Post Game Chatter: The Arkansas Game
Ouch. This one stings. For me, it stings worse than the Auburn loss. I guess only because the later you get into the season the closer you get to realizing how close you are to great post season opportunities, only to see them dashed away (though I'm not yet certain we're a lock to not make the BCS, though I think the likelihood is pretty small).
I spend most of my time being optimistic about the state of LSU football, the success of Coach Miles, our strong defensive coordinator and gobs of talent. But tonight is just one of those nights where you can't help but feel down... deflated. In truth, we had a successful season. We've improved every year over the past three years. Most penciled us in for at least three losses, and happily declared a 10-2 season would be a resounding success. Well, here we are. How does it feel?
I think in a few days, when I'm completely over the loss, I'll look back and genuinely say, "It was a good regular season." Unfortunately, the bitter taste of defeat is still fresh on my tongue. It's tough losing late. It's tough going from near BCS lock to likely Capitol One Bowl bound (which is the SEC nightmare bowl, to make matters worse). So it is... there's plenty of time to discuss outcomes later, let me get back to the task at hand.
I can't help but feel this was our worst showing of the year. Neither the offense, nor the defense played well. We missed a field goal. We turned the ball over on special teams (fluky as it was). It seemed apparent early on that the ball just wasn't going to bounce our way today. But really, when I look back on it, this game perfectly encapsulates our team from the year: Moments of greatness, surrendering big plays on defense (more on that later) and offensive ineptitude. I'm not big on "one call" or "one play" making a game, but it is weird to think back and realize that we were about 4 plays away from being undefeated (two big Auburn TD runs, two big Arkansas TD catches).
Defensively, what has happened? Honestly, I can't help but believe the defense just wore down after having to soldier through so many early season games shouldering the team. At least, that's what I want to hope is what happened, because if not, we have some serious defensive coordination issues. Realistically, injuries played heavily into the mix as well. We played some good offenses with experienced quarterbacks down the stretch, and those teams took advantage of our defensive weaknesses. But I do believe we wore down. Teams had little to no success running the ball on us early in the year, but as the season wore down you saw teams being more and more effective doing it.
I hate picking on a particular player, and overall the defensive unit did not play well as a whole, but I just can't go without acknowledging Karnell Hatcher's poor play. I've not been a fan of Hatcher all season. He's a one-dimensional safety that closes hard on the run and often goes for the killshot rather than making sound tackles. His game, from my perspective, is better suited at linebacker. Arkansas went at him today, and twice he was directly responsible for huge plays in the passing game. It's unfortunate to think that without those two plays, we probably win this game. I may even go as far as to say without the one at the end of the 1st half, we win the game, because that really shifted everything for the 2nd half.
Speaking of those huge plays, it's remarkable to look at this issue that has plagued our defense all season long. Here's a breakdown of big scoring plays we surrendered.
Big Passing TDs Surrendered
97 yards (UNC)
65 yards (OM)
85 yards (Arky)
80 yards (Arky)
39 yards (Arky)
Big Rushing TDs Surrendered
49 yards (Auburn)
70 yards (Auburn)
50 yards (OM)
Ouch. Keep in mind, this is only scoring plays. I imagine there's plenty of other examples of big plays we gave up throughout the year. Overall, I think Chavis made strides with the defense from year one to year two. The pass rush certainly improved. Losing Sam Montgomery likely altered this defense in ways we will never know. Not that Lavar Edwards hasn't played well, but Sam is just a special kind of talent and difference maker and having BOTH of those guys rotating is even more menacing. Losing Brandon Taylor just added to the devastation. I do have some lingering concerns about our defenses ability to perform against unconventional offenses (Auburn/Ole Miss) and in big time games (Arkansas). These were major criticisms of Chavis prior to his arrival at LSU and thus far I've seen nothing to alter that perception. However, Chavis is a great teacher of fundamentals, and I do think he's still good enough to win a championship with (though I'm a rueing that early season matchup with Oregon next season).
Offensively... what more can you say? We saw a little bit of both Jordan Jefferson/swag today. We saw the atrocious offensive line play that ravaged our chances last season. We saw the horrible game planning, clock managing and play calling that made us all despise Gary Crowton (who I seriously doubt coaches another game at LSU). Early season I declared that LSU found something to hang their hat on... a zone blocking, downhill running scheme. Well, we sorta did that? It never seemed like we stuck with that identity. Instead, we kept trying to be "multiple" whatever the hell "multiple" means. Our grab bag offense worked just well enough for most of the season, but today our inability to convert in the red zone, get the ball to our playmakers (I know Randle is hobbled, but one catch?) and stick to our strengths (Ridley had 17 carries... and ran it at a respectable 4.4 clip) are just microcosms of the painful struggles we have witnessed for the previous two seasons. About the only good thing we did on offense was hit 10 different receivers in meaningful game action. I can't remember the last time we had so many different targets.
The offense had ridiculous field position all day long. Zod AVERAGED 40.8 yards on kick returns. That's an incredibly high average for someone who didn't house one of them. Even Ron Brooks' single return he got out past the 30. Yet, we were unable to capitalize. JJ spent a lot of the night running for his life. The pass protection was dreadful. PJ Lonergan played his worst game in a long time. Two costly poor snaps and just general suckage up front. Oh yeah, losing Alex Hurst didn't help our line much either.
Overall, we've made positive strides the past two seasons. By all means, we should be better next year. But, I can't help but shake this nagging bug of "when will Miles lose less than two?" If anyone has a good way to assuage that doubt for me, I'd love to hear it. I also think there's a decent probability we may be looking for a new coach in January. I can't see Rich Rodriguez lasting at Michigan, and I know Miles would be near the top of the list, whether Michigan fans want it or not. So maybe that question will answer itself for me.
Don't read me wrong. I like Miles. I want Miles to be our coach. If he returns, I won't crow about how we're sure to lose X number of games because Miles is our coach. The people that believe that nonsense are foolish and like Les said probably don't think their wives are pretty or whatever the hell he said.
