Atlanta and consistent top ten finishes?  Is the failure to reach these goals a fireable offense?

I'm genuinely asking, feel free to use the comments to continue this battle for the LSU fan's soul.  I will tell you where I completely part company with those who demand nothing but excellence: LSU is 4-0 right now and I think we all agree there are still issues with this team.  No one denies that.  What I don't get is being upset ALREADY about the Georgia and Florida games, even though those games haven't even happened yet. 

Some fans have already gotten angry over a Georgia loss, and if it actually happens, they've been living that loss for five weeks.  Why make yourself live that misery?  Even the very best teams win 10 to 12 times a year.  Why rob yourself of the enjoyment of those wins?  Wins are precious and should be celebrated.  If your first reaction to Mississippi State was "we're gonna lose to Georgia", take a deep breath and remember to celebrate the win.  Wins don't come around all that often given the short football schedule, and if we don't appreciate them, the football gods may see fit to take those wins away again. 

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good Post

I like the way you have framed this discussion. I was just talking w/ a friend about this yesterday. Before you can say anything about our current situation, you must first decide what you expect our program to be on a year in , year out basis.

by Zandor435 on Sep 28, 2009 5:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Well....

I believe that we can only hold Les Miles truly accountable if we have almost unrefutable evidence that he isn’t using the talent that he’s recruited on a consistent basis. Let’s remember, Miles has been an excellent recruiting coach, and generally has been good at making big-picture adjustments. Look at Ohio State’s coach—Tressel is not as good as a coach as Les Miles because it has taken him quite some time to move away from slow running games. Miles has recruited pretty well, but he has also recruited into a new era of football. Chad Jones and Patrick Peterson are clearly studs. So is Shepard.

But is he coaching poorly? I’m not sure. He’s made one large mistake—trusting that one QB would be enough for a few years (RP). It haunts the team even today. IF JJ were now in his junior year, I think he’d be a much better QB, and we’d be able to have a much more complete game. Honestly, we gave Lee just as much if not more leeway last year. Jefferson is almost in the same boat as Lee. And Miles made some great play calls two years ago—knowing that going for it on 4th down was the right thing to do, and sticking to that judgment, is a mark of a good coach. And those teams did not typically play very sloppy games—which is what we’re seeing now, for the most part. If the sloppiness gets fixed, I think this team has the talent to get 10 wins. I don’t really see too much to blame on Miles, especially if you average it out over two or more years. I think people are upset not so much at the coaching, but the dominating performance we used to see, and are projecting that onto the coach. Meyer is considered a better coach—but even he made a terrible mistake and got his star QB blown up. That could still destroy their season, and Tebow’s career (though hopefully he gets better). Every coach makes mistakes.

Also, who would you put in his place? Most of the best coaches are in the SEC already, and I think Miles has adjusted to the SEC type of football play. He has a better resume than most of the coaches out there. Michigan would love him. Hell, Tennessee would love him. Give the man a little time. We’re still on track for the season. We’ll see.

by Andrew Tessier on Sep 28, 2009 5:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Very well said

If you saw my last rant that I posted on RP’s blog earlier – it was that if the football gods punish us with the second coming of Curley Hullman we will have gotten what we deserve.

But here is the most important thing you said: “Some fans have already gotten angry over a Georgia loss, and if it actually happens, they’ve been living that loss for five weeks.”

Indeed, many LSU fans have this fatalistic personality trait that synaptically (sub-consciously) forces them to expect failure. While their conscious person remembers all the recent success and doesn’t think we should fail. Having already seen the calamity (though it hasn’t actually happened) in their heads they act/react as if it has.

So many have decided that we can’t possibly win another game therefore Les has to go for losing six or eight games, that bastard.

WAKE UP people – we haven’t lost a game!

Will we lose this week-end, I personally don’t think so but what if we do? Is that the ‘final straw’ after all it will be proof that he can never win another game right?

I am almost ashamed to be a tiger fan right now – I’m as proud as I have ever been with the football team and coaching staff and couldn’t be more optimistic of the team’s future but I am ashamed of how we are treating our Damn Fine (and by gawd, loyal!) football coach!

