Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Troubled Yankees Join Troubled Red Sox In Last Place

ESPN Says LSU Is Cheating, But Not Really

Well, ESPN ripped us a new one this morning.  In case you missed it, here was the OTL report on how we supposedly ruined Chris Garrett's life:

 

 

Anywho, here's the basic charge: LSU cut Chris Garrett due to the evil, nefarious plot of oversigning and according to the lawyer they interviewed, LSU is dangerously close to fraud.  Um, yeah.

Let's get one thing straight right now. LSU is absolutely desperate for quarterbacks.  Did you see what we trotted out on the field this year?  LSU only has two scholarship QB's right now, which has to be the lowest figure in the country.  Garrett is not a victim of oversigning per se, he's a victim of the coaching staff thinking he's not very good.  A judgment that's been, not to be overly harsh but here goes, borne out by the past season.

And this is so far away from fraud.  I'm shocked ESPN would levy that charge and let it hang out there without refutation.  So allow me: athletic scholarships under NCAA rules are one-year contract that can be renewed each year, up to four years (five in the case of redshirts).  A school can decline to renew a scholarship due to player performance, as athletic scholarships are merit based.

Now, we can debate whether this is fair or whether it's right.  Athlete's rights groups have long argued scholarships should be a full four year commitment.  However, as it stands now, the contract is one year long.  Garrett's was not renewed by the terms of the contract.  End of story.  To throw out the charge of fraud is simply irresponsible. 

Also, the ESPN "expert" talked about how oversigning was unfair to upperclassmen, giving the impression that Garrett was an upperclassmen.  Would it have been so hard for ESPN to point out that he was a freshman? In a piece on dishonesty, I found it revealing that ESPN failed to disclose some key facts themselves.  It was a hit piece, pure and simple.

Of course the piece brought up Elliot Porter, as if he was the first player ever greyshirted.  I'm not thrilled with how the whole thing was handled, but LSU has had a successful greyshirt program.  Guys like Harry Coleman and Trindon Holliday were both greyshirts, and things worked out okay for them.  To pretend that greyshirting is some tactic that ruins the player's career is simply false, particularly at LSU, where Miles has shown commitment to the greyshirts.  Elliot Porter had the choice to either wait a year at LSU or be released from his commitment and have a scholarship immediately at Kentucky. He chose to go to Kentucky.  Not the greatest situation in the world, to be sure, but Porter's career has not been ruined, or even delayed. 

 I've said before that I don't like recruiting.  I do think its a dirty business.  And it absolutely is a numbers game.  But the piece does not allege that LSU has broken any rules whatsoever.  I'm glad the Big Ten fans can pat themselves on the back for being better people.  I hope their moral superiority makes the losing football go down easier. 

This was a simple smear job from ESPN, and if that's the best they got, they ain't got nothing. 

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I wouldn't go that far though

Les wouldn’t offer a kid that was charged with sexual assault unless he really knew it wouldn’t happen again.

by nasa1225 on Dec 20, 2010 5:29 PM CST up reply actions  

An 18 year old kid can make a mistake

We all did stupid crap at his age. It doesn’t make him a bad person. He got drunk and groped a chick. Drunk, 18 year old college students have done worse. Give him a clean slate here.

by Big McLargeHuge on Dec 21, 2010 8:39 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

ESPN Story

I’m so glad I read your post. Viewing the story on ESPN, I was convinced that the coach was a legless reptile. Now reading your post, I see that the whole system is irredeemably corrupt and the SEC is gaming it for all it’s worth. Certainly puts last year’s “national championship” in perspective. And what’s up with Vanderbilt? Didn’t they get the memo?

by Carlinhos Perry on Dec 19, 2010 5:06 PM CST reply actions  

I agree with this.

“Garrett is not a victim of oversigning per se, he’s a victim of the coaching staff thinking he’s not very good. A judgment that’s been, not to be overly harsh but here goes, borne out by the past season.”

Where are all those schools clamoring to sign this guy; I remember seeing he walked on at Ole Miss right? I wished him well and still do, but stop your whining and take advantage of your opportunity Chris.