71 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Frustrating game to watch.
When Ware jumped on the muffed punt and it bounced out was the start followed by all the freakin’ clock/time stop problems—those two holding penalties back to back one after a big run by Ford on that one drive to name a few things. The bleepin’ long pass at the end of the half and only 6 points with all the momentum in the third and on and on. I hated the one particular play where JJ faked a handoff and then stood in the pocket with the pig pass rush crashing down on him it seemed every time.
We got away from our ground and pound usual with Ridely getting 17, but with all that, Arky played great beating us in the trenches, wearing our D down. The Tigers did play hard and did not quit, but Arky was the better team. I would love to see a change at OC, but I am proud of the team: 10-2, 6-2 in what is the best division in college football and we will only lose 13 seniors next year. Rest up, prepare well Tigers and win whatever bowl you get in. Geaux Tigers!
(Real) Havey Pekar: I felt more alone that week than any. Sometimes I'd feel a body lying next to me like an amputee feels a phantom limb. All I did was think about Jennie Gerhardt and Alice Quinn and all the decades of people I had known. The more I thought, the more I felt like crying. Life seemed so sweet and so sad, and so hard to let go of in the end. But hey, man, every day is a brand new deal, right? Just keep on working and something's bound to turn up."
From the movie "American Splendor"
I’d like to see Crowton gone BEFORE a bowl game! It’s time to loosen the reins on the talent we have on the team – actually, should have fired him mid-season and we might be undefeated now!! If he coaches in a bowl game, we’ll see more of the “happy to be in a close fight” mentality that has been killing us for the last three years. This is the SEC, man! You kick your opponent when he’s down and hang as many points as you can because as AL showed us 24 ain’t safe!! GET RID OF CROWTON
Looking over at Tiger b-ball to the right,
Centenary must be pretty effin’ bad, but it is a win and we did play Memphis close. Beat the pokes and eat up what looks like two more cream puffs—may not be—before Houston. Geaux Tiger b-ball!
(Real) Havey Pekar: I felt more alone that week than any. Sometimes I'd feel a body lying next to me like an amputee feels a phantom limb. All I did was think about Jennie Gerhardt and Alice Quinn and all the decades of people I had known. The more I thought, the more I felt like crying. Life seemed so sweet and so sad, and so hard to let go of in the end. But hey, man, every day is a brand new deal, right? Just keep on working and something's bound to turn up."
From the movie "American Splendor"
Tough night, but great season
I am hung over and depressed this morning, but reading this blog has me reflecting back on what has a been a wildly fun and stressful season to watch. It just seemed everything was going their way in the 1st half of the game. We did get some breaks in the 2nd half – but we didn’t close the deal with 7 as they did with just 9 seconds! damn that one was the body blow that set us up for the knock out later in the game.
I know we are not losing a large number of senior’s, but we are losing Nevis and Zod. That makes me a little worried, plus we still are not consistent enough at the QB position. Jefferson needs to mature and stop crying after bad plays, it just looks bad on TV when he has a fit after every bad play. Does anyone else notice the shrunched up cry baby face he makes?
Can we bring in a math nerd as an intern to stand on the sideline and tell us how to manage the clock? Something needs to improve in that department.
Lastly – FIRE Crowton. I feel much better now.
Geaux Tiger – finish strong at 11-2.
I agree
I agree with you that it is a character flaw to wear your heart on your sleeve while playing a man’s game, but the kid is really frustrated. His coaches don’t show confidence in his abilities – which I think are tremendous if they call plays that showcase his talent AND the front four do their jobs! I’d probably be po’d too. Except I might do a heck of alot more cursing than he does.
I agree
forgot to say that I also agree that Crowton must go! when you have Sheppard, Randle, Tolliver, Peterson, and a host of other receivers and can’t design plays to their strengths, you stink as an offensive coordinator. Period! Maybe, we can pick up the guy out of UCLA??? Word on the street is he’s not happy at UCLA.
O-Coordinator has to go
This game was yet another confirmation of my belief that the offensive coordinator, quarterback coach, and O-line coach need to start packing their bags. While most people thought LSU should lose 3-4 games this season, I thought with the raw talent these kids have, we should have gone undefeated. (yes, a couple of D-coaches better be on the lookout too – but we lost some heavy hitter starters, so they get a reprieve…for now) We had an offensive coordinator that kept trying to breathe life back into a QB, Jarrett Lee, they ruined a few years ago. He’s gone from being “Pick Six” to “We need 3 and Out”. Great kid; wants to play, but it screws with Jefferson’s confidence to keep rotating Lee into the game….and talking nonsense about Jefferson (Coach Miles) to the press. He was ready to play from the day he took the field for the first time. Too bad the coaches didn’t offer him the support he needed as an 18 year old kid. Instead, he was “just a freshman”, “not quite ready”, etc LES MILES. Meanwhile, freshmen QB’s were rocking the nation because their coaches backed them and built their confidence. That’s where Les has failed as a leader. But, back to the O-coaches…. plays that didn’t work until the end of the season = option to the short side, quick pass to the flat, running up the middle, line blocking long enough for a deep pass to develop. Those guys have got to go! Or, maybe it was just Crowton holding the talent back???
Jefferson
JJ has never been a top level QB. He holds the ball too long, cannot read a defense, and does not have any touch. JJ’s ceiling is average at best. Hard to win in the SEC with average. He did not get there.
Yeah, but perspective changes a whole lot when your O-line keeps the D-line out of your grill long enough to read defenses! It sucks to know your line is most likely going to let you get hammered. I mean, how many sacks does it take before you understand you have less time than a route requires. That’s why Lee has such happy feet and throws off balance so much – he knows he’s not going to have the time he needs.
