Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Where Do The Lakers Go From Here?

Post Game Chatter: The Auburn Game

Well, that happened. This won't be a fun one to write. How could it be? Winning is fun. Losing is not. Getting dominated is even worse. Yeah, I said it. We got dominated. This street goes both ways. For the past seven weeks, two close games notwithstanding, I've watched us whip every opponent. We've dominated up front, we've been in control. Even in the games that needed last minute drives to win, we possessed a decided advantage in yards, and were a couple unfortunate turnovers away from being up double digits in those games. But on this Saturday... the roles were reversed. Auburn kicked our ass all over the field Saturday night.

Cam Newton is a special player. I admit, I believed he wouldn't be a fit for Malzahn. I was wrong. No one has cut up our defense like that since Darren McFadden. There's so many painful facets to this game, that it's hard to mention. I don't know what's worse, the fact that we yielded over 500 yards or the fact that we yielded over 400 of them on the ground. Run defense was formerly our hallmark (I'm talking about for the last decade), not this game. There's a lot to discuss this week. There will be plenty hand wringing and head smashing into the wall, but I'll try to put together a few thoughts after the jump. Also after the jump: Cam Newton is still slicing through the LSU defense.

Star-divide

I'll get into gameplans after I watch for a second and third time, but a couple short notes in that regard. 1) I didn't feel Chavis had a bad plan. There were numerous times when I'd see guys right there in position and then one of two things would happen a) Nobody would tackle (90%) or b) Newton would improvise and make a special play. Again, this is without re-watching the game, so I may go back re-watch and feel 100% differently. But as Billy and I have said all week, if we don't tackle, we don't win. We didn't tackle.

Offensively... different story. Throughout the first couple of drives, I thought Gary had actually engineered a hell of a plan. And then, it all came crashing down. Realistically, we were shot in the foot at the end of drives. We have two extremely limited QBs and unfortunately, we hamstrung ourselves by not playing to their strengths. JJ drives us down to the 37 using a nice combination of runs and rollout passes. These are the type of plays he runs well. And then... we decide to stick him in the pocket to try and convert. The results were two horrendous throws, one of which was picked off. 0 points. Why?

JJ made his hay Saturday with his feet. For all the talk of people saying, "JJ isn't a runner and we're trying to make him that!"... You're wrong. He is a runner. He may not be a gazelle like Cam Newton, and he may not be elusive like a Taylor Martinez, but he possesses very strong running ability. If not for his running ability on Saturday, LSU probably only scores three points.

Which brings me to Jarrett Lee. I'm not going to sit here and put the kid on blast. It wasn't fair when some of our "fans" did it to JJ, so it's not fair to do it to Lee. That being said, all those who trumpeted Lee and how worthless JJ is now need to take a step back and realize that maybe our coach wasn't such an idiot at all. He watches these two EVERY DAY. He realizes how severely limited both of them are. I've seen numerous people blaming the wrist injury. Lee looked fine. His ball wasn't any different. Will he be sore today? Sure. But he was well enough to play, so no need to excuse his poor performance. He was off all day. His throws were inaccurate (yes, so were JJ's, but JJ gives us some ground game). We didn't cross the 50 with Lee once.

What strikes me is the irony of the "fans" who said last week that JJ couldn't drive us down the field and couldn't get us in the end zone. The roles were reversed Saturday. Moral of that story: Don't get too brave until you have a known quantity. Lee looked great in spurts for two weeks. But he's played poorly each of the last two weeks. But there's still a bigger thing behind this other than Lee... other than JJ...


Crowton_gary_medium

via www.tigerrag.com

Oh, I think you all probably recognize this randy individual. Only through the magical voo doo of college football could he still be employed and in such a prestigious position. I don't know if I buy the whole "Crowton starts good but gets worse every year argument." I don't know if it's truly a personnel thing (maybe we missed on two QBs in recruiting). I don't know what the issue is. But I do know that our offense has performed miserably over the past two seasons and a half, and we still sport some of the best talent around. I do maintain the opinion that RP leaving cost this team dearly, and other attrition lead to many of our struggles (particularly in 2008 and 2009). But we should be coming out of that now, and our mature, experienced QBs shouldn't be enduring this now. It's time for Gary to go, and I think everyone knows it. I'm of the opinion that Crowton wouldn't be back next season even if we averaged 500 yards, 60 points and went undefeated. The bridges were burned last year, and I have a feeling behind the scenes issues kept the move from being made.

Back to the game, defensively, we were a hot mess. I think Mo Claiborne was the only guy who knew how to tackle Cam Newton. He went after his feet twice, and got him down, all 177 pounds of himself, by himself, twice. Where was this all day? Kelvin Sheppard was basically non-existent. If you've read any of my post game reviews, you know my feelings on Kelvin. I like the guy, and I think he does a good job of getting our guys lined up, but he's not a great linebacker. If you put a blocker on Kelvin, you'll end his day. Tennessee, Florida and Auburn all blocked right at him, and Sheppard failed to be a playmaking force in any of those games. Drake Nevis was outplayed by Nick Fairley. Really, the defense seemed outmatched all day long. K

udos to Malzahn and Chizik and the Auburn staff for having their guys ready to play. They outcoached and outplayed us. I'm not a huge Gene Chizik fan. I think he's a dynamo recruiter who is a bit of a rah-rah coach (but I suppose the same could be said about Les Miles). But Saturday, he and his staff outdid us.

Going forward, just take a deep breath. It's one loss. We're still right in the hunt. The media will use these next two weeks to talk about how the luck all came crashing down blah blah blah. I don't see it that way. By hook or by crook we were still in this game in the 4th quarter. Hell, it was tied midway into the 4th. But Auburn closed us out. Start praying for Auburn losses, and pray that we establish an offense in the bye week. There's a great chance this team wins 10 games. I think pre-season the majority said 10 wins would be a great season. I can't be terribly dissatisfied.

Comment 117 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from And The Valley Shook

Link Gumbo 12/27/12

Jan 2012 by PodKATT - 5 comments

Link Gumbo 1/16/11

Jan 2012 by PodKATT - 23 comments

The Sky is Falling Upward

Jan 2012 by Paul Crewe - 97 comments

Alabama A Lot, LSU Nothing

Jan 2012 by Poseur - 172 comments

Comments

Display:

First thing I did when I turned on the computer was check to see if firegarycrowton.com was taken

It’s not. WTF, LSU fans?

As for the tackling issues, I too was appalled at how poorly the D appeared to play. But I was riding home last night listening to WWL and Deke had to cut off like the third caller in a row for their nasty attitudes. He got all fired up and said something like “All I’ve heard tonight is how bad LSU is and how horribly we played. Did you ever think that maybe this is a top 5 team we’re playing and they just might have some decent players on their side the ball too?” Maybe we need to accept that Cam Newton isn’t as easily tackleable as Emmanuel Moody or Chris Relf.