"Real Harvey: [the real Harvey Pekar introduces his on-screen character] OK. This guy here, he's our man, all grown up and going nowhere. Although he's a pretty scholarly cat, he never got much of a formal education. For the most part, he's lived in s*** neighborhoods, held s*** jobs, and he's now knee-deep into a disastrous second marriage. So, if you're the kind of person looking for romance or escapism or some fantasy figure to save the day... guess what? You've got the wrong movie."

From the movie "American Splendor"

by mjtig on Dec 19, 2010 5:27 PM CST reply actions  

Another lie of omission

Garrett is on Ole Miss’ roster. So his dream of playing in the SEC is, er, coming true.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
And The Valley Shook!

by Poseur on Dec 19, 2010 6:39 PM CST up reply actions  

He walked on at Ole Miss after he couldn't win the starting job at Southern North Western State JR JR College

What a joke.

And I like that they throw Elliot Porter out there who basically said, ‘hey, they gave me a choice to make as a man, I made this one’ – not “oh, they ruined my fat lazy life and my poor stupid daddy want’s to see if he can sue them” crap…

GEAUX TIGERS!!!

by SouthernMan on Dec 20, 2010 7:43 PM CST up reply actions  

ESPN did a segment like this alread

If anyone remembers ESPN did a segment about how when Calipari got with Kentucky and basically cut apart the entire roster. They even talked about how Saban did it at Bama. This is like the LSU version of the story

by HitmanHarris on Dec 19, 2010 6:48 PM CST reply actions  

I thought both situations were poorly handled by our coaches

My understanding was that garrett wasn’t “cut” but rather was “warned” that his performance wasn’t up to standards. Then Garrett left of his own accord.

If the piece was right that he was cut, then the whole thing was even more clumsy. Personally, I don’t think any player should be cut for poor play. Cutting a player for disciplinary problems is one thing. That’s on the player. If you give a scholarship to someone who is insufficiently good at football, that’s your own problem. You can be honest with him and tell him he’s not going to get on the field and invite him to transfer, but if be then chooses to take advantage of his free education at your institution, that’s his right.

The Porter thing was even more poorly handled. It’s one thing to offer someone a greyshirt, but it’s another to string him along until the eve of the season before giving him the news. If they had been upfront with him from the beginning, he’d probably be happily beginning his college career right now. Letting him go through a whole summer of workouts before letting him in on it was pretty poorly planned.

I don’t think it was done in bad faith, either in Garrett’s or Porter’s case, but was simply a matter of poor planning or poor communication, particularly in Porter’s case. It just seemed like Miles or whomever just did not consider the possibility that all those witness would qualify academically and got caught in a bad situation when thEy did.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Dec 19, 2010 6:56 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Poor communication

I agree with most of what Riochard said. I do think there were obvious faiures of communication and Miles is absolutely responsible for that. But the failure to communicate properly is a far cry from some sort of nefarious purpose. I highly doubt Porter was never told of the possibility of greyshirt, I just don’t think the coaches were clear enough with him. 18 year olds have a tendancy to hear what they want to hear, which means you have to be absolutely clear with them, which I don’t think happened.

Given how dire LSU’s quarterback situation is/was, I have a feeling it wasn’t just Garrett’s poor play, but likely a problem in attitude. LSU’s QB situation is awful from a roster standpoint, and the coaches would keep anyone they thought could hep even a little.

What chapped me was that these two situations were used to paint LSU as a program out of control, and the piece was so ridiculously biased as to be nearly worhtless. The failure to disclose some pertinent facts about Garrett (he is now on Ole Miss’ rosters, misleading the viewer to think he was an upperclassman) shows that ESPN is guilty of the same miscommunications.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
And The Valley Shook!

by Poseur on Dec 19, 2010 9:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Not to mention it isn't just athletic scholarships...

Most scholarships, especially those given from specific endowments or company grants & the like have very specific requirements to meet including & not limited to things such as community service, character goals, etc. All sorts of scholarships can be revoked for any number of reasons which are listed in the scholarship generally.

For an athlete to act like they don’t know scholarships are one-year renewable contracts is disingenious at best & if there is any fraud whatsoever it’s on the part of the athlete to say they don’t know this.

Please, this is ESPN doing what media outlets do- creating a story running loose with the facts & actual non-legal issues & playing on people’s ignorance of those facts of scholarship agreements by using people with them somehow being “victims.”

