LSU 31 - Washington 23: My Final Thoughts Before Moving On to Vandy
I watched the game again, and because I was watching it on the ESPNU replay, they didn't cut away to Rece Davis in the studio, and instead I got to see Terrence Toliver's first touchdown, from the beginning of the play. It was great.
Anyway, on second viewing, some of the things we've talked about already came into somewhat sharper focus. Defensively, we just did not cover the other team well enough in the middle of the field. Usually, if the opponent was on the outside against Peterson, Eugene, or Hawkins, we had pretty solid coverage. Even when Riley had man coverage way on the outside and down the field, the coverage was there. Jake Locker's a really good quarterback, and sometimes he made a perfect throw, and there's nothing that can be done about that other than generate a better pass rush. If the receiver was in the middle of the field in a safety's or linebacker's zone though, he was usually wide open.
In the running game, Washington had a lot of success when they ran misdirection or counters. This tells me that our defensive front seven was playing very aggressively but without much discipline. This is also seen when we would rush the passer and leave big holes for Locker to run through.
You can't really point out any player who didn't perform. Every defender made a play or two, particularly in the linebacker corps. I think you can point to Rahim Alem and say that he should have gotten a better pass rush and you could say that Chad Jones and the three-man rotation at safety (Danny McCray, Brandon Taylor, Karnell Hatcher) was pretty much invisible. And you'd be right.
On second viewing, I saw Josh Downs out there a good bit, and while his play is drawing praise, I can't really say he made any more plays than Charles Alexander or Drake Nevis made (both of whom made plays). He looked like he belonged, but did not look like he stood out. I also say Chancey Aghayere and Lavar Edwards on the ends a fair bit. I never saw Chase Clement or any of members of the Class of 2009 other than Downs.
The linebackers were solid in the running game. Kelvin Sheppard was not a starter, but seemed to get as much time as the other starters other than Harry Coleman, who was in the game for virtually every play as far as I could tell. Other than Cutrera's interception and Riley's nice coverage on a wheel route, the linebackers were pretty much invisible in the passing game.
Offensively, I think I can diagnose the problem with the power running game. It was the offensive line. The holes just weren't there. Charles Scott ran as hard as ever, and when there was a hole he got through it. If the problem was on the center-left guard I would be very concerned, as these are new starters T-Bob Hebert and Josh Dworaczyk. However, it seemed to be the line as a whole, which tells me it may just be a game-specific thing. We get another chance against a defensive front seven we should be able to overmatch next week when we play Vandy. We'll see how that goes.
When we ran option or ran to the outside, we had a lot of success. Jordan Jefferson really runs the option well. He did not make one bad decision in the outside zone or the inside zone when deciding whether to keep the ball or give it up. That's not to say every decision was right. He certainly needs to avoid taking big hits.
The passing game could not have been more basic. At no time did we try to get the ball down the field to an outside receiver, except for Lafell's touchdown. We ran a lot of short passes, passes to running backs, and a couple of throws to the tight end. Early in the game, Jefferson was not particularly accurate, but he settled down and started hitting his targets.
One area I would like to see an athletic, mobile quarterback like Jefferson improve is in his ability to make a play when the protection breaks down. Sometimes, when the protection wasn't there, Jefferson would scramble around but he never made a play. He just bought himself time to get rid of the ball. Maybe the receivers couldn't break open or something else was going wrong, but probably the biggest difference between Locker and Jefferson was that when the play broke down, Locker was able to make something positive happen while Jefferson generally had to just unload the ball out of bounds.
Our special teams play, other than our punting was pretty solid, I thought. Our kickoff coverage was good, and at no time did Washington threaten to break a long one. The kickoff return game took advantage of pooch kicks to get really good field position. We didn't miss a field goal attempt or get a penalty on a return. If we can get better distance on punts, I think special teams will be good.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice write-up
The “invisibility” of our linebackers and safety tells me that they were either a)misreading the offense or b) playing a scheme which the other team destroyed.
However, you didn’t note any difference in defensive play from the 1st to the 2nd half. It seemed clear we were the far superior team, albeit tired, once certain adjustments were made. Our only problem was staying awake.
Not sure I agree with this Richard
One area I would like to see an athletic, mobile quarterback like Jefferson improve is in his ability to make a play when the protection breaks down. Sometimes, when the protection wasn’t there, Jefferson would scramble around but he never made a play. He just bought himself time to get rid of the ball. Maybe the receivers couldn’t break open or something else was going wrong, but probably the biggest difference between Locker and Jefferson was that when the play broke down, Locker was able to make something positive happen while Jefferson generally had to just unload the ball out of bounds.