Moreover, all the negativity leaves a sick taste in my mouth because it makes us look like poor losers. Our fans refuse to give any credit to the other team, it’s all about what we didn’t do and how poorly we played. Would it kill us to admit Auburn has a damn fine offensive line and a DT who is as talented and unblockable as Nevis?

One more comment, then I’ll hang up and listen. The one area where it was all our fault is the WR play. The dropped passes? unreal. But add to that, on the final 4th down, coming out of a timeout, Shepard not only didn’t know what the play was, he didn’t know he was supposed to be on the field. This is completely unexcusable and entirely the coaches’ fault. I’m convinced this is why Lee has to try to scramble, because Shepard wasn’t in his route (and, I’ll add, Toliver didn’t even try to block once Lee started to run, which is also inexcusable).

Don't Panic.

by 4.0 Point Stance on Oct 24, 2010 8:27 AM CDT reply actions  

I thought that that was TT who ran out late...

eh doesn’t matter, it was a WUDAFXUP anyway….

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hope you didn't feel that way...

About what I wrote above. I give Auburn all due credit. They were clearly the better team Saturday.

However, we also played poorly.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

No, doesn't apply to you

Auburn was clearly the better team, but they only won by seven. To listen to Danielson, not to mention the post game callers, you’d think they beat us 42-3.

Don't Panic.

by 4.0 Point Stance on Oct 24, 2010 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Cam Newton is a fabulous player.

But I nearly vomited with how much they talked about him.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Can't fault Danielson

I felt the same thing watching it

You may outfit the Trolley.

by Man Mountain on Oct 24, 2010 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

i can fault danielson

he is a bloviating moron who makes any game experience less enjoyable. with all the modern interactive technology, and multiple channels, i really wish there was a way you could watch the game and select the announcer you want to hear, or none at all.

by in the 9th on Oct 24, 2010 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

I lost it

when they started talking about Newton’s smile. He is an outstanding football player, but, really, his smile? C’mon, now.

by haveagreatday on Oct 25, 2010 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree strongly

Danielson is one of the best color men in the game, and Danielson and Verne together are about as good as it gets. Danielson really understands the passing game and the offense in general, they don’t talk down to viewers or fall back into “this guy that guy” blather like so many do.

They do, however, have one fault- they fall in love with players. They fell in love with Hester, they fell in love with Tebow, now they’re falling in love with Newton. On one hand, it’s nice to hear announcers who obviously enjoy the hell out of SEC football, just like I do. But sometimes they get carried away.

Don't Panic.

by 4.0 Point Stance on Oct 25, 2010 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

you've changed my mind.

his insight to the resemblence between cam newton & magic johnson was groundbreaking. the thought never occured to me, until that moment, that cam newton could be the bastard love child of magic johnson. it all makes sense now.

by in the 9th on Oct 25, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

nope

Danielson is good at explaining what happened in the play – and Verne has some good 1 liners – but it doesn’t make up for their continual love affairs with a handful of players and coaches. It’s like nails on a chalkboard.

by GeauxTiger on Oct 25, 2010 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Upon Further Review...

4th and 6 with 3:27 left on the clock and 3 time outs. Time Out… OK, I can live with that. We’re going for it. I can live with that too. Then what? Let’s run a play with 10 men on the field. Wait here comes the 11th. Hold on it looks like one is running off, no he’s just lost as to where to line up and what to do. Maybe we’re trying to pull the old Tennessee play on them and catch them with 13 on the field. It’s Auburn we’re playing, not Tennessee. Now we actually have to run a play with no one having the first clue as to what’s going on. Well we’ve won using this strategy in the past but not yesterday. Les’ luck ran out this time.

by Tiger6367 on Oct 24, 2010 8:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Well that sucked...

It’s a funny thing when you get beat like that…I’m not even really that mad.

We can pooh pooh our QB’s all day, but if we had Joe Montana playing behind our O-line on Saturday, we’d have still lost. GC’s offensive game plan worked in spurts, but because 1) we were playing from behind all day, 2) our WRs dropped catchable balls, and 3) our offensive line stayed on the bus, we weren’t able to sustain drives. Lee and JJ didn’t go out and win the game, but if we are expecting them to, we’re going to be disappointed.

On defense, wow. I have no idea what our gameplan was. We just got our asses beat. When we were in position to make a tackle we had an Auburn blocker on us that we couldn’t shed. When we shed a block, we were out of position. When we were in position without a blocker on us, we missed the tackle. Cam Newton is a great player, and I’m not trying to take anything away from him, but Auburn’s offensive line probably just turned in one of the best performances for an offensive line in the last 10 years of college football.

Bottom line, every team has weaknesses. We don’t have the coaches or personnel to exploit Auburn’s weaknesses, but they have the coaches and personnel to exploit our’s. They beat us. If we played 10 times we might win 2. All we can do now is try to win out and go to a BCS bowl. We’re done for Atlanta.

"I know the quarterback has a strong arm, but...I mean the ball's not gonna outrun ME" --PP7

by LSU Jonno on Oct 24, 2010 8:49 AM CDT reply actions  

I don't think we're done..

as far as Atlanta goes, but it don’t look pretty.

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly...hang this one on the Offensive Line

We couldn’t sustain drives given the negative plays they kept giving up. Result. A defense that always on the field.

by TigerPaw on Oct 24, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

We aren't done...

There’s so much football left to be played.

I don’t think we have a great shot, but we aren’t done.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Auburn has to lose two games out of

Ole MIss, UGA, and Bama.

I don’t see that happening. UGA is getting better, and Bama is good, and AU may have a let down AT Ole Miss next week. But they aren’t losing two.

And we probably aren’t done losing yet either.

"I know the quarterback has a strong arm, but...I mean the ball's not gonna outrun ME" --PP7

by LSU Jonno on Oct 24, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

If the offense doesn't magically fix itself in a hurry

I feel pretty sure we’re not done losing. I’m not bad-mouthing and I’m not mad at the team, I’m just stating what I think.

Most around here are sane, rational people, and I don’t think I got any arguments when I posted in the past that even though our defense was national title caliber, they couldn’t win all our games for us as Auburn, Alabama, and Arkansas are all likely to score on us.

We got our butts handed to us, way more than the score indicates, but the first six games have shown, and the next 4 will continue to show, that our defense is top notch. One bad day does not a terrible unit make, especially when you’re facing a freak of nature like Cam Newton. But the remaining SEC games are all losable if the offense can’t sustain some drives. I don’t even think we need them to score many more points, but they MUST be able to stay on the field, and keep other offenses on the bench. Part of the reason Auburns stats against us are so gaudy is because they were on the field all day while because our offense failed to keep Newton and Co. on the sidelines.