Oh, one other question tiger fans – if you were one of the top recruits in the country and were being recruited by all of the big name programs what would you do to help you learn about the school, team, environment? Would you get on the internet, maybe check out some blogs? What would you think if the fans were calling for an undefeated coach to be fired? When you went on a recruiting visit and watched the fans BOO a true freshman off the field, what would you think? When you looked around in the middle of the third quarter in a close game against a conference foe and the stadium was half empty, what would you think?

You’d probably think, that Miles guy seems like a great coach and he sure has been successful but you know Alabama gets 97,000 fans at their spring game and they don’t leave the stadium until they get thrown out, and I doubt they’d ever boo me off the field, let call Nick one more time before I decide…

GEAUX TIGERS!!!

by SouthernMan on Sep 28, 2009 6:13 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm embarrassed for those LSU fans that just don't get it

Sports in general is meant to be a friendly competition and a celebration of human strength, athleticism, skill and determination.

If it means more to you than that, you are probably an athlete, and that is understandable because success in sports can mean money and pride.

You’re not an athlete? Then you might want to take a moment and analyze why it’s so important to you.

Do you draw a lot of pride from your sports team as if it was you that accomplished something and not the players? Is hearing it from your asshole Bama fan neighbor just too painful from you? Do you feel that need to win a message board argument?

You might want to try doing something productive and take pride in that. I take pride in the fact that I’m a good student and a good guitar player, not in the fact that my college football team beat Mississippi State.

If you verbally insult a football player the way the Ole Miss blog did a few days ago, why is that? Do you feel entitled to better play from that player, and you’re unwilling to be patient while that player develops? You think you look like anything other than a prick by dissing a player from the comfort and safety of your computer?

If you think Les Miles give a damn about what the rant or what this blog has to say, think again. Les is undoubtedly thinking about his team ALL THE TIME. What happened last weekend, how to stop Georgia, what that player is doing wrong, etc. He doesn’t need the rant to tell him anything except how little the fans really know. SO MUCH goes on on a football team, and the fans see so little of it. What the rant doesn’t get to see, they fill with vapid speculation. I guarantee you that 80% of the complaints about Les Miles are based purely on rant speculation gems like “Les is messing with Crowton’s playcalling” and “There’s no way Les will fire Mallveto”. The other 20% of them are usually legitimate comments because Les is not perfect. No coach is perfect, and this is the area where friendly, rational discussion on the football team comes in. That’s where this blog comes in.

This isn’t to say there isn’t a time when the fan should be concerned. If I was a Colorado, Illinois or Virginia fan, I would be very, very concerned. If LSU was 1-3 or 2-2, I would be concerned. For the state of Louisiana, LSU football is also a huge source of income, and consistent success on the field will keep the income flowing. On that level, we are doing more than fine, and you really shouldn’t be worried about the bottom falling out of the LSU football cookie jar.

Winning is a lot more fun than losing, but if winning isn’t enough for you, and the team must DOMINATE for you to be satisfied, I feel sorry for you.

If you’re pissed at the team because it won but didn’t cover the spread, try a gambling hot line.

College football is a time for fans to get together, tailgate and have fun. In the end, the game itself is just a game, and that’s all. If it’s more to you than that, you might want to examine your priorities.

Jrlz rhymes with Charles.

by Jrlz on Sep 28, 2009 6:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks

I’ve been saving those thoughts for awhile.

I once was one of those fans that would get too upset. I’ve acted like an infant in public. Multiple times. I’ve smashed an umbrella after the lost basketball game against Xavier. I slammed a pizza box on a table in the middle of the Union repeatedly during the March Madness loss to UNC, and I demanded that Trent Johnson send somebody to stomp on Ty Lawson’s toe. I also threw a remote across the basement during the College World Series. It doesn’t work anymore.

I’ve made a big change in philosophy, and now I’m a “here for the party” type of fan. I do have my thoughts, but I know my place as a fan and a blogger.

Jrlz rhymes with Charles.

by Jrlz on Sep 28, 2009 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well said.