I must create my belief system lest I be enslaved by another - Thomas Paine

by Curtis Bleaux on Dec 19, 2010 6:57 PM CST reply actions  

Wow. That piece could have been done on any school that is good enough to recrute that many people. I would have to guess that is quite a few. It has to be herbstreet — he cant stand the SEC owns osu…lol.

Mike T.

by who_dat007 on Dec 19, 2010 8:28 PM CST reply actions  

Haha..

I was about to say Herbstreit has to be behind this.

by Mikeno on Dec 20, 2010 1:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Off topic,

Matt Flynn playing well for the Pack tonight—only the first half so far, but he is 11/18 143 yards and 2 TDs. Not a big fan of the Pack, but I’m happy for him.

"Real Harvey: [the real Harvey Pekar introduces his on-screen character] OK. This guy here, he's our man, all grown up and going nowhere. Although he's a pretty scholarly cat, he never got much of a formal education. For the most part, he's lived in s*** neighborhoods, held s*** jobs, and he's now knee-deep into a disastrous second marriage. So, if you're the kind of person looking for romance or escapism or some fantasy figure to save the day... guess what? You've got the wrong movie."

From the movie "American Splendor"

by mjtig on Dec 19, 2010 8:45 PM CST reply actions  

Off Topic and Heartwarming

I was very proud to be an LSU Tiger Fan last night after watching Matt Flynn start his first game in the NFL. To say that Matt played well is an understatement. To me, Matt looked much better than a lot of starting quarterbacks in the NFL. And, you could tell he was having the time of his life playing on that field. Matt even outshone Tom Brady, one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL. Matt’s statistics were 24/37, 251 yards and 3 TDs, while Brady’s stats were 15/24, 163 yards and 2 TDs. New England won the game by 4 points, while beating their last two opponents by a combined score of 81-10. Matt’s going to probably make a great starting quarterback for some team in the future.

by Caliguy55 on Dec 20, 2010 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

"To say that Matt played well is an understatement."

Very true, but it was only the first half when I commented and was hoping that he would continue to play at that level which he did. Very happy for him and as you say I hope he is on his way to getting a shot at a starting position somewhere in the NFL. I will be glad when he is not a Packer.

"Real Harvey: [the real Harvey Pekar introduces his on-screen character] OK. This guy here, he's our man, all grown up and going nowhere. Although he's a pretty scholarly cat, he never got much of a formal education. For the most part, he's lived in s*** neighborhoods, held s*** jobs, and he's now knee-deep into a disastrous second marriage. So, if you're the kind of person looking for romance or escapism or some fantasy figure to save the day... guess what? You've got the wrong movie."

From the movie "American Splendor"

by mjtig on Dec 20, 2010 1:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Are there any LSU fans...

…that are willing to acknowledge that oversigning involves some seriously questionable behaviors? Any that are willing to put concern for football wins aside for a second and genuinely consider that there might be some cause for concern here?

Instead of attacking anyone who suggests there is a problem, shouldn’t LSU fans be demanding that their coaches and school leaders put in serious restrictions on the ability to do anything that might be considered oversigning?

College football wins? Yea. Neato. WGAF if they come at the expense of a serious stain on the reputation of a university’s academics and ethics.

I’ve long been an SEC fan and defender of the conference, but this oversigning crap is disgusting and completely validates everything outsiders say about the conference.

by Rangers100 on Dec 19, 2010 10:56 PM CST reply actions  

LSU is not that bad about oversigning.

I don’t think we’ve ever signed more than 27-28, which is a lot less than many, and we rarely even go as high as that. Usually it works out without problems. With Porter it bit us on the but.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Dec 20, 2010 6:40 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Get Real

If we were talking about any other coach other than Les Miles I might be willing to sign on, but not really. First off Les Miles is one of the most family oriented student athelete friendly coaches in the business of college football. Notice you dont ever hear of any of the players having anything but good things to say about LEs Miles. He truly cares about his players and coaches. Second. Notice I said business. College football is about results. Every school signs more than their limit of scholarship atheletes. And LSU’s 27 -28 signees pales in comparison to other schools like Alabama, Auburn and Ole Miss signing 33 kids every year. So before you deem LSU morally corrupt behind two greyshirts and a malcontent transfer please due some research.

by a75caddy on Dec 20, 2010 8:23 AM CST up reply actions  

So why don't you go

And bomb threads on other schools that are much worse about it. LSU’s not even the top over-signer in the West.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Dec 20, 2010 8:23 AM CST up reply actions  

Attack anyone?