I am not, nor have I ever been on the “fire Les Miles” bandwagon that starts after every loss or every victory that’s not “pretty enough.” But one thing I have to hold him responsible for is not having a QB for the last 2.5 years. It is inexcusable and unacceptable to me at this point, and I think that fault lies on his shoulders. Even with Crowton’s discombobulated playcalling and receivers who offer no help, a QB who could be counted on to be calm and make good decisions would go a long way right now.

But speaking of receivers, not only do the dropped balls have to be cleaned up, I notice we don’t block away from the ball well anymore. That’s why our bubble screens amount to little, while Auburn and Alabama running those plays amount to yards after the catch. If you watch Auburn or Bama, they are exceptional at blocking away from the ball, and that’s what makes the difference in awesome talent (us) and an awesome offense (not us). Bowe, Doucet, Lafell…..the guys since then appear to not be learning to do much away from the ball. Plenty to work on in the bye-week.

by MikeDeTiger on Oct 24, 2010 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

woah

dude, one week of bad WR blocking doesn’t lead to all of your conclusions. normally our wideouts block very well – even danielson admits that.

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its more than this week

I’ve seen it quite a bit. They aren’t nearly as good at it as past receivers we’ve had. Auburn is not the first I’ve seen of it this year.

by MikeDeTiger on Oct 24, 2010 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's kinda of duplicitous...

To just assume Auburn wins out.
And to also assume we will keep losing.

I mean, if Auburn is THAT good to where they will win out, you’d have to think LSU must be able to only lose one more at worst, since we played them into the 4th on the road and lost by a TD.

Or, if LSU is so bad they are going to keep losing, Auburn’s win wasn’t that impressive and thus losing is on the horizon for them.

Auburn is a very flawed team with a very special player. Not out of the question for them to lose 1, 2 or even 3 of those games. Just like it’s not out of the question for us to go undefeated or lose all three of them. Wayyyy too early to call it over.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I mean, if Auburn is THAT good to where they will win out, you’d have to think LSU must be able to only lose one more at worst, since we played them into the 4th on the road and lost by a TD.

"I know the quarterback has a strong arm, but...I mean the ball's not gonna outrun ME" --PP7

by LSU Jonno on Oct 24, 2010 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I meant to quote that.

Anyway, I don’t think anything you just said disagrees with anything I said.

I never said AU woudl win out. I just don’t seeing them losing 2 games to that schedule AND us not losing again. Our lack of QB productivity will cost us another game.

"I know the quarterback has a strong arm, but...I mean the ball's not gonna outrun ME" --PP7

by LSU Jonno on Oct 24, 2010 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Two things...

First, all of the comments from players to the friends of mine that actually went to the game were very positive. The players respect LSU, and know that LSU will be one of, if not the toughest game every year. Comments about LSU fans have been all very positive as well.
I think you guys are a very good team, and had that game been in Baton Rouge, you win.
For what it’s worth..
Please Beat BAMA!

Come and join me at http://trackemtigers.com

by KoolBell777 on Oct 24, 2010 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Spot on PC.

Their O-line took it to our D-line all game. Needed a huge effort from them, because Cam is a monster in the open field.

Offense failed miserably; JJ was THE bright spot on offense…….. Crowton & Stud should be left in the Greater Opelika County area.

Defense played decent — scheme was sound — in the first half, then….. Cam happened and the wheels fell off.

I like the guy, and I think he does a good job of getting our guys lined up, but he’s not a great linebacker. If you put a blocker on Kelvin, you’ll end his day. Tennessee, Florida and Auburn all blocked right at him, and Sheppard failed to be a playmaking force in any of those games.

You know there was guy on the TDRant (I know I know) who tried to argue me down that Sheppard was the more important player for our defense than either Peterson of Nevis? EPIC FAIL.

Blame to be had everywhere; point blank though, Auburn just kicked our ass, and Cam Newton has my Heisman vote sewed up.

Da Bears…. UGH…

/facepalm
//rant
///backtothedrawingboard

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 8:50 AM CDT reply actions  

lsu vs auburn game

I am not an lsu fan , but when you talk about the quarterback jefferson about how he sucks playing, hell did you not see the sorry ass lee playing also, all because all of the rednecks hate to see a black quarterback at lsu, hell, thats right, tell your sorry coach to get some balls and play one quarterback, what is it with you people, its a dam game that you hate to see blacks play anyway at any level, pro, high school, or college.

by ronone10 on Oct 24, 2010 8:53 AM CDT reply actions  

Woah woah woah...

I think you have the wrong website man. No bigots in here.

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

thats...not the issue

at all.

"The second Patrick Peterson puts on an NFL uniform, Darrelle Revis becomes the 2nd best corner in the league."-Herm Edwards

by WatsonTiger on Oct 24, 2010 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Rohan Davey,

Jamarcus Russell, Marcus Randall, Herb Tyler to mention just the last 10 years or so. And the fanbase just about ran Josh Booty out of town to get Rohan on the field.

Go play with you X-Box again… wherever you put it.

And no… you’re not an LSU fan. And we’re glad.

by pttigris on Oct 24, 2010 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've always suspected there was some racism

when some fans called for Matt Flynn over JaMarcus. And I’m sure there will always be SOME racist fans that hate to see a black qb, but race is 95% NOT the issue here, that’s for sure.

In the history of college football, no player, no coach, no guru, compares with [Les] Miles’s masterful incorporation of applied chaos theory and time relativity into strategic game planning. Simply put, the man is on another level. A level many don’t or can’t understand. Genius.

by Gregatron on Oct 24, 2010 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Alright y'all..

Me, Watson, and pttigris have addressed this. I hope this doesn’t derail the thread any further.

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

since your not a fan

Then you weren’t around two years ago when Lee was playing. This year Jefferson has been awful. Their maybe some racist LSU Fans but not this one. We just want the player who is playing best to be on the field. So you should just go F yourself for your bullshit. BTW I’m black douche

I Kneel Before Zod!!

by jharrison2090 on Oct 24, 2010 9:34 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

What's funny about this

Is how everyone was calling for a true freshman JJ to start over Lee in 2008 half way into the season. Not to mention the calls for RS to start THIS year.

Do some research broski.

"I know the quarterback has a strong arm, but...I mean the ball's not gonna outrun ME" --PP7

by LSU Jonno on Oct 24, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well the fire Miles crowd...

is out in force and in full bloom today. Why do they persist? He’s not going anywhere and won’t till about 2014 or so. It’s such a useless meme.

Now Crowton needs to be fired at the end of the season. Stud too. It’s been three years of this dysfunctional BS and it’s past time. The excuses are gone and there is no way our talent is close to the 100 mark in the country. Goodbye Gary, nice knowin’ ya. And if the rumor about GC being here because LSU did not want to pay his buyout then I would not want Alleva hiring a new coach anyway. That would make him Joe Dean II.