Like I said yesterday. We won……………….

by Totally Spoil on Sep 29, 2009 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'll see your Curly Hallman

and raise you Jerry Stovall.

I would love for LSU to win the West every year and complete for National Championships, but realistically the SEC is too competitive for that to happen.

My personal minimum threshold is 9-3 regular season. That works out to three cupcake wins, one competitive OOC BCS level game tossup, and a 6-2 or 5-3 conference record. A single season dip below that is understandable, but I also would expect us to win the West every 2-4 years and the conference about every 4 years.

2 seasons in a row below 9-3 is cause for concern and a third season is when I join the torches and pitchforks crowd. If we’re consistently below 9-3 we’re losing out of conference games every year and/or finishing 4-4 in the SEC. I’m not even close to calling for Miles’ head yet. Now another 2-6 or 3-5 faceplant in conference play this year? I’m going to be getting antsy. At that point, I would say the coach is on the hot seat. But 4-0 after one 8-5 season? No way.

And it seems that many of the people yelling for Miles’ head right now are big Saban fans. His five year record? 8-4, 10-3, 8-5, 13-1, 9-3. Miles’ worst season so far at LSU is exactly the same record as St. Nick’s. Let’s please not get the reputation of running off good coaches because they can’t go 8-0 in the SEC every year.

by The Bengal on Sep 28, 2009 6:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Happy, Glad and Sad

God bless us every one for living so vicariously through the program we love so much. Having said that, looking back on the last four weeks and ahead I add my two cents – four actually:

1. I am happy at this point that without regard to opponents or play LSU is 4-0 and 2-0.
2. I am glad that we are NOT – USC, Ole Miss, VA Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, BYU. Oregon, Cal, Penn State and a myriad of others – and yes, even Georgia who we play this Saturday. Each of these lost to inferior opponents because of their play or lack thereof. To date, the play of this unit or that unit on our beloved Tigers has not bit us in our – rather their – royal arses. I would rather be LSU than all of those other one loss teams that have proven they were overrated on one particular day.
3. I am sad when I see the lack of fire and intensity as THE constant for 60 minutes. It is that fire and directed anger, especially by the defense, that defines greatness in football. I have not seen a Chad Lavalais, Kyle Williams, Bradie James or other great firebrands. Where is that man who is both example and leader? Even the players from the 2007 team that are still playing seem to be a half-step slower or a little less strong. Win or lose one expects to see dynamic explosive effort every play in every game. That is all I can ask. I can tell you from the stands and in my living room it just doesn’t seem that way. I admit I could be wrong.
4. LSU has control of every goal and dream in their own hands and play on the field. If they can find fire for their belly and then play angry, play violent and play disciplined.

I think that if we are satisfied with anything less than having a legitimate opportunity at championships, then we sell ourselves and the program short. I also think that if the coaches and players give it all up in the effort to win and do so with the character that ought to define LSU sports, we salute them for the effort and thank them for the sacrifice they make to us so that we can cheer them on.

GEAUX Tigers!

by SmokingFrog on Sep 28, 2009 6:31 PM CDT reply actions  

I'll keep it short..

My personal expectation is about 9-10 wins (usually equates to competing for the SEC West) on a year to year basis, but more importantly being competitive in our ballgames.

No one should be counting losses for this team on the strength of how the MSU game played out. We are in the SEC and wins in this conference are at a premium, no matter what the betting line is saying.

Did anyone notice how excited the players were after the goal-line stand. That’s what makes football special man. If the players can be excited about it, you may want to take some time to enjoy it as well.

There are problems on this team and discussion of it can be healthy, but some are being critical just for the sake of being critical. And Jrlz is right some have agendas as to why they are SO critical.

by Mikeno on Sep 28, 2009 7:23 PM CDT reply actions  

As far as the National Title being luck

It isn’t. Not in the SEC anyways. The winner of our conference, provided they have the same record as at least the #2 team in the country, will get into the NC. If an SEC team goes undefeated, they go to the NC. It has been that way for about the last 4 years and will continue for probably at least the next 3, after that it’s just too hard to know.

by Ianoka on Sep 28, 2009 8:09 PM CDT reply actions  

A Doc Sat dig at the polls...and the futillity of LSU football over the last 18 months:

“It is September, and earnest poll-gazing is premature, to say the least. But a month into the season, is it too much to ask the AP, coaches and Harris polls reflect the slightest shred of common sense?