Season came out at the high end of expectations
Hatcher hurt us in more than one game. We got beat yesterday by a team with a top of the line QB. Offense in college football is very dependent on a good QB. We do not have one. O-line was below average. Qb play way below average. D-line a little on the light side for stopping power running games. However, we are very young and have a lot of strong players back. We will have a very hard time being 10 and 2 next year w/o a better QB.
It's hard to beat a good team on the road
We could have played better, but I chalk this one up to the simple maxim that it is tough to win road games unless you’re a lot better than the other team. I’m disappointed, but it does not dampen (much) my enthusiasm for this team or for Miles as a coach.
I hope we go to the Cotton Bowl. We haven’t been there in a while. I’d rather the sugar, but I’m taking that to be out of the question.
Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.
by Richard Pittman on Nov 28, 2010 7:56 AM CST via mobile reply actions
Especially with a good quarterback
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 28, 2010 9:26 AM CST up reply actions
TRUE THAT!
But really, when I look back on it, this game perfectly encapsulates our team from the year: Moments of greatness, surrendering big plays on defense (more on that later) and offensive ineptitude
As I’ve said more than once on this board, I’m not getting any offers to coach D-I football (nor, I’m guessing, is anyone else on this site), so I’m going to assume that my frustration is borne in no small part of not really knowing what’s going on. Having said that, however, the frustrating part of this season for me has been what appears to be the mid-game abandonment of what seems to work; “adjustments” for the sake of “adjustments,” rather than anything that seems to make sense to me.
For instance, WHY didn’t Chavis send more pressure more often. I was shocked at the amount of time we gave Mallett to throw, much of it when the ONLY pressure he was getting was from a 3 – 4 man front, which the Hogs handled. You give a guy like Mallett that much time, he is going to roast you, no matter how good your secondary is. I missed the 1st Quarter stuck in traffic on I-95, but I was told that we gave him real trouble in that quarter when we got after him. I don’t know if that’s accurate, but I know my frustration in the 2nd half was not understanding WHY we didn’t blitz more and pressure Mallett to make bad choices (which he has shown a propensity for all season).
Defensively, what has happened? Honestly, I can’t help but believe the defense just wore down after having to soldier through so many early season games shouldering the team.
I agree that’s part of it and I share your hopes in that regard. I do think, though, that had Chavis been more aggressive in the pressure on Mallett, we would have held up fine. I AM CONVINCED that it was Arkansas’ last drive of the game, when they shoved the ball down our throat on the ground on a drive that seemed to consume 5 minutes, that cost us this game at the end of the day. That was so uncharacteristic of us against a “conventional” offense like Arkansas, I can only assume that our guys were just worn down. When I saw that drive, I knew the game was over barring another Miles Miracle.
We saw the atrocious offensive line play that ravaged our chances last season.
I don’t know if I agree with “atrocious,” as they were able to give JJ plenty of time in certain instances. But otherwise, I agree. The poor kid was running for his life more than he should have had to. I can’t imagine what it would have been like had Jarrett “Uniread” Lee been back there. When the line was able to give JJ time, we were able to take advantage of the Hogs “loading the box” with our passing game (e.g., the drive which lead to our first score).
. . . stick to our strengths (Ridley had 17 carries… and ran it at a respectable 4.4 clip)
Following up on the offensive line problems, Ridley’s production was – for the most part – all Ridley. That kid is a great back who could play anywhere, I think. His 2 touchdown runs were things of pure beauty. Glad we get him back.
Zod AVERAGED 40.8 yards on kick returns. That’s an incredibly high average for someone who didn’t house one of them. Even Ron Brooks’ single return he got out past the 30. Yet, we were unable to capitalize.
I have been disappointed with Peterson’s efforts the last 2 games. Against Ole Miss, he looked sluggish – like he was playing with the flu. What SHOCKED me last night was – with the exception of his last return – what appeared to be an uncharacteristic aversion to contact. Since when did PP run out of bounds at the threat of contact with a KICKER? TWICE! I am convinced that, had Peterson used a stiff arm and lowered a shoulder, he would have scored on at least 1 of those returns when the kicker forced him out with very little effort. The only return where I saw PP show his physicality was the last one. Surrounded by real hitters (as opposed to kickers), he did what I’ve seen him do more than once: lower his shoulder and run over some people. Had he done this when his only opposition was the kicker, he would have scored.
I am holding out hope that Miles and teammates will be able to talk Peterson into staying for a real shot at the NC. I must say,though, that his aversion to contact on those returns last night made the cynic in me consider that PP didn’t want to get injured in his last game and drop his draft stock. I hope I’m wrong, but I’m nonetheless disappointed.
On a hopeful note: What struck me last night, as it has every game since the Fla. game, is how incredibly young and deep we are. If we have recruited well at OL positions, we should be a serious, serious contender next year.
I can only hope we get an indoor bowl game, regardless of where it is, so we don’t have to contend with conditions like last year which absolutely stripped any advantage we had over what was, truthfully, an inferior Penn St. team.
This team is a work in progress. These are kids. I’m amazed that many of the same people who are willing to give new CEOs sufficient time to restructure an organization full of seasoned veterans and turn things around have so little patience when it comes to allowing a coaching staff – working with an ever-rotating cast of college KIDS (some of whom, let’s face it, aren’t the sharpest knives in the drawer) to turn a sports program around. On that note, I say
KEEP MILES! KEEP CROWTON! KEEP CHAVIS! GEAUX TIGERS!
You're wrong on this point
Chavis been more aggressive in the pressure on Mallett, we would have held up fine
Chavis dialed up a ton of pressures. Arkansas picked them up and took advantage. That’s the risk you take with blitzing a good quarterback.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 28, 2010 9:28 AM CST up reply actions
Which brings to light
We’re not as good at getting pressure as we used to be. I rarely like to rain on anybody’s parade, but since I posted that novel down below (sorry), I’ll just reiterate here that the D wasn’t as good as advertised, strictly in my opinion. Way better than 2008 and 2009. The line in particular. But still nothing like the 2003-2007 lines. I have watched QBs have too much time to stand there and throw way too often this year. The pass rush was better than the two previous years, but I think that blinded some fans to the fact it’s still not as good as we need. They are not consistent terrorizers across the front 4. I think that still needs improvement to get us back to the level we used to be at, and I look forward to seeing it improve from Chavis Year 2 to Chavis Year 3.