What I saw was a quarterback — a very young and inexperienced quarterback I might add — get out of trouble and not screw up. Perhaps the Jarrett Lee experience has made me risk averse, but I like to see JJ scramble and get rid of the ball, taking an incompletion. It shows poise imo. I don’t want him to force anything, because that is where mistakes are made. I agree that I would like to see him make more big plays in the future, but I think a lot of that will come with film study and coaching.
I actually voted for JJ as the player of the game in this poll above. I’m really starting to like this kid a lot. I think you wrote that his ATVS rating was >10, which is excellent. He made no real mistakes (other than his fucktarded Tim Tebow impressions, which I saw CLM giving him a minor chewing out over). He made some very good throws, some excellent runs, and did more than what was expected of him.
Patrick “Patterson” (el-oh-el) was awesome though. Dear god we have a stud there.
Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.
St. Louis vegetarian blog
I agree..
That our O-line could have picked it up a bit, although the Husky defense basically committed to the run and then just prayed that we kept it basic. We could have humiliated this team if we just forced them to defend the whole field. Next game will be a better indicator in my eyes if it’s best for our O-line to utilize more zone blocking schemes rather than man block, because at times we got little to no push against the Husky line. I hope that has more to do with lethargy than any kind of toughness or “beef” issue though, but we’ll see.
It’s a toss-up between PP and TT for player of the game imo. They were both the keys to winning this game. The Huskies may have been better served not throwing Peterson’s way for the entire game, and Toliver just showed his promise by making big plays when we needed them from him. I’ll go with Toliver, he really could have scored more TD’s had we got the ball to him more.
I hope in future weeks we actually give D-Coordinators something to worry about by opening up the pass a little (A LOT) more, one on one our receivers are a difficult match-up for any defense.
Also..
I didn’t quite understand the defense we were playing at times. CJ playing 20 yards deep at times and then the last play of the game really stands out, when it looked like we were in a zone (again) Cutrera let the TE cross him up (as if he was in a man defense) on the seem route he ran. The 10-15 times I’ve watched that play it never seems to not piss me off at how we could have played that infinitely better.
We were in a zone
Cutrera wasn’t playing man, but he got crossed up and let a guy get behind him in his zone. It really wasn’t a terrible play, they just found the hole between 3 zones.
That's just it..
I realized that the rest of the D was in a zone but Cutrera was playing the TE as if he were in man. In a zone you don’t play the receiver, you play the QB. Yet Cutrera turned his back on the QB and trailed the TE almost taking himself out of the play altogether. Thus the conundrum.
I don't know how linebackers play it
but corners in a cover 2 are supposed to turn and run with the receiver if they allow the receiver to get outside of them.
Hmm..
very close vote in this one. I did not expect that.
Those of you who voted “other” please feel free to defend your vote. For everyone else, voting closes when I wake tomorrow and announce a winner.
Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.
How about the LSU fans?
Very very impressive showing by our faithful up there. We were everywhere. I was around Bellevue, Issaquah, you name it – just flooded with folks who made the cross country trip.
(That said, my vote’s for TT.)
How could any defensive player, especially a corner, be the "Player of the Game"?
Locker threw for over 321 yards.
Sure Peterson didn’t miss a tackle once he found his man…and his hits in run support were often dramatic, but how many successful throws were made against him? Also no int’s. The bare minimum would be at least 1 for a CB to get the game ball.
The game ball goes to JJ and it shouldn’t be close.
Peterson played well enough to garner attention..
Peterson made great plays on the quick hitch routes that UW ran, which had it been a lesser DB the play could have gone for more yards. Instead Peterson made great plays on the receiver and most of the gains were minimal, that’s the most you can ask for in those situations. Also I believe he had 3 pass break ups and the fumble recovery. His impact on this game should not be underestimated.
Unbelievable.
Ya’ll didn’t include Cutrera in the game MVP poll. When his TD was practically the difference in the game? Shame on you, Tigernation!
I voted for ‘other’ and that other is our boy Jacob.
If we could just sythesize life in a laboratory, we could prove that the creation of life requires no intelligence.
by Tigernut on Sep 7, 2009 7:01 PM CDT reply actions
Let's face it.
The Huskies didn’t win, but they smacked us real good with almost 500 yards of offense. Cutrera was the lone shining knight that saved what would have surely been a true sweating it nail-biter. His interception and TD turned the game around for us and energized the whole squad.
If we could just sythesize life in a laboratory, we could prove that the creation of life requires no intelligence.
by Tigernut on Sep 7, 2009 7:03 PM CDT reply actions
So there!
If we could just sythesize life in a laboratory, we could prove that the creation of life requires no intelligence.
by Tigernut on Sep 7, 2009 7:04 PM CDT reply actions

by 
