• LSU is No. 4. Because … ? The Tigers are not only playing mediocre football right now, going to the wire to beat Washington and Mississippi State on either end of ho-hum wins over Vanderbilt and Louisiana-Lafayette, but they don’t even have that much inertia in their favor: This was an 8-5 team that had to stage a frantic comeback against Troy to fend off a full-fledged, four-game November slide last year, had a losing conference record and didn’t even make it into the final top 25. This year, the Tiger offense currently ranks 105th nationally and needed an interception return, a punt return and a goal line stand to get out of Starkville unscathed.

How does a statistically average team with no particularly impressive wins to offset two extremely sketchy ones, coming off a thoroughly mediocre season, land in everyone’s top five? Is anyone paying attention?"

by TigerPaw on Sep 28, 2009 9:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Wow

That pisses me off that he says we had to “go to the wire” to beat Washington. Is he paying attention, or did he just see the final score?

by Ianoka on Sep 28, 2009 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was just thinking that.

I will be the first to admit LSU is not the #4 team in the country. We are probably closer to the 10-15 range. But keep the criticism valid please! Jeez.

Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.
St. Louis vegetarian blog

by Gregatron on Sep 29, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

What people need to understand

Is that empires fall — throughout all of history there never has been, and there never will be an exception to this rule.

Now, the way that translates to football is simple — everybody rebuilds, there are no exceptions. The only question is the degree of said rebuilding. What do you call USC’s offense this year? They couldn’t crack 20 points against Ohio State and Washington — when was the last time that happened in back to back weeks? Look at Florida in 2007 — they had to replace 10 starters on defense and had a terrible terrible pass defense. The only reason they managed to win 9 games was having a quarterback who put together the single greatest season anybody in this conference has ever had.

Georgia in 2006. Ohio State in 2004. Oklahoma in 2005 or Texas in 2007. It’s just a question of where those new starters are being broken in at, and how that affects you relative to the rest of your schedule. LSU has its own example of this in 2006 — an offensive line with three new starters succumbed to two teams with veteran defensive lines, Auburn and Florida, before coming together to become a pretty damn good outfit by the end of the season.

What this ultimately means is that EVERYBODY will have down years. You think Florida will never have another multi-loss season? Wait till next year when they have to replace Tebow, Spikes, Cooper and whatever underclassmen that may leave early ( and Hernandez, Haden, Wright and Dunlap would all be high enough draft choices to make it worth considering). Sure, Florida’s got plenty of talent, but talent requires seasoning — in this league, sometimes that seasoning comes with losses. Most of the time there’s a fine line between those wins and those losses. And just a few mistakes may be the difference between three, four or five losses.

This isn’t to say everything should be forgiven at all times. There is no question things have to improve with this LSU football team. But those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it and if LSU fans don’t learn to show patience, this cycle will absolutely continue to repeat with any and all future coaches.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 28, 2009 9:17 PM CDT reply actions  

Diagnosing the LSU psyche ...

First I just want to say great blog, I’m glad I stumbled on it a few months ago and now onto my first post.

I think there are a number of things contributing to the level of discontent among the Tiger faithful that have set some back to the pre Saban catastrophe syndrome. Here are my thoughts on the situation.

Problem 1: 8-5 doesn’t taste good and 4 games in it still tastes like we drank a glass of merlot, a can of pbr, and 4 shots of Canadian Club last night and woke up with Chernobyl in our mouth. If this team would have blown up ULL, like we used to blow up teams like ULL we would all be seeing “progress” instead of doom and gloom.

Solution: Win at Georgia. Win ugly, win pretty, win late … just win and the same detractors this week will be predicting a Tebowless win over Florida next week.