Chavis...
Always builds out from the line defensively. Ideally, he wants to get pressure from the front 4. Losing Sam really hurt here in my estimation. Sam was a superb run defender, but his speed off the edge as a pass rusher makes him someone defenses have to pay attention to, which only frees up things in the middle.
One elite player can make a world of difference on a line. Look at what Peppers is doing for the Bears this season. Not that Sam is Julius Peppers great, but he does have elite athleticism and a rare motor that none of our other ends have (maybe Mingo, but he’s too light in the britches at this point to really be an every down threat).
Extremely young Tiger team goes 10-2
That should be the headline. The big plays on D all season were mostly given up by really young guys. We also played through some serious injuries. I am not worried about our D going forward.
I am very excited about next year. As long as CLM does for the O what he did for the D after the Malveto debacle, we should be very good for the next several of years.
by Displaced Tiger on Nov 28, 2010 9:13 AM CST via mobile reply actions 2 recs
People will (rightly) focus on the end-of-half touchdown
But to me, the stat that decided the game is of the 8 total fumbles, 7 were recovered by Arkansas. That’s a completely insane ratio, and it is very difficult to beat anyone – much less a top ten team – when you go 1 for 8 on fumble recoveries.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Nov 28, 2010 9:29 AM CST reply actions
Plus
Even with the busted TD, the offense gets the ball inside the 10 and fails to punch things in. As unpopular as the option as been, it should have been called on one of those plays instead of the same goal-line toss that’s only really good inside the 1 anyway.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 28, 2010 9:35 AM CST up reply actions
You can't make the mistakes that LSU made yesterday
You won’t win often. The coaches failed. The players failed. This was a total team loss and it absolutely stunk. This isn’t like the Auburn loss where you can point the finger at the interception say, “What if that first drive had been turned to points?” LSU screwed the pooch on every side of the ball. It’s getting bad when you can almost always pencil in Arkansas as a loss for LSU every season. I don’t know what it is, but it absolutely stinks.
LSU was not a bad team this season. The 10-2 record proves that. But we know they were better than what they showed on the field yesterday. Sometimes you can have a bad game and win. You can lose more often with a bad game against a team like Arkansas. To play a bad game with BCS implications against a rival is extremely disappointing for not just us, but the entire team. All they can do now is pack it in and wait to see which bowl they’ll play. Winning the bowl game will make this sting slightly less. I’ll worry about next year after that.
RIP Ronnie James Dio (July 10, 1942 - May 16, 2010).
Free BLou
Coordinators
I think everyone here and in Tiger nation agrees that Crowton’s time here is well beyond done and probably should have been gone last year but I was surprised by the seeming lack of adjustments by Chavis. I think that the end of half TD would have probably been a simple long completion had Hatcher not decided to go for the kill shot and then kill Mo, but I think not having every db back at least 20 yards is strange and asking for trouble.
I agree that once we lost Big Sam for the year that our run D took a hit and then with Taylors loss we pretty much lost our best run defenders on the outside. I don’t really know what Francois did to earn a starting job but I am pretty sure he should have lost it to Lamin Barrow or Kevin MInter as both of those guys have made some impact on a game this year and minus an uncalled PI in the UNC game Francois has been mostly a non factor.
Overall I am happy with the 10 wins and will continue to support our boys and cheer my heart out.
Here’s to an outside shot at a BCS bowl. Geaux Tigers!
Coach
Crewe —
Man im one that hopes you are in left field on the Miles to Michigan (or anywhere else). I do get your not saying you hope just that it could…… To people that hope you are right:
Call me crazy but im a fan LSU winning football games. Mr. Les as everone knows has highest winning percentage of any coach @ lsu. Folks we are not talking about a Northwestern, Army or Vandy…. We are talking about a prestige school with a winning past. I would be pretty disapointed to see the mad hatter doing his thing anywhere else.
Anyway – Newer member of and the valley shook. Really dig the page … Glad I came across it. Great season …. Lots of fun! – Although yesterday did kinda suck. felt a little punched in the gut.
GEAUX TIGERS!!
Mike T.
Welcome
I hope Miles stays. The inability to finish with less than 2 losses at any point in his tenure is my only nagging concern, but that can change. After all, people said Saban could never go undefeated…
Crowton must go.
I think it was on second down on about the 5 and we run GoalLine pitch dive. That hasn’t worked much unless the team needed a yard or less. Then a fade route on 3rd down to the TE. I don’t know why the fade is ever call, It rarely ever works. Offensive Coordinator MUST GO. Throw the Bank at Bryan Harsin the Boise State coordinator ( power running with play action that gets the ball to playmakers) or Kevin Wilson, Oklahoma Broyles is a 1000 yard reciever and Murray is a thousand yard rusher. If we use the$ 2000 Dollar a window money, (which probably cost more like 300 a window) it should be no problem, hell even Norm Chow.
I Kneel Before Zod!!
I can't assuage your doubt....
I share it.
I don’t boo the team, I don’t think Miles is the blundering idiot the media wants him to be, I don’t pine for Saban, I bleed purple and gold, and I actually like Miles as our coach in many ways (I love that the team loves him, plays their hearts out for him, and as you guys remind us here—that he remembers the game is supposed to be fun. That’s missing in far too many coaches these days).