About the game we were basically beaten by two players. We could not handle Newton on D and Fairley on O. Period. It wasn’t scheme, we had guys in position all day on D that did not make plays, took horrid angles, and could not get off blocks. Our safety play was horrid in run support. Pass D was good. On offense we did not often put our players in position to make plays and when we did they usually didn’t make them. The WR’s and TE can’t catch. This has been a continual problem for years. The whole O staff minus Wilson could go after the season and be replaced. No loss there.

We won’t see the likes of Newton again. Not even Ingram will give us that kind of problem. The guys that could catch him couldn’t take him down and the ones that could take him down couldn’t catch him. His mismatch created all of the space for their other players. Fairley was a different matter. We made no adjustments to handle him and even ran the ball straight at him on the last series. Sometimes you have to wonder where our O staffs heads are?

But we’re 7-1 and likely 10-2 or 9-3. It takes at least an offseason for Les to figure out how to fix something so changes will be coming in the offseason. Of course something else may well get broken too.

And give the Robinson guy a raise. Preferably from the money Alleva saved from not buying our Crowton.

by pttigris on Oct 24, 2010 9:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Robinson?

I’ll probably be like OH YEAH when you say it, but please indulge me.

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Joe Robinson

Sp teams coord

by amiznit on Oct 24, 2010 9:52 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

OH YEAH

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

I remember fans last year...

Saying JoeRob was a pointless coach. Did nothing for our team. Doesn’t recruit. Worthlessly taking up a spot.

Our fans are stupid, usually.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

I should have put a caveat...

The vocal majority on TD are stupid.

Every loss is Miles fault.
Every win Miles is lucky.
Every coach sucks.
We’re headed on a downturn, even though we nearly won 10 last year, and will almost certainly win 10 this year.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

i woudl say

that about half of LSU fans deserve curley hallman. they are that bad – for all the reasons Paul said.

The other half of us – well, some years we are saints just for putting up with the bad half of fans

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

The people are great...

I didn’t mean anyone here was stupid.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ha..

our special teams have been great since his arrival.

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

I really wish I knew

Why the Humanoids go from zero to “fire the coach” so quickly. Its like there’s no other way to express dissatisfaction.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Oct 24, 2010 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

before we get too carried away firing coaches...

I think we should keep Ron Cooper, as really, I don’t have any problem with how the running backs are playing at this point… Maybe that’s just me, but an opinion none the less… And really, as much as we love to bash GC, it doesn’t seem like it’s in the game plan anymore (with the exception of our last drive against Auburn…) I think he’s done what most people wanted to and stopped being quite so fancy. I just don’t see our players developing, and it seems that would fall on the position coaches… But I like our RB’s, so Ron Cooper gets my vote to stay. I think Billy Gonzales should definitely be taking some heat for his WR’s not catching, Stud’s O-line is much improved over last year, despite so many changes, even though continuity is oh-so-valuable in the line. I think we’d do well to have a dedicated QB coach, more so than a “passing game coordinator”… Thoughts?

by GTalmage on Oct 25, 2010 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thoughts?

Ummm, Ron Cooper is Defensive Backs coach, not Running Backs. Frank Wilson is the RB coach. But I agree we need a dedicated QB coach.

LSU - "...the defense you want to be and your girl wants to be with."

by The Bengal on Oct 25, 2010 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

you are absolutely correct

as you already know… I just had a “trying to think of position coaches who are earning their keep” brainfart and now feel more idiotic than an Ole’ Miss fan. But I would still say that I don’t have a real issue with Frank Wilson, and wouldn’t want to see us part with him.

by GTalmage on Oct 25, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

The offensive coordinator is an extension of the head coach

They go together. Most fans like to blame the offensive coordinator and ask for his head, because they love the head coach and don’t want to say anything negative about him. Take for instance Mack Brown. Longhorn fans are rioting and asking for Greg Davis’ (OC) head on a stick. They are not asking for Brown’s (well, the rational ones) because they love Brown and don’t want to criticize him. He and Greg Davis are joined at the hip and that is who they are/

Asking for Crowton’s head is pointless. He and Les Miles go together. Unless he get’s a guy like Malzahan or the OC from Oklahoma State who is given complete control and radically changes the scheme things won’t change. LSU’s offense will be this.

Since Miles got there LSU has been inconsistent on offense. Even when they had two really good QBs (good in college at least) they were inconsistent. See the ’06 team. That was a really talented team should have played for a national championship, but imploded offensively against Florida and Auburn.

There was a firefight!!!!

by ThePhenomenon on Oct 24, 2010 9:38 AM CDT reply actions  

Inconsistent...

Is different than terrible.

We’re terrible now. I remember being frustrated in a couple games that Jimbo was predictable blah blah. But does anyone ever remember the offense being consistently unorganized? Consistently confused? Players not knowing when to go in… after a timeout… in a HUGE game situation. Did this EVER happen with Jimbo?

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I always thought Jimbo was a good OC

and it sucked to lose him.

In the history of college football, no player, no coach, no guru, compares with [Les] Miles’s masterful incorporation of applied chaos theory and time relativity into strategic game planning. Simply put, the man is on another level. A level many don’t or can’t understand. Genius.

by Gregatron on Oct 24, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

disagree

you guys aren’t remembering how bad Jimbo was. the team wasn’t confused, but it also wasn’t very good on offense for a number of years. Some games we literally did NOTHING but run up the middle and run bubble screens. And under saban and jimbo the WR didn’t always block well on the bubbles. We had a number of SEC games against teams like auburn where the final score was 7-3 against us — where the 3 was really too many points given how bad our offense was

I can’t stand Crowton – but don’t bring us back to Jimbo.

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

running up the middle and bubble screens...

probably equals a W yesterday.

Jimbo also one of the best QB coaches in the country.

Now we have bad O and no QB coach.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

jimbo may have been a great QB coach

i have no way to judge that at all.

and i’m not suggesting I wouldn’t trade Jimbo straight up for Crowton – i would in a heartbeat. I just remember a lot of bad offenses with Jimbo and a lot of really talented teams that couldn’t score in big games. Jimbo’s/Saban’s teams frequently scored lots of points on bad teams and not so many on good teams.

But he would obviously be a huge improvement on Crowton. At this point, a cabal made up of this blog would be a huge improvement on Crowton

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seems like Malzahn and Newton...

helped AU a bit. If Miles gets an OC that he can mesh with I doubt he’ll get that involved. We never had an offense this impotent with Jimbo. We don’t need Bill Walsh, just somebody competent and organized – especially organized. Tht’s not Les’ strength, and evidently not Crowton’s either.

by pttigris on Oct 24, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is 2+ years of offensive futility..

Mack and Greg brought UT to the NT LAST SEASON.

Dan Holgorsen

Do you believe he would make the lateral move to a higher profile school?