Problem 2: The problem areas on this team (O-Line namely) aren’t places where we are used to seeing problems. We have had a very long run of dominate line play and we don’t know how to handle poor line play. That poor line play is causing the offense to stutter and an ugly win at State.

Solution: Take a deep breath and focus on the signs of improvement no matter how small. There are signs of improvement from week to week and this will be a completely different team come Thanksgiving.

Problem 3: 2008 had no wins in big games. LSU lost every big game (minus the bowl) it played in. That’s no fun ever. Fans live to celebrate a huge win over a higher ranked team, and to rub it in to your biggest rival. We didn’t get to do that last year. There was no joy at someone else’s expense and that adds to the misery of what was “only” 8-5.

Solution: None. The team needs to win big games. Big games are what define a program look at OSU and OU and their national respect in big games. It is completely reasonable for the fans to demand big wins every season. Again, win at UGA and this will go away.

Now we head into the deeper areas of the LSU psyche, the long standing fears that were just below the surface for a while and are bubbling up now.

Problem: Saban, Alabama, Florida, Ole Miss etc. LSU fans are incredibly sensitive to the smallest slight taken against their Tigers. How dare anyone even suggest that Ole Miss, OLE MISS is better than LSU? And I think we all know about the Saban problem and how he has Bama back so fast. I think LSU fans are so desperate to be viewed in a positive light that the first sign of a problem with the team is cause to jump into the deep end.

Solution: Forget about Saban. I know this is especially hard for some people, but he is never coming back to LSU and he will most likely be at Bama for a long time. The easy way to do this is beat him at his own game. Fence off the state and beat his ass on the field. Another way to get rid of this problem is to get some Bravado! We are LSU, we are a damn good football program, we have 2 crystal balls, we don’t care about your flash in the pan, Ole Miss!

My expectations are for this team to win at least 9 games a year. Sure there will be some 8 win years, but they need to be years apart. I expect a winning record in conference every year. I expect to be in the hunt for the SECW every year and win the SEC somewhere in the once every 3-4 year frequency. I expect to win big games every year.

I think that is a very fair expectation level for this University. With the in-state players, the money that is available, the facilities, the fans there is no University that beats LSU in those combined categories, of course some others match us, but no one is better. Everything is in place to be very good for a very long time and I am of the opinion that last year will be seen as an aberration in the long term.

LSU wins at UGA this week by 3 in an ugly game with the D coming up big with a few turnovers from turnover prone UGA. Sorry if I got carried away in my long post.

by tigerarchitect on Sep 28, 2009 11:06 PM CDT reply actions  

Deep

Thoughtful post, Poseur.

Broadly, I think of success as progress year to year. The 2004 season was a really frustrating one because of how dominant the 2003 team was. Oregon State, Auburn, Georgia, Troy, Ole Miss, Iowa … all frustrating games, and we only lost three of them. I can’t say that was a 9-win season I was satisfied with. I was much more satisfied with 8 wins in 2000, because of where we were coming from. That was a very successful year in the context of 1999.

The Miles era is complicated. Clearly the team was very successful by most measures from 2005-2007. But there’s been this consistent lack of dominance game to game that I think leads to this sense of impending (relative) doom. You can find games – wins and losses – each year that were just not the performance that was reasonably expected. And to stay at the level of success (wins) LSU has shown since 2003, there’s not a lot of room for error.

The 2007 team was a perfect example. The Arkansas loss did not cost us a shot at the SEC title, but it was a fluke that we made it to the BCS title game with two losses. And before somebody comes back with crap for me saying that, we were absolutely the most-deserving two-loss team. But it took Pitt upsetting West Virginia for us to make that game; otherwise the Arkansas loss kills us in the BCS.

So I think there was justifiable frustration from the Arkansas game in 2007 (though on balance the team’s performance that season was much more dominant than 2005 or 2006) even though we won the title. It made that title just slightly less satisfying. And then 2008 happened and real concern started to grow.

Maybe we slide back to being an 8- or 9-game winner most years. It’s possible that could happen just from the rise of other programs in the SEC. That would be tough to take from a “success” level we’re at now, but we now have very high expectations in a very tough conference.