But I also can’t shake the feeling we’re never going to get that undefeated season I really want to see from us. I don’t think we’re ever going to dominate the teams we should like we used to. We’re always going to play up or down to our competition….at least that seems to be the trend. I’m happy for all the W’s, and you may call me greedy, but I want maximization. I want to see our players being used to their fullest potential. And, I know you guys are gonna burn me for this, but I think even our D was a TAD overrated this year. I loved that unit as much as any here, but looking back, we played some unspectacular offenses and whiffed on the good ones. I know the D is young, and mobile QB/misdirection offenses are tough, but honestly discipline, gap assignment, and fundamental tackling (lacking most of the year….sorry) will thwart just about everything. On rewatching the games, this defense had fairly poor fundamentals all year long, their athleticism covered it up most of the time, but it’s there. And when a team had as good of athletes as ours, our defense looked wobbly. Now, they were young, but I can’t say I feel rock solid about going forward next year losing Nevis, Sheppard, and Peterson. That’s only one guy at each level, but man are those big losses. National championships are not something I worry about. It’s a beauty pageant and history proves again and again a team doesn’t really control their destiny. But you DO control conference championships. We haven’t won the west and ergo the conference since 2007. In many years, 10-2 is good enough to win a division, but I’m sure you’ve all noticed the SEC is a Coaching Arms Race these days, and years like this one are probably going to be more common.
All that said……the defense WAS young and inexperienced. I was not a fan of the Chavis decision, but he’s who we got and so I’ll support him. There was a marked improvement between Chavis year 1 and year 2. If Chavis is the guy, these young kids will grow up and be The Man next year in the aforementioned 3 guys’ absence. If we see the same measure of improvement between year 2 and year 3, that will make for a better overall defense, even missing Nevis/Shep/Zod. What i DO have faith in: the fundamentals will get better under Chavis. i.e. tackling and gap assignment. What I do NOT have faith in: Our defenses ever being as physical as the squads under Saban/Pelini. Tennessee used to have fine squads, but they were never bone-crushers who got in your head like LSU used to. I miss it, but fair enough, even minor improvements over this year is good enough to get us an SEC championship with a serviceable offense.
I am realistic about this season. I read here a lot that we’re about three plays away from being 12 (or whatever) – 0. That’s true. I don’t like spoiling our fun, but I am also aware of the fact we’re also about 6 plays from being 6-6. I can’t look at one side without looking at the other. In the end, we are what our record says we are. I am happy about a 10-2 season. Unfortunately, I’m not happy that we finish 3rd place in the west. I do expect more, and I think more is attainable.
Because, on the bright side, let’s be realistic. Auburn and Arkansas were pretty winnable games with even a serviceable offense. The O has been a wreck this year, Ole Miss was fool’s gold, the Rebear secondary is atrocious and I had a sinking feeling ARK would bring us back down to earth. We won’t always be without a QB (yeah, I’ll get burned for this too, but my delusional optimism has never extended to believing in Jefferswag or Lee) and without a decent OC. I want to remind everybody of 2005 and 2006. I was never a Fisher fan, but one thing I notice is our offense has stumbled around since Crowton’s arrival. Even in 2007, if you recall, the offense had trouble lining up, formation penalties, false starts, illegal procedures, etc. It’s glossed over in the championship, but that offense was the most penalized in the country, if I recall correctly. We had an extremely smart QB who could see us through all that (and don’t minimize Flynn’s brainiac impact….there is a reason he beat out more physically gifted QBs to be Green Bay’s 2nd string). And of course we have no trouble remember 2008-2010. Remember in Miles’ first two years with Fisher, there were no mediots hammering Miles for clock management. The offense didn’t have those issues because the players understood the game better. They also demolished weaker teams because they were more “maximized,” if you will. Now, Fisher also got sissy-conservative against a real defense and he cost us some games, and thus I wasn’t ever in love with him either. The Miles/Crowton combo at least goes for the gold no matter who we’re playing. But my point is Crowton appears to be a good philosopher and play-designer, but he’s weak in the area that matters most, player development. I am tired of watching an LSU offense that is basically 11 high school phenoms running around. I have felt for some time now, that when we win, it’s our talent, and they’re winning in spite of the coaching, not because of it. So I am very optimistic that with an OC change, we have a lot of positive to look forward to.
I realize I said earlier that you can’t look at one side without looking at the other. I know it’s unfair to say better offense could’ve won the AU and ARK games and ignore the other squeakers. But I would opine that UNC, WVU, UT, BAMA, Ole MIss would not have been squeakers had our offense generated a few more points and maybe most importantly, kept our defense off the field a little more.
So, like you, I can’t shake the feeling that this team will always drop a couple games under Miles. But…..it’s just a feeling. Logic tells me that a better OC could help things tremendously, that Chavis will have us playing championship level defense, even if it’s not of the ilk of LSU teams past, and that Miles is good for the team in many ways.
I want more. I expect more. But I also think it’s within reach. If we continue not to win the division and stop getting SEC crowns, I’ll change my tune. Frankly, I don’t want a “nice little season” of 10 wins or whatever. I root for the team no matter what, but the standards of my expectations are set at division and conference crowns.
Sheesh…..sorry this got so long
Good comment
I agree with and support your sentiments, particularly regarding Jimbo. Never a huge fan of the guy, but we were sound under him. People talk about “Crowton’s wonderful first year” and sure, we were a pretty good offensive team (not as good as many seem to want to remember), but you are exactly right, the same problems persisted… false starts, lining up wrong, burning timeouts… this is something that’s bogged us down every year since his arrival.
Defensively, I go back and forth on Chavis. He’s had an awful lot of guys get drafted under his tutelage. He’s generally a very good teacher of technique, fundamentals… discipline. This year’s squad was quite the opposite, unfortunately. As far as next year’s squad… I dread losing the leadership of Kelvin Sheppard, but not so much the play. He’s a solid player that often failed to get off blocks and caused us to be gashed majorly in the run game. I wonder if a shorter guy like Minter will be able to slip under blocks easier and stuff plays… less flashy, but more effective. Nevis is a big loss any way you slice it. Peterson is a MAJOR loss just because of everything an elite lockdown guy means to a defense… however… it is at least the position we are most loaded at, and if Mathieu moves to the outside, look for a true freshman named David Jenkins to step in and fill his role as the blitzer/carnage wreaker/athletic freak/ball hawk/do whatever I want nickel.