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

HHHMMM..

thought he held the designation by himself. He has cut his teeth with Texas Tech and Houston though. Not designating him can’t miss, but he is an interesting prospect.

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

something to ponder...

well, lets see; We got hammered with their running game, gave up over 500 yards of total offense, our WR’s couldnt catch their own ass with 2 hands, our Qbs had no time to throw, and Superman was under center for the other team.
 
 Yet, the game was tied with 5:05 remaining. One busted play later and we are down, with still a chance to tie/win the game. I watched the game with several friends and 3 Auburn fans (realtives, couldnt be helped), and the Auburn group were extremely nervous when we got the ball back. All I hear is how we got mauled, yet we lost the game by one late busted TD run.

This is just another weird piece of the 2010 season puzzle…

btw, my personal opinion, Auburn will lose to ’Bama.

by jonanthans on Oct 24, 2010 10:08 AM CDT reply actions  

I think they will too...

And don’t sleep on the Ole Miss letdown game next week…

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

agree with both

AU is two games up essentially, but we still have a real chance. Auburn could easily havea letdown game – and quite frankly – not that i’m rooting for anyone to get hurt -but if Cam has to miss a game or two they are likely screwed.

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Anatomy of a loss

1) Offense: I’m a strong advocate of going with the hot hand and Jefferson did have a good performance yesterday. Not all of Lee’s problems were on Lee. Both Lee and Jefferson had problems, but you can also put a good bit of that on the receivers. The offensive line was also mauled, which didn’t make things any easier. Despite the offensive performance Auburn had yesterday, LSU was still in a position to win it. The offensive unit as a whole could not capitalize. Much of this is an issue with fundamentals because the talent is there. The offense gets a C-.

2) Defense: Yes. There is that guy named Cam Newton that made LSU’s defense look like a high school team. There’s also the more obvious elephant in the room that has been a problem: poor tackling. This is a fundamental part of defense and as good as Cam Newton is, any offense looks better when a defense doesn’t tackle well. Perhaps the only consolation I can take here is that many programs have the same problem with fundamentals. Unfortunately, it’s not much of a consolation considering that fundamental play issues also are part of the offense. I’ll give the defense a C-.

3) Coaching: Problems with fundamentals are shared by players and coaches alike. I’m not such a huge fan of the QB system and I described myself as being cautiously optimistic about the team following the win against Florida. I’m going to give the coaching a B- for this game.

4) Special Teams: Good special team play kept LSU in the game. Auburn had to often start their drives from deep within their own territory. Special teams gets an A in this game. They did their part.

5) Overall: LSU was shredded on defense and the offense really could not get things going. The first drive being killed by the interception was exceptionally costly because the following Auburn possession resulted in a TD. Turnovers have been a problem all season and one finally came back to bite LSU. The defense also failed to step up on that possession to steal momentum away from Auburn. That event in the first quarter, in my opinion, set the tempo of the game. LSU was playing catch up for the entire game after that despite tying the game a couple of times. Auburn was the better team, but LSU shot themselves in the foot with the turnover, dropped passes on offense, and poor tackling on defense. It was a 7 point loss, so the team gets a C+ as the overall grade.

RIP Ronnie James Dio (July 10, 1942 - May 16, 2010).
Free BLou

by Ace Venom on Oct 24, 2010 10:23 AM CDT reply actions  

I loved the way this team fought. My wife thought LSU was playing horrible everytime AU got a first down, but realistically having watched Cam play all year I knew how tough it was going to be, and even though he piled on yards we were still in the game at the end with a chance to tie.
1)Special teams as a whole were magnificent. I’ve never seen that many punts inside the 10 like that.
2)Defense missed a lot of tackles, though I thought the scheme was sound. I kind of saw it coming with some of the success both MSU and UF had with similiar looks in spurts. I think Montgomery would have helped ALOT in this game; in addition, Hatcher’s inability to tackle anybody was very disappointing. I thought Loston stepped in nicely 2nd half.
3)Offensively I thought our OL was lacking in pass blocking, but they were blowing AU backwards early on. It seems we abandonned Ridley in the 2nd half for some reason. I will say if you’re an OLineman and you’re zone blocking you CANT block Fairley with your arm while looking to someone else, I believe you have to commit to blocking HIM. TT just needs to really concentrate on his catches. He’s a senior he should expect more from himself and he probably does.

Lastly, AU just found a way to win, which is a sign of a good football team. I think if that game is played in BR then it is a different result. I’m proud that our guys played hard and gave maximum effort, and if your team does THAT then losses like this are just overall easier to accept. GEAUX TIGERS beat ’BAMA!

by Howard Green on Oct 24, 2010 11:15 AM CDT reply actions  

Cam is a special player. And no team from here on has a guy like that on our schedule. They dominated us on both sides with line play and it was 17-17 late. We can beat every team on our schedule starting with Bama.

We played hard/with effort all around, but we did not tackle or block (the blocking problem was more in the second half with Farley I think) well. Spot on about QB’s and how they were used. JJ gives us a threat at running and has all year, but he is not a pocket passer—he just is not. JLee is not a threat to run at any time, so no need to have him in zone read type of plays. Where was the ground and pound with Ridley he have seen all year (12 carries) this helps both QB’s. Tough loss, but with the bye week, the team can use this and rally for Bama in two weeks. Heal up and come out for a real war on Nov. 6. Bama (team and a lot of fans) think this one is in the bag and probably have felt this way all year. Geaux Tigers! Beat Bama!

"(actor James Urbaniak) Robert Crumb: You turned yourself into a comic hero?
(actor Paul Giamti) Harvey Pekar: Sorta, yeah. But no idealized s***. No phony bs. The real thing, y'know? Ordinary life is pretty complex stuff.

(Real) Havey Pekar: I felt more alone that week than any. Sometimes I'd feel a body lying next to me like an amputee feels a phantom limb. All I did was think about Jennie Gerhardt and Alice Quinn and all the decades of people I had known. The more I thought, the more I felt like crying. Life seemed so sweet and so sad, and so hard to let go of in the end. But hey, man, every day is a brand new deal, right? Just keep on working and something's bound to turn up."

From the movie "American Splendor"

by mjtig on Oct 24, 2010 11:34 AM CDT reply actions  

Give Auburn all the credit in the world

They deserve it.

That said, I absolutely hated Chavis’ ‘game plan’, which was nothing more than to stay in his base defense, blitzing here & there with a shell zone behind it. Chavis is ‘my guy’ – I lobbied for him and I’ll stand behind him. That said, he’s not immune to mistakes and this was one of them.

First off, by sticking to our base, Auburn out manned us – as many or more blockers playside as we had defenders. This happened all night long – on sweeps, draws, option reads, etc.