What I look for as success game to game is good execution. I don’t expect or demand a win every week – I hope that’s not who we are. I wasn’t bothered by our loss to Alabama last year. With what our QB situation had become, where Alabama was as a program and how we played, I can easily accept that loss. But I was really bothered by our win over Troy for obvious reasons.

This week’s game at Georgia is one I think is winnable with good execution and losable with bad execution. If we go in and execute well and win, that will be great. If we execute well and lose to Georgia because they were better, that’s OK. If we execute poorly and win, I won’t be satisfied with that. Happy with it, but unsatisfied because poor execution eventually catches up with you (see 2008).

I think that’s a pretty rational way to look at it and keep a healthy perspective. I guess a lot of people would say I should be happy with any win and just move on, and it’s probably a product of LSU’s success that it’s not that simple. But I think that’s OK.

by Cap'n Ken on Sep 28, 2009 11:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks for the replies

Really, some thoughtful replies from the ATVS community. You guys really came through. I’m kind of proud of this post, not for the content, but that it sparked such thoughtful dialogue.

There’s no right answer, but it is interesting to see where we all stand in our expectations. It’s where all criticism has to start (what did you expect?). However, Ken, we know the only reason LSU lost to Arkansas was because I was at the game.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Sep 29, 2009 7:36 AM CDT reply actions  

Ha

I went to the Auburn and Georgia games in 2004 and came close to bailing out of the Florida game because of the effect of my presence at the first two. But it was a trip with a good Gator friend of mine who booted his wife for that game so he could take me and show off the Florida experience. And we won.

And as an aside, that’s a great thing about SEC football. Especially living in Atlanta, you know people from pretty much every school. I’ve showed off what I love about LSU football down in Baton Rouge and have been hosted at several campuses with fans who want to do the same.

by Cap'n Ken on Sep 29, 2009 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I say you send Les Miles to Lexington

We’ll take him off your hands…..

First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...

by btcoop71 on Sep 29, 2009 8:34 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree, good post.

I think much of the backlash is due to fear.

Since 2001, we’ve won the west in every odd numbered year. When you compare our level of play to other teams in the west, it looks like 2009 may not be our year.

Since 2002, even in years that we didn’t win the west, we were always only 1 win short of winning the west. Now this is often the case with all 2nd or 3rd place teams in the West, but the point is we were in the race all season.

Until 2008, we hadn’t had a losing season in the SEC since 1999. We were officially out of the SEC West race after the Alabama loss. With respect to the primary goal of our season “Win the West” the rest of our games were meaningless.

So I think as fans, we want to be playing meaningful games late in the season. Meaningful to win the West, meaningful to win the SEC championship, and meaningful to go to BCS bowls. We didn’t have that type of season last year, and it was the first time in a long time that we didn’t. LSU has been an elite program for so long now, that we likely have many fans who have not experienced anything but winning, and being a dominant football team. We will likely be staring at our longest absence from Atlanta in 10 years after this season. That is hard for a lot of people to handle.

Have we already bounced back after last year’s disappointing season? Or will it take another season…or two…or three?

LSU fans still know how to win, but we’ve forgotten how to lose.

by LSU Jonno on Sep 29, 2009 8:44 AM CDT reply actions  

Very Good Point Jonno
I think much of the backlash is due to fear.

But a lot of that fear is based on what’s happening in Tuscaloosa right now, which is retarded. The last time LSU made a coaching decision based on what was happening at Alabama, it took 6 tries over 20 years to find another good coach.

Again, learn from history or risk repeating it.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 29, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

In fairness

I think most people are trying to learn from history, we have just drawn different conclusions. The lesson I have drawn is don’t fire a coach for consistent success because you want to win 10 games every season instead. Other people have drawn the opposite lesson, that we need to be constantly vigilant for any slide into mediocrity. In this view, firing Miles is not firing McLendon it is firing Dinardo before the crash.

I think they are wrong, but I at least understand their view. It’s still fear.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Sep 29, 2009 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

But people need to understand

That one season, or maybe even two, doesn’t equal a “slide into mediocrity.”