Football is maybe the most interesting game in the world. To me Miles’ tenure has shown the consistency you need to be a championship contender. Winning championships are more outliers than anything. I wouldn’t be shocked if Saban or Meyer didn’t win another for 15-20 years. Why? Because look at history… very few coaches win 3 or more. It’s just damned difficult to do. “Average” coaches win titles all the time (if you want to believe Miles is average). I don’t think Chizik is anything ground breaking as a head coach… but he recruits well and is fortunate to have a once in a generation player. Note that the side of the ball which is his specialty (defense) continues to suffer. Talent wins most games. Miles recruits with the best and as this young talent matures, I’m confident we’re going to see a major uptick in the performance of our team (perhaps even to the “dominance” you speak of). First step in that direction is moving Gary Crowton along.
are there any good offensive coordinators that will be available after this season?
obviously there will be plenty available that are probably a step up from where we’re at now. any big names though? guys that will get the fanbase pumped up and optimistic just by being named OC?
depends if you're looking for a career assistant or an up-and-comer
or even an established HC name looking to get back into football. I’m not saying Mike Leach is a great fit for anything about LSU football but imagine him at OC with an offense as prolific as his backed by a defense as stout as ours are.
For career assistants, Malzahn is a legitimate target but he’s probably looking to head to his own HC gig soon (I’ve heard rumors of Malzahn to Vandy). Other than that, I can’t think of any OCs who have been consistently good who are available, even for the right price. Looks like this time of year we’re either looking at recently fired OCs, trying to steal a good OC who probably won’t want to stay OC forever and will move on in a few years once the right offer presents itself, or else trying our luck with an up-and-comer who hasn’t been proven as an OC either at this level or else have only been position coaches until now.
That’s all just my take on it though
My personal OC wish list
Norm Chow – Rumors are that Neuheisel is going to let him take the blame for the UCLA offense (they were decimated by injuries).
Steve Logan – now a position coach at Tampa, but formerly OC at Boston College
Dana Holgorsen – OC at Okie State, formerly Mike Leach’s OC at Texas Tech, more run oriented than Leach
Brian Harsin – OC at Boise
It wouldn’t break my heart to see an all new offensive staff other than Frank Wilson.
LSU - "...the defense you want to be and your girl wants to be with."
I wouldn't mind having the Crowton who was our OC in the Ole Miss game and the 2nd half of Bama.
But that guy appears to have gone missing. I’d love to see Chow. It might hurt for a year or so (players getting adjusted to someone/something new), but it could be worth it in the long haul.
Holgorsen's a pipe dream
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 28, 2010 9:14 PM CST up reply actions
Why?
He’s only been at OK State for one year, but LSU would certaily be an upward move for him. Do you consider him loyay to Pickens U, or Gundy?
One BCS conference school to another
Is not an upward move unless a promotion or money is involved. He’s already an OC, so LSU’s can’t offer him a promotion, and the chances of outbidding T.Boone Pickens are slim (no pun intended).
I really need to write a coach hiring guidelines piece I’ve had in my head. There are realistic hires and unrealistic ones. Holgorsen is the latter. Somebody like Baylor OC Kevin Montgomery is a far more realistic possibility.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 28, 2010 9:47 PM CST up reply actions
What I meant
was that Ok State is second fiddle (by a large margin) within its own state and second tier in thier own conference (never won a conference champshionship in FB). Holgorsen learned at Texas Tech (also second tier), paid some dues at Houston (third tier?), so LSU would, in my opinion, be an upgrade for him. I suspect he is looking for upward mobility and holds no special feeling for OK State. Wonder if he, like me, thinks LSU would be a step up.
Being able to keep for a few years somelike like Montgomery, may very well make him the more attractive target. And he or his like would come at a lower starting salary.
I’d love to see you thoughts on hiring guidelines. A few thoughts that come to my mind……. Do you hire for the immediate dividends with no regard for how long you may be able to retain? Do you look for local ties that may help in retention and certainly help in relationships with HS coaches and therefore recruiting? Do you hire to fit “your system” or let the new comer do as he pleases in regards to scheme?
You're looking at it emotionally
Oklahoma State is a ranked team in a BCS conference (and in a league where offense is much easier to come by). Coaches don’t leave jobs like that for another BCS conference job unless there’s a personal reason or a monetary one.
Realistically, he doesn’t gain anything. And like I said, its really doubtful LSU could (or would) make an offer OSU couldn’t match.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 9:46 AM CST up reply actions
Actually, let me rephrase
Its not so much emotional. But you have to look at it from a business perspective. The prestige of the school just doesn’t matter to coaches anymore — we’ve seen that play out with multiple high-profile head jobs recently as well.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 9:49 AM CST up reply actions
Holgorsen
I think pipe dream is a bit too strong. I don’t think he’s married to Okie State. Earlier this season he was still living in a hotel suite in Stillwater and he might be interested LSU. Given that Crowton is one of the top ten compensated assistants, LSU could probably be competitive.
All that said, I agree it’s unlikely. His next stop is most likely a head coaching gig somewhere. I think the ultimate reason it’s unlikely is that his philosophy won’t mesh with Miles’. Holgorsen is an Air Raid guy with more running than Leach, and Miles (if he changes OCs) is likely to be looking for a more pro-style, power running offense.
LSU - "...the defense you want to be and your girl wants to be with."
Holgorsen
is a Air Raid guy but also a QB developer guy. Harrell at Tech, Keenan at Houston and Weeden at OK State are his guys. Think about it.
His present salary is not in Crowden’s league. Now Pickens is 82 years old and has stated his wish to have FB success before he dies and he does still have plenty of money………….