Secondly, we tried to play the option conventionally, squeezing down by the end and sending LBs to the outside. That was bad – Auburn started blocking the DE or LB, reading other players, and killing us. That lead to our guys trying to ‘decide’ who to take – trying to read the ball and follow it, which is exactly what an option offense wants you to do.

Thirdly, not aggressive enough. Breaking down to make a tackle was the wrong thing to do, as when our defenders tried to break down, Cam was already by them. Our LBs were not flowing downhill, sitting back flat footed instead. When we did blitz, we played a ‘safe’ soft shell zone – why?! We have absolutely wonderful corners and Cam has not shown pinpoint passing – man up and send more – don’t leave open receivers underneath for easy pitch & catch sessions! On top of that, if they are going to double / triple / hold Nevis all night, you HAVE to send the bodies and take advantage of it.

All summed up, it was simply a horrible approach defensively and we paid the price.

Offensively…. I don’t want to talk about that…. The only thing I will say is that our O-line is still not where it needs to be; not for an average team, much less a title contender. They got their asses whooped.

by Xanathol on Oct 24, 2010 12:19 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree X

I think our gameplan on D should have been more stunts, slants and blitzes and make Cam beat us with his arm. It would have put our Corners one on one but we got the cirners to do it. I think not being aggressive on D led to all the missed tackles. I could be wrong, Chavis is definately smarter than me.

by cbkao on Oct 24, 2010 2:46 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Newton has killed the blitz previously..

So that may be cause for some of the hesitation.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most likely it was

Chavis is a great DC so I don’t really second guess him. But haven’t we been an aggressive D all year and changed that philosophy for this game? Seriously, aren’t we usually more aggressive? I don’t re-watch the games and break em down like you do Paul so I really don’t know. But it seems like we should have stuck to what we do best if that’s the case.

by cbkao on Oct 24, 2010 3:31 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

He (Chavis)..

probably didn’t expect to get whipped at the LOS all day, to be fair.

DERPCON Alert Level: 1

by Mikeno on Oct 24, 2010 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Very true

by cbkao on Oct 24, 2010 7:01 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Have to disagree

Blitz would open up the very holes that killed us. Let’s face it, a DT or DE was not going to bring him down repeatedly. He would have another 100 rushing I think the scheme was dead on. But as K Shep said, “people tried to do too much instead of playing their assignments.”
In the end The hype got to them. They tried to over perform as the best D in the country. Came close to the Bending-D perfection. Can you imagine if we had a way to get the ball downfield, loosen up the LB and Safeties! We score 31 without even pushing it.

by ZimmZimmZalaBimm on Oct 24, 2010 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

i guess i thought the strategy would have been

to leave the corners one on one and put everyone else in the box – but with no outside blitzes. Newton wanted to go straight up field -so put 8 guys lined up in his way?

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

i'm honestly not sure

it’s hard to tell sometimes watching hte first time through…

we certainly didn’t tackle well enough for this to work

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

This team was never going to go undefeated

auburn was the better team for sure so a W for the bengal tigers would have been the burglary of the season. if the score weren’t on the screen, any viewer would have assumed we were getting dominated on the scoreboard because, well, we were getting dominated on the field. They will likely be #1 in the BCS when the poll comes out tonight. All in all, losing to one of the best teams in the country is not a reason to rend your tunic. And yet, we were absolutely in the game for 3 and 3/4s quarters despite the aforementioned manhandling, our inconsistency on offense and looking like hot garbage trying to arm tackle the love child of a rhino-cheetah-sequoia threesome. Hell, we might have screwed around and won it if it weren’t for some next level ignorance after that TO. It’s one loss. Should I go ahead and make my reservations for Dallas or is that too presumptuous when our team can’t EVEN GET THE RIGHT PERSONNEL ON THE FIELD 8 GAMES INTO THE SEASON IN A GAME DEFINING DRIVE AGAINST A HUGE RIVAL? /facepalm+gnashing of teeth+weeping of crocodile tears

by haveagreatday on Oct 24, 2010 1:18 PM CDT reply actions  

Did the D really play that badly?

It sounds crazy to type, but they gave up 24 to the best player in NCAA. I predicted we win holding them to 21. They kept us in the game. Screw the stats, with time left we were close enough to win. The O is simply not capable. Period. We really are the 100th worst O in the game. I don’t know the answer. I blamed JJ…and he is bad. But fact is Miles was right, Lee is not great. I’d prefer one QB that can throw, but if the line can’t give time Lee is useless.

It is 2009 all over again, but this year I can’t blame RP. Crow must go.

by ZimmZimmZalaBimm on Oct 24, 2010 1:55 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm with you...

The D didn’t play well. But they played well enough.

Like I said above, I feel like the insistence of playing Jarrett Lee and his porous play really cost us this game…

Not that Auburn didn’t deserve it.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd say the OL more than Lee

neither QB did much, but the OL apparently stayed in Baton Rouge for this one.

Our DL got mugged pretty good by Auburn’s OL, but other than bad tackling, I also don’t think we played all that badly. The stats (and maybe event the score) wouldn’t have gotten as high as they did if our offense just stayed on the field a little more. As you and Billy wrote last week, the best way to handle their offense is to keep them on the sidelines.

I really feel like offense cost us this game, not defense.

I think we’re going to see over the rest of the year and for as long as Newton remains in college, that he is just a special player. I think we have a great D, the season up til now has shown it, the rest of the season will continue to show it.

by MikeDeTiger on Oct 24, 2010 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, line was definitely the issue...

I should probably clarify.

Lee playing when it became apparent our line wasn’t handling business thus we needed mobility back there make makes little to no sense. Thus every series, Lee comes out, gets little time to throw and plays miserably (somewhat not his fault). Aggravating.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

i don't know

the oline played terribly, but Lee only played for what – 3 or 4 drives? It’s not like JJ had a lot of success. And even with the bad Oline, if the WR had caught a couple of Lee’s passes he might have had a lot more success.

I don’t think we would have been that likely to score ten more points if JJ had been in for 2 more drives and tried to run himself. I could be wrong though…

i go back to our lack of Ridley. I just don’t understand it. He’s our most consistently productive offense player and he hardly got the ball

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

The offense in the 2nd half...

was a disaster in every way.

Lack of Ridley and when we did use him, trying to get him on the edges, which doesn’t suit his strengths.
Tried too many pocket passes.
We have to play our game. N/S running. Rollouts and zone/reads with JJ. Screens and quick hitters with Lee.

Those are the things we are good at when we are good.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

i totally agree

we are good at 3 things. N/S running. JJ rollouts and zone reads and Lee’s quick screens. Did we do any of htat in the 2nd half?