Obviously how things will play out the rest of this season is going to factor into everything, but if the atmosphere around Baton Rouge gets more toxic, it’ll only create a self-fulfilling prophecy.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 29, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Good point LSU Jonno

Also, good point Billy. I agree with both of you. It is all fear, and that fear is compounded by a potential replacement. It would be different if Bama wasn’t playing so well. It’s harder to unseat “the team to beat” than take an empty spot. If Bama continues to win the west then we can’t. I do however, think the fear comes from the fans who don’t know how to lose, but also from the fans that sat through the losing season. Even though I was younger and didn’t care as much as I do now. I hated sitting through the early 90’s. I would never want that again. The difference I think between then and now is that more people care about the program and we know how to right the ship if it ever went down. All of that being said, I’m waiting this year to see how it turns out before I start getting too upset.

The guy got us a NC just 2 years ago and to expect another one is difficult. I agree with Jonno that it is all about the SEC. Your goal has to be an SEC championship, the NC only happens when the cards fall your way.

That being said, I thought last year was bad. If we have the same results this year then that will also be bad. It also sucks for Miles that we have, in my opinion, a more difficult SEC schedule this year. I’m heading to Athens this weekend and really hoping we pull out a win. I might just have to wear 2 lucky shirts at the same time.

by Bob Barker on Sep 29, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

I might just have to wear 2 lucky shirts at the same time.

Classic

by LSU Jonno on Sep 29, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Competative

My measure of success is if LSU is competative in all the games it plays. I don’t care about the spread, I don’t care about style points, I want the team to line up and compete. If LSU had played close games in all its losses last year, 5 losses would have been ok. If LSU plays close against Georgia, Florida, Auburn, Alabama, and Ole Miss, the season will have been a good one regardless of the win-loss. If we are playing close, we are bound to win 2 or 3 of those games, but the ball bounces funny and strange things happen. Do I wish we were blowing out every team we play? Sure. It is just not realistic and if that is your measuring stick you are not going to enjoy the good football LSU will play this season.

by Jababin on Sep 29, 2009 10:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Respectfully disagree

I agree that wins are wins, but when the team plays down to the competition, it’s frustrating for all of us. We were competitive in the Troy and Arkansas games, but I don’t think anyone was satisfied with either of those games. That’s why the Peach Bowl result was so heartening. It seemed like the whole team got their fire and spirit back.

Since then, it looks like the same lackluster, play down to the competition effort we saw in the second half of last season. I want them to be competitive with good teams and win comfortably with bad teams. We shouldn’t give up last possession TDs to Washington or need punt return TDs and goal line stands to beat Miss. State. It’s frustrating because we know they’re capable of great results. Yes, we’re replacing some key OL and defensive players, but we returned 16 of 22 starters. This is largely the same team we saw in the Peach Bowl. We just need the same effort we saw then.

by The Bengal on Sep 29, 2009 1:29 PM CDT reply actions  

Oops.

That was supposed to be a reply to Jababin.

by The Bengal on Sep 29, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

What I expect

I would love for LSU to be the cream of the crop, but I’m not sure our “natural” place in the college football ecosystem is to be the very tip top of the foodchain (as we have been this decade). I think (hope) we are a notch below that.

The thing is, all programs wax and wane — see Nebraska, Miami, Notre Dame, Florida State. College football has lots of variance. Once upon a time int he 90s, North-friggin;-western was going to the Rose Bowl. For some perspective: imagine Vanderbilt going to the Sugar Bowl!

I would like us to be consistently win 6 games in the SEC, and put together mostly nine to ten win seasons, and win the SEC outright every five years or so, and go to the Cotton Bowl or better two out of five years. Honestly, I would like a bit better than that, but I think that might be LSU’s “proper” place. But again, there is a lot of variance. We will go through stretches where we do much better (2003-2007) and stretches where we don’t do as well.

Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.
St. Louis vegetarian blog

by Gregatron on Sep 29, 2009 2:18 PM CDT reply actions  

natural place is rooted in natural resources

As I stated in my earlier post LSU has all the resources to be a consistent elite program in the nation. Other teams might have equal facilities, equal fan support, equal recruiting ground, but very few have all 3 and no one has all 3 better than LSU. Those are the building blocks for a power program and we have the luxury of having that in place. Coaching is a huge part of the equation and can easily poison the water as we know all too well, but it doesn’t take the second coming to steer this program in the right direction. A good manager, with good assistant coaches can lead this team to very good things for a very long time. Of course things won’t go as planned all the time, but over the long term this University should be elite.

by tigerarchitect on Sep 30, 2009 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think people overestimate our financial capacities..

We may have the facilities right now, but I don’t think we could keep up in a facilities arms race with Bama or Florida, and probably not Tennessee or Georgia. Our TAF does not get nearly the money that Bama’s equivalent gets. Right now, that arms race hasn’t fully developed, but you can already see that LSU has outstripped Ole Miss and Mississippi State and some other schools that can’t keep up with us. But when Bama and Florida decide to really flex their monetary muscle, they’ll leave us behind.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Sep 30, 2009 6:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree.

I think UF and Bama have all 3 of those aspects at or better than LSU’s level.

That is why it is in LSU’s best interest for Auburn to be good. They need to keep Bama in check.

by LSU Jonno on Sep 30, 2009 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I said the same thing a couple years ago..

it was in LSU’s best interest for Alabama to be good. I didn’t expect them to come back this far this fast though.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Sep 30, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

History will repeat!

It’s over, LSU beat Georgia 26 – 23!!

I’m serious, I just watched it….. On ESPN Classic.

It was a ‘toss up’ according to the experts, LSU was ranked 6th but had a suspect line and the running game just wasn’t clicking so a lot of people were suspicious of the ranking and grumbling was afoot already for the new head coach (Mike Archer) who hadn’t yet lost a game.

On the other hand UGA had one loss to a good Clemson team and was fairly battle tested having beaten OSU, UVA, Ole Miss, USC (Carolina) and was ranked 16th in the country.

With the game being betwixt the hedges a lot of people, including a lot of fatalistic Tiger fans, no doubt, were picking the dawgs.

Despite trailing for most of game the Dawgs intercepted a Tommy Hodson pass late in the 4th quarter. With a short field the Dawgs pushed in for the go ahead score 23-19 w/ less than 5 minutes on the clock.

Lee Corso said the Tigers were going to have to depend on their passing game as they couldn’t run the ball on UGA all day.

So much for that. Hodson and Fuller led the Tigers down field and scored they scored the go ahead touchdown with about four minutes left.

UGA then drove right down the field as time was starting to run out on the clock, very close to field goal range and still driving on 2nd and 5, Kevin Guidry intercepted a pass and the Tigers ran out the clock!

Tiger Win, Tigers Win, Tigers Win!!!!

GEAUX TIGERS!!!

by SouthernMan on Sep 29, 2009 3:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about LSU Tigers. Best viewed in Wide mode

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Lm_deal_small
The Curious Case of Jordan Jefferson
Lsuavatar_small
The "Tipping Point" for Playoff
Small
A sad day in Tiger Nation
Steeler_small
Question About Michael Brockers
Imag0299_small
Morris Claiborne NFL Draft Profile Video
76224_20070106130217_small
KJ Malone commits to LSU at Spring Game
Grabboavatar_small
A Student's Perspective on Thursday's Open Practice
Tower_small
LSU Spring Game/ATVS Meet-&-Greet?
Small
Feheko Fanaika?
76224_20070106130217_small
John Diarse Commits

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

LSU Baseball

42-14

Conference

19-11

Streak

W1

SEC Baseball Standings

Last Update: May 19

# - SEC Tournament Seeding

Team Name = Eliminated from SEC Tournament


Managing Editor / Chief Lackey

Pb140006_small PodKATT

Editors

Gse_multipart30441_small Richard Pittman

Me_and_beer_small Poseur

Tower_small Billy Gomila

Paulcrewe_small Paul Crewe

Authors

Mike_snow_small actioncuse