Business perspective is the way I’m looking at it. It’s all about getting to the next level in terms of money and in terms of respect and recogintion. He won’t get that at OK State unless they beat both Texas and OU in the same season, and that’s not likely. The best shot they ever had and maybe ever will have was last Sat. With a QB playing at the level of his past pupils, I like the changes of bigger success at LSU as compared to OK State.
And you're darn right
I am looking at it emotionally. I live and die with LSU and last Sat I died a little.
For the coaches, it's business
Not emotional. Holgorsen’s not leaving that job — which is a very good job for him — until he gets a head coaching job.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 11:20 AM CST up reply actions
Trust me, I would love Holgorsen
When I say he’s a pipe dream, its because objectively there’s little chance of it happening.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 11:28 AM CST up reply actions
I'm glad you amended your last post
cause it sounded like you don’t think LSU would be an upgrade for Holgorsen over OK State. And surely you don’t think that?
Yes he is a long shot as is anyone else you can name. To have the family situation, the salary situation, the relationship with the heas coach and others all line up is very difficult. But you gotta go for the best available at all times.
I don’t like the Air Raid style, but I sure like the QBs he has developed. So if this guy gives LSU the best chance, they should to after it till it doesn’t give the best chance.
I think there are a lot of quality OC/QB coaches
That could be very available. I don’t happen to think Holgorsen’s on the available list. Same thing with somebody like Gus Malzahn.
Would I rather coach at LSU than OSU? Of course. But its not about what you or I think, its about the market really. The days of the “prestige” of a job mattering are pretty much over.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 11:40 AM CST up reply actions
One last thing on this
How do you say pestige doesn’t matter if the market is the driving force. Prestige plus success and exposure equals hot assistant followed by better and better opportunities. This guy went from Texas Tech to Houston to OSU chasing opportunity.
He went from TT to Houston
To get to actually call his own plays. He wasn’t doing that at Tech. And Houston to OSU is an upgrade, from a non-AQ school to a BCS one.
And when I say prestige doesn’t matter, I mean it doesn’t matter more than moving up the ladder/$ does. He’s not going to come to LSU "just because its LSU." Coordinators don’t jump from one BCS conference school to another unless money or some sort of personal issues are involved. That’s just how it works, and how it has for some time now.
You can’t find a single example to the contrary in the last 10 years.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 4:00 PM CST up reply actions
No I can't name a particular situation
where a coordinator jumped from one position to an equal position other than for money or personal reasons. I’ll give you that. But I think LSU is better situation than OK State for the reason I’ve already stated. And he may very well think the same.
Consider how much better are SEC conference championships and BCS bowls (or the potential of a national championship) as opposed to an also ran, sometimes play em tough B12 team that has accomplished none of these and lilely won’t.
Again exposure and success equals more opportunities and more money. It’s worth a phone call.
Only situation I can think of that might be similar is
Chizik from AU to Texas. Muschamp made the same jump, but he also got the HCIW title from UT. I don’t think Chizik did.
Chizik
Got a big raise.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 10:16 PM CST up reply actions
There are plenty of situations
where head coaches and assistants have jumped between BCS programs, so I don’t know why coordinators would be immune.
On LSU’s staff, Miles came over from Okie State,
Gonzales from Florida, Wilson from Tennessee, and Cooper from USCe. I’m sure all those guys got more money for jumping (and each had personal reasons as well) but it’s not unprecedented for lateral hops between BCS programs at those levels.
LSU - "...the defense you want to be and your girl wants to be with."
Well
Gonzo got a “Passing game coordinator” title (whatever that means) … I think he also felt like he’d never get a fair shake to expand his horizons under Meyer b/c Meyer was his WR coach. Similar to why Josh Henson left LSU … Henson played OL under Miles and he felt like he’d always be stuck as a TE coach so he went to Mizzou for “promotion” (I think he’s co-OL coach)
Wilson didn’t have a job … Kiffykins left Tennessee and Dooley was coming in. I don’t know if Dooley wanted to keep Wilson or not, but we were in the market for an RB coach so he came here.
I think Cooper got a little more responsibility too … I think he was just the Safeties coach at USCe but is DB coach here.
I think the point that Billy is trying to make is that coaches change jobs b/c they get promotions or more responsibility or more money. Next promotion for Holgorsen would be to HC, which he’s not getting at LSU. There isn’t much more responsibility LSU could offer him than OC, nor would we offer him so much more money that Okie St. can’t match. He has no ties to LSU/Louisiana so there is little reason to come to LSU other than him absolutely hating Stillwater/Okie St.
I'm pretty sure
Wilson left before Kiffykins bolted to USCw. He wanted to get closer to home.
I agree with Billy that Holgorsen’s next stop is most likely a head coaching gig, but I think there is something to be said for being OC at a school with a decent chance at a BCS bowl every year. Texas and OU are likely to bounce back next year and A&M is improving. If OSU couldn’t break through to the BCS this year, they’re not likely to any time soon. He might (repeat, might) be intrigued at the thought of turning around the offense with a top 10 defense and special teams to back him up next year.
I agree with you and Billy his next stop is most likely a head coaching gig somewhere. But I think dismissing the possibility of convincing him to come here out of hand as a pipe dream is too strong.
LSU - "...the defense you want to be and your girl wants to be with."
Frank got a raise
Because he was also named recruiting coordinator. Ditto Gonzales (and it now appears he may have just wanted out of Gainesville).
These were not pure lateral jumps. Incentives were involved above “just coming to LSU.”
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 10:19 PM CST up reply actions
Its worth a phone call
To offer the gig to Gus Malzahn too. But he ain’t coming, and neither is Holgorsen.
BCS coordinators do not leave good jobs unless money/promotions or personal issues are involved.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 10:21 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not sure I agree with your sentiments on this one...
LSU gives Holgorsen a lot of things he will never get at OSU, namely a chance to put his offense on national television almost every week.