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

that's a great point

I guess giving up 400 yards on the ground and a mere 24 points is a bend but don’t break wet dream?
I am really not all that upset with the D other than the obvious tackling issue. They kept it close which is all you can ask of them, particularly when they are getting no TOP help from the O. I think I’m mostly frustrated b/c we were in it until the end but that a totally avoidable lapse getting the right guys on the field cost us dearly. Now, maybe we convert, maybe we don’t, but I’m fine with going out swinging. I am not fine with that chinese fire drill BS at an absolutely crucial point in the game.

by haveagreatday on Oct 24, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

disagree

offense sucked at the end

but so did the D. That 70 yard touchdown they gave up was garbage.

And although Newton was great – it wasn’t like he was the only AU player we couldn’t tackle. They had 4 guys with 80 plus yards. That is really bad and cost us the win.

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am speaking specifically

about the continuing problems with end of the game organization.

by haveagreatday on Oct 24, 2010 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I said this in another post

but it’s my delusionally optimistic opinion that this is a reflection of just how truly bad ass our punt coverage was against Auburn, that the HAD to put up those gaudy numbers on offense if they were going to score 24 points. Just think about it… If we put them inside their own 10 so many times, and they scored 3 touch downs and a field goal, they’d have to go 90-95 yards 3 times and at least 60-ish for a relatively easily makeable field goal… so that’s 330 yards of offense right there…. if they don’t even punt. I think what troubled me was the loooooooooooooooooooooong (drawn out for alliteration and emphasis) plays, which I think relected a combination of some sick athletes on the part of Auburn (you can’t not give Cameron Newton and Onterio McCalebb credit… you can possibly not give their punter credit though…) and some poor tackling on the part of our D. There is still a lot of positive to take away from this game though…

by GTalmage on Oct 25, 2010 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think this statement nails it
I’m fine with going out swinging

I think that’s where the real frustration has been all year. And I think that by “going out swinging” one would have to mean giving it to the guys who make plays and letting them make the plays they are BEST at. That means, as it’s been said, not running Ridley to the outside, not keeping JJ in the pocket, not trying to run RS up the middle, and most frustratingly, getting the right people on the field for what would become our LAST PLAY on offense. Of course you can’t win the game with JL scrambling, just like you couldn’t win the game with Helton playing LB… There is so much specialization amongst positions these days in football, let the players do what they are trained to do!

by GTalmage on Oct 25, 2010 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

and this in no way

implies that we would have won. Auburn is not an OK team they are a VERY GOOD team, and might have risen to stop us anyway. Just want to make sure that Auburn does get the credit they deserve for playing a great game.

by GTalmage on Oct 25, 2010 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

agreed.

i think pinning this on the defense is somewhat shortsighted. had the offense sustained any kind of rhythm, had any sort of consistency in attack, then maybe LSU sneaks out with a win. its easy to look at 500 yards given up and say “thats the reason,” but i dont think that is entirely accurate.

by in the 9th on Oct 24, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I respectfully disagree

The d didn’t play up to their standards so yes they didn’t play well. Special teams is the reason we didn’t give up more points. Auburn was forced to continually drive 90 yards to score. But with that said I’m still proud of our team, they played hard and just simply got beat by the better team. There is nothing wrong with that.

by cbkao on Oct 24, 2010 2:58 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I don't think anyone...

is saying they played well.

But I don’t think they are necessarily why we lost either.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're right

The offense’s inability was also a big part of y we lost. I was just saying we (or maybe just me) have come to expect more of our d. But Cam’s a freak and alot of d’s problems were just that Cam’s a freak. I’ve never seen someone that big and quick. He’s like a Ferrari in a Tanks body.

by cbkao on Oct 24, 2010 3:23 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Have to disagree

At what point in the game after the first series did you feel our defense could stop them? I hoped, but I did not think it was possible. Almost 7 yards per play on 1st down had a heck of a lot to do with that.

by Xanathol on Oct 24, 2010 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well..

After Newton’s TD score in the 3rd, it looked like this:

5 plays, 36 yards
3 plays, 4 yards
8 plays, 34 yards
8 plays, 40 yards

So sans 2 huge plays (Newton and McCaleb’s runs)… we did stop them in the 2nd half…

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

but that's the problem

we gave up 2 HUGE plays where about half the defense whiffed.

we can’t take those plays out and say – other than that, we did ok. Auburn’s whole offense is predicated on eventually getting those big plays – and they did

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

I’m not saying magically take them out, but X’s point was “we never stopped them.” And we did. Pretty well actually.

I credit big plays to the defense being tired, particularly the McCalebb TD. Also, BT15 had the angle and was right there for the tackle on that play and over ran it. He makes the tackle, it’s a 5 yard gain. It happens, I suppose.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

it has happened twice now with taylor

same exact angle last year on the Julio Jones TD

by Draco on Oct 24, 2010 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

any thoughts on the new rankings?

LSU 13 in the coaches. can’t say i’m surprised, but i’m am a little put off that they dropped us below nebraska, who lost by double digits to a not very good texas team. Not that it matters a whole lot

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 3:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Bullshit...

I have major issues with the polls.

The blatant homerism for teams is obnoxious. Bama dropped about 4 or 5 spots after losing on the road to a team in the bottom half of the 25.

LSU loses to a team ranked ahead of them, by fewer points, on the road… and drops nearly 10 spots.
OU loses to an 11th ranked team, on the road, and drop 10 spots.

Why does Bama get a pass for losing to a worse team?

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

hey - i didn't say i'm happy about it

i said i’m not surprised. it’s clearly not justified, and the continued awe inspired approach to saban is sickening, but it’s not surprising at this point.

by GeauxTiger on Oct 24, 2010 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh I wasn't dogging you...

Just the process in general.

There’s no logic to it.

Bama has looked better in winning, sure, but their loss is worse than most of the others with one loss (LSU, OU, Ohio State).

Shit, we’ll probably beat them by 3 TDs and be ranked behind them still.

by Paul Crewe on Oct 24, 2010 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think it's a reflection

of a deep-rooted belief that LSU just isn’t a top ten team. And, to be honest, in my heart of hearts I don’t think they are either. The talent and determination are there, but there’s too much confusion and disorganization at the moment.

You may outfit the Trolley.

by Man Mountain on Oct 24, 2010 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

This was an easier one to take.

We just got beat by a superior player, like every good team did by Texas when they had true game changer in 2005. In college, a truly superior athlete at QB is almost unbeatable.

by TigerTex on Oct 24, 2010 4:52 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Exactly

Tex I think you said it best!

by Howard Green on Oct 24, 2010 10:02 PM CDT reply actions  

problem is

 we are looking this Qb issue straight in the face again next season. Two headed monster at best, even if we bring in the Ga transfer..Watching the Green Bay/MInny game on Sunday night, I almost cried when Matt Flynn hit the field, knowing with that one player right there we could be in line for a NC this year…

by jonanthans on Oct 26, 2010 5:40 AM CDT reply actions  

In reference to your article.

A very interesting read. I actually agree with you on most of it with some things to add since last week’s game.

I read the other day where one of the Auburn guys said they had LSU’s game plan figured out by the second half and basically came after them which was obvious.
On Miles, since the 2007 season, he has not had the ability to win the big games that matter. They do ok on most of the teams they play, but when it gets down to the powerhouse teams in the conference, they fade. If it was one year or one game, I’d say perhaps it was the players where the team was lacking, but going on three years of the same, I’d have to say it’s the coaching. LSU has the talent on both sides of the ball, but predictable play calling by Miles and Crowton has really made it easier for other teams to figure out what they are playing.
 
On the quarterback situation, they are not playing the quarterbacks to their strengths and are trying to make them run plays they are not qualified to run. I am a firm beleiver that if LSU had a solid quarterback they would be number one and would be crushing teams this year including Auburn last weekend. The defense is tired. They have been carrying the load. I said before the Auburn game that the offense was going to have to step up because there would be a time when the defense would not be able to carry them. Had the offense been productive, LSU would have beat Auburn. The problem with our quarterback system is Crowton is still trying to run it as he would back when we had a qualified quarterback, but since these guys have not been able to get to that next level as of yet, I would say one or two things, either they are not quarterback material or the coaching on quarterbacks has been extremely poor. The other thing that alarms me is the offense cannot get balanced. Last year, more pressure was put on Jefferson because LSU had no running game for the most part which is the blame on the most part for not having a strong offensive line. This year that was corrected on the most part, now they have no passing game. In order to to be successful on either side of the ball, there has to be balance. If a team has a balanced offense, it keeps defenses off balance because they know the offense has the ability to run and pass. Likewise on defense, the defense has to have the ability to shut down the run and keep the pass game in check. On the most part LSU has done that on defense through most of the games this year.

They have a very tough game coming up against Alabama in a week. As the offense is limited due to the problems they are having at quarterback, I would suggest to use both quarterbacks to their strengths and make plays that are not predictable but playable for them to be able to achieve them. As Jefferson is a strong running and roll out or short option passes, use him in those circumstances, but balance it out to keep the defense on their toes. Likewise, with Lee being a pocket passer, drill them with a strong running game up the middle as it is going to be virtually impossible to run on the outside against Alabama and set up plays where he does pass that he is comfortable making. Trying to get these guys to do things are not capable of doing is what has hurt the offense. I’m not sure if their progress has been limited in their real abilities or in the fact that whoever is doing the quarterback coaching is not doing their job. I know that Matt Flynn was not the best quarterback in the league, but he had the ability to get things done when they needed to get done. The same went with Russell even though he didn’t do too well in the pros. I think anyone with common sense is you evaluate the talent that you have at every position and use that talent in ways plays to their strengths in order to win ballgames.

On defense, with them not playing against a quarterback at Cam’s potential(thank God….LOL) I would suggest strongly going back to what has worked for them all year. If the offense can put up points and the defense plays up to their potential as they have all year except in the second half against North Carolina and the Auburn game last week, LSU should be able to beat Alabama. Irregardless of what anyone says, Alabama is not the team they were last year. They are a very good team no doubt with one of the best coaches in the game, but they are beatable. LSU is still very much alive. They have another week to make the corrections. I would also suggest using Shepard more on the wildcat and put the ball in his hands more. He’s accustomed to playing the quarterback position so it would be nothing new to them. They have some of the best receivers in the country, but they can’t be factor if they don’t get the ball. If they will use the quarterbacks to their strengths, the receivers will become more involved in the game and will become more of a factor. LSU’s poor rankings on offense the last couple of years is beyond ridicalous with the talent they have. I totally hold both Miles and Crowton responsible for this. I’m not saying LSU should have been undefeated over the last two and a half years, but some of the losses and some of the close games such as with Tennessee this year and loss at Ole Miss last year is definitely a breakdown on the coaching end. It honestly seems to me that the coaching staff at LSU outside of Chavis and special teams coach has become very lax on the most part. Yes defense wins championships, but offense wins games. If you don’t have both, you’re in trouble already. LSU’s defense is very good, but even they have off days and can get beat around the field as Auburn showed last week and North Carolian showed in the second half of the first game. A good offense with no defense can’t win cause you have to be able to stop opponents, likewise, a good defense with no offense can’t win. You may stop teams 90% of the time, but there comes a time when the offense has to step up and do their part as well. All in all, if LSU can balance out and straighten out what has been going wrong, they should go the rest of the season without losing another game, but it is to be seen. Up to this point, I’m pretty disgusted as we are now at week 9 and through week 8, the offense has had very little life. As sad as it is, I don’t expect any difference in week ten or week 13. If the corrections haven’t been made at this point, I don’t look for them to be made at all. Let’s hope someone in charge will wake up and get some heat where it needs to be, on Miles and then on down the line. It will get to the point that the better players will not want to go to LSU and play if they are not confident that the program will be a winning program. Everyone loves to win and the better players will go to schools where not only can they make a difference, but they will see W’s and championships, not losses and boos even when you do win. To put it in a nutshell, the Auburn game was coming, it was only a matter of time. I’m surprised they only lost by 7. It very well could have been by 50 with the poor play on both sides of the ball and while I am saying this, what in the world happened to the offensive line? They were horrific. Those quarterbacks should not have been getting hit that many times irregardless of who was on defense. Yes they were whipped and soundly, but honestly, had LSU played up to their potential, the game would have been closer and better all of the way around. Auburn beat them before they ever played because everyone was so focused on Cam Newton and his abilities. Poor game plan all the way around on both sides of the ball. Very good article. Thanks for sharing.

by Scott Reppond on Oct 28, 2010 4:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about LSU Tigers. Best viewed in Wide mode

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Lm_deal_small
The Curious Case of Jordan Jefferson
Lsuavatar_small
The "Tipping Point" for Playoff
Small
A sad day in Tiger Nation
Steeler_small
Question About Michael Brockers
Imag0299_small
Morris Claiborne NFL Draft Profile Video
76224_20070106130217_small
KJ Malone commits to LSU at Spring Game
Grabboavatar_small
A Student's Perspective on Thursday's Open Practice
Tower_small
LSU Spring Game/ATVS Meet-&-Greet?
Small
Feheko Fanaika?
76224_20070106130217_small
John Diarse Commits

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

LSU Baseball

42-14

Conference

19-11

Streak

W1

SEC Baseball Standings

Last Update: May 19

# - SEC Tournament Seeding

Team Name = Eliminated from SEC Tournament


Managing Editor / Chief Lackey

Pb140006_small PodKATT

Editors

Gse_multipart30441_small Richard Pittman

Me_and_beer_small Poseur

Tower_small Billy Gomila

Paulcrewe_small Paul Crewe

Authors

Mike_snow_small actioncuse