OSU is an also ran program in the Big 12 that benefitted from playing an easy schedule and a down year in the Big 12. They’ll be back to 4-5 losses next year.
And I don’t just say this as an LSU fan. Moving from OSU to any significant tier 1 job is something Dana would be smart to consider. For instance, if Malzahn leaves… Dana would be crazy not to consider that job, unless they are on probation. If Florida fires Addazio and says “hey we got a throw first QB, let’s give Dana a call” he’d be insane not to listen (though Florida is notoriously stingy with their $$$$).
If Texas came calling, you honestly don’t think he’d consider it “because coaches don’t make lateral moves?”
Don’t get me wrong; I think Dana stays at OSU. TBoone should up his salary nicely, but I just don’t buy that moving from a school like OSU to LSU is a “lateral” move.
Also, Gundy calls the plays at OSU… so gives him the chance to spread his wings a little more there too.
Actually,
Gundy gave up playcalling this year for Holgorsen. That was a frequent topic in the final minutes of the Bedlam Game broadcast.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 30, 2010 8:38 AM CST up reply actions
And to add
This is kind of my point though. Can you call? Yeah. Will he listen? Probably. Can you realistically offer him something OSU won’t? Not really.
He’s probably the second-hottest coordinator in the country right now behind Gus Malzahn. What would he realistically gain at a “bigger” school outside of a paycheck (and if Texas did call, you can bet it would be with some sort of godfather 7-figure offer — LSU pays well, but not that well)? Another 40-point a game offense? He’s got that now. If anything, that’s less likely to happen in the SEC against better defenses.
He can stay at OSU until a lower-rung BCS school or a mid-major offers him a head job, as is typical for most major coordinators, and that’s what he’ll probably do. Can he be hoped for here? I guess, people can hope for a lot of things.
But the chances are somewhere between slim and none. There are just a lot more realistic possibilities.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 30, 2010 8:49 AM CST up reply actions
Billy
Paul seems to agree with me in that OSU is not at the same level as LSU (or OU or Texas or Florida etc.) in terms of history, prestige or potential. Successes at these places will translate to a better opportunity sooner. LSU would provide that to Holgorsen. And success he may bring to LSU, if only for a short time, only enhances our prestige and reputation.
That’s the point I have been pushing. To dismiss this chance as a “pipe dream” may not recognize some folk’s ambition and drive to continue to move up the food chain.
And I disagree
Prestige just doesn’t matter more than money anymore. I’m sorry, that’s just how it is. If you can point to a major coordinator hire in the last 10-15 years that didn’t involve more money, control or a promotion, or some sort of personal issue, I’ll give it to you.
But every example suggested thus far has involved one of those 4 things. Does the “prestige” of a bigger school get you those things? Yeah. But nobody’s gonna take a job at Texas “just because it’s Texas.” They take it because “it’s Texas and they pay more (or one of the other things i mentioned).”
And that’s my point.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 30, 2010 10:22 AM CST up reply actions
My buddy runs stats for OSU...
And said Gundy is still calling plays. At least that’s what he told me last night, but maybe I misunderstood. He just mentioned that’s one thing Holgorsen may seek out.
I understand your point, but it’s really blurring the lines. Of course the four things you exclude are the primary reasons coach’s change jobs. Of course money will always be a factor. I don’t really think
I guess I just don’t agree with the reasoning that LSU does nothing for him that he doesn’t already have, which seems to be what you are saying.
Ultimately, it’s a pointless argument, because I don’t believe he’s coming here either.
If this is true
And said Gundy is still calling plays. At least that’s what he told me last night, but maybe I misunderstood. He just mentioned that’s one thing Holgorsen may seek out.
Then yeah, I’d officially believe LSU has something more to offer. But if all we can offer is the fact that we’re a better program, I don’t think that’d be enough.
But maybe the Leach rumors are to discuss Holgorsen.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 30, 2010 11:57 AM CST up reply actions
Paul
I live in Tulsa and “keep up” with OSU through the papers and local radio and all I have ever heard is that Holdorsen was given full play calling duties from day one.
And why a coach would not make a lateral move to a more prominent school for larger potential exposure is baffling to me. But it seems the point cannot be demonstrated.
Holgorsen...
Is actually still CO-OC at OSU, so LSU could offer him the significance of being sole OC with a pay bump and at a more prestigious school against premier competition.
Not that I think we got Dana...
But I do think there is incentive for him to move to LSU from OSU. Significant bump in talent, even more of a resume builder if he resurrects a prolific BCS school offense, $$$ etc.
People keep saying T Boone can outbid… and he likely can… but keep in mind, this is an OC, not a head coach and one with HC aspirations… so he’s likely headed out the door in a few years… I’m not sure either LSU or OSU would be compelled to throw 900K at him or whatever. He makes like 300-400K at OSU right now. I look for him to bump up to 600-700 realistically.
He'll get a raise from OSU for this year alone
Most likely.
T. Boone ain’t letting that guy go for another OC job. You can take that to the bank. And you can bet T. Boone will, for whatever amount it takes.
Remember, he put some subtle pressure on Gundy over the summer, and they won 10 games this year. He’s going to do everything he can to keep that going now.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Nov 29, 2010 11:22 AM CST up reply actions
Norm Chow is living off of reputation at this point
College football is the ultimate “what have you done lately” world, and in Chow’s case, the answer is, “in the last six years, not much.”
Don’t get me wrong, in any just world Chow would be on a bullet train for the CFB hall of fame for what he did at BYU and USC. But in 2010, he’s not the right choice.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Nov 29, 2010 3:59 PM CST up reply actions
and i would LOVE to play in the cotton bowl
new years bowl games in florida against the big ten don’t do anything for me.
i would love to see us play nebraska or oklahoma in Dallas – thats about as good/fun of a matchup as we could’ve gotten playing in the Sugar.

by 


