My complaints with the piece were outlined above: it was dishonest, left out key facts, and made completely unsubstaniated charges. I even conceded what would be a legitimate discussion, and outlined my own problems with recruiting. Yet somehow I’m attacking “anyone who suggests there is a problem”? ESPN ran a completely one sided piece that mislead the viewer on several fronts, yet I’m supposed to treat their hit piece with respect? Even their completely untenable and irresponsible charge of fraud? Get real. I responded with more dignity than that piece deserved.

LSU is not signing 30 players a year, it signed 26 last season, and the unexpected happened: every single player academically qualified. I hate to be the one to point out that recruiting is nothing but a numbers game, and signing a few extra kids with the expectation some players will not qualified is simply smart business practice. The problem is when coaches do not effectively communicate to a player about what happens if everyone qualifies. One should be honest with the recruits and tell them what is going on. Let them make an informed choice and whether they wish to take the chance.

I’m sorry, but attrition is normal at every school (even the Big Ten). Even ESPN’s piece stated that the average SEC school signs about 100 players when there is a cap of 85 on roster. Which means, in order to make the number, a whopping four kids must leave each season. Which isn’t a large number, and even ESPN admitted that some attrition is natural.

I think a little bit of oversigning is actually a good thing, and the failure to do so is incredibly short sighted. I’d agree that signing 30 kids is a problem, but that’s also against the rules now. But planning for attrition and academic non-qualifiers is not dastardly or “disgusting”, its completely logical.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
And The Valley Shook!

by Poseur on Dec 20, 2010 8:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Reply fail

I meant to post my comment underneath to you, but that’s my arguement. It can be regulated better so as not to get out of hand. I don’t like that some conferences can do it and some can’t. We need uniform rules and I think the SEC is right on this and the big 10 is wrong. You need some level of oversigning

by Big McLargeHuge on Dec 20, 2010 10:02 AM CST up reply actions  

on a few specifc comments of yours
Instead of attacking anyone who suggests there is a problem, shouldn’t LSU fans be demanding that their coaches and school leaders put in serious restrictions on the ability to do anything that might be considered oversigning?

I have never seen any of the editors or writers for this site attack anyone. Joe Alleva is the same guy that disbanded Duke Lacrosse before they ever had a trial. He made sure Ackiem Hicks was suspended before the investigation was through. He took 2 schollarships away from us for that incident despite the fact that we never played an ineligible player. We are very conservative towards compliance with the NCAA bylaws and have not violated any of them in the practice of oversigning. On why I defend oversigning, see below in my previous post.

College football wins? Yea. Neato. WGAF if they come at the expense of a serious stain on the reputation of a university’s academics and ethics.

This is why we need to more clearly voice the other side of oversigning. People are going to get all over us about this and never consider the other side of it. We need this issue dealt with uniformly only after acknowledging the benefits. I’d also like to say that if you can’t compete for a starting position at LSU, you shouldn’t be signing to play here unless it’s your dream.

by Big McLargeHuge on Dec 20, 2010 10:11 AM CST up reply actions  

There was no "pot shot" here.

If LSU doesn’t want to be the feature story in oversigning investigations, then it shouldn’t oversign.

This is oversigning:

2007-2010
LSU – 105
Georgia – 86
Texas – 86
Notre Dame – 82
Ohio State – 78

by Rangers100 on Dec 22, 2010 11:02 PM CST up reply actions  

You are off base

Nobody is saying that there are not problems. But Les Miles is not one of them. This piece should have been on Saban and Alabama. Google Saban, oversigning, alabama or whatever. There are stories IN Alabama every year about Saban’s questionable use of the “medical” waiver or whatever it’s called. He can put a virtual unlimited number of players on that medical thing everyyear. Fact is that he has been running through players at an alarming rate since he’s been at Bama. He never did this at LSU. It is not condoned at LSU. What happened to Miles is that he had the highest number of questionable players academically that he’s ever had. He naturally assumed some of them wouldn’t make it. He failed to communicate the posibility of a greyshirt to his lower ranked players because of this. That’s the mistake he made. One player was blindsided by it when everybody qualified and was not happy about it. In any event he was an offensive lineman and would have not sniffed the field anyway, so there was minimal fallout from a football standpoint. As far as anybody knows that was the first time that had happened to Miles. And this is while other programs, and particularily Alabama is running off players left and right every year. Anyway, the deal with Garrett was that he was not working hard and was put last on the depth chart (behind the incoming QB that eventually went to baseball). He was warned that he was not living up to his commitment to the program and he was upset with the whole thing. He transferred on his own rather than be last on the depth chart. That is a fact. The idea that he would even be brought up in this program is a joke. Anyway, I just wanted to chime in and set the record straight.

by Gregg Franklin on Dec 21, 2010 8:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Oversigning as good for college football

First, my TOPS schollarship was not guaranteed. I had to make my grades. And if I lost it, they didn’t go and give it to some guy that was a senior who had been making good grades as of late. You work for a TOPS schollarship in high school. That’s where it was earned.

I don’t remember his name, but who was the overweight fullback who was suspended this year. If we decided to cut him because he can’t stay slim enough to play fullback, then that opens up opportunity for someone working their butt off to achieve their dream: a college schollarship. If you don’t allow us to replace someone like that, you deny more deserving student athletes of a college education and the opportunity to play sports. If the NCAA doesn’t want us to do this 1.) ban it and 2.) don’t wait so long to declare athletes eligible (see Alfy Hill Bama situation!).

by Big McLargeHuge on Dec 20, 2010 9:55 AM CST reply actions  

This is an interesting point

I know lots of folks who lost TOPS or other scholarships at some point along the way. Like, lots. But they deserved it, because they didn’t get the grades. If you don’t meet the minimal performance standards, you lose your scholarship. I genuinely don’t see why athletic scholarships should be any different (other than the usual unstated premise that athletes deserve to be treated better than non-athletes).

Now if universities want, they can commit to a four year scholarship and be bound by it. Maybe some recruits will pick one school over another because of the guaranteed scholarship, so schools that do this will have a leg up in recruiting. But I’m pretty sure LSU told Chris Garrett upfront that this was a year by year deal.

Don't Panic.

by 4.0 Point Stance on Dec 20, 2010 10:23 AM CST up reply actions  

exactly

It’s a renewable scholarship, just like a merit scholarship. If a kid gets a medical injury, he keeps his scholarship even if he can’t ever play again. If he is a discipline problem, or doesn’t go to class, he can lose his athletic scholarship. But he can also lose it if he doesn’t work hard, or turns out to be really bad. And it should be that way. We shouldn’t give an additional privilege to athletes that we don’t give to academic superstars.

by GeauxTiger on Dec 20, 2010 9:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Good piece Poseur

This was a good response to the ESPN report.

It’s easy to paint Miles (although they could’ve taken situations at dozens of other schools as well) as the bad guy in this. but the coaches are acting within the rules put forth to them. still it can be a little douchy to take away a kid’s scholly.

i think people should consider the flipside and realize that if miles doesn’t cover his butt with the numbers we’d get threads and talk show phone calls lambasting him for having to play walk ons at a place like LSU.

no one would call or write and say bravo, coach miles, you did the right thing, it’s ok if we’re playing with two walk ons on the D line. they would ridicule him for not being able to count.

by Justin Goar on Dec 20, 2010 3:06 PM CST reply actions  

Well said

While I do think there is some questionable ethics behind oversigning (which, frankly, is not limited to LSU or the SEC and should be taken to the NCAA) the fact is that ESPN really missed it here.

This was, as you said, a hit piece, and any journalist worth his salt should be ashamed of this making it to the public.

http://victorypolka.blogspot.com/

by KC_HAWKEYE on Dec 20, 2010 5:33 PM CST reply actions  

ranger100

This is no longer T-ball. Not everyone gets a turn. Thoes who are good enough keep their scholarships – Thoes who are not — sometimes don’t

To describe that as discusting and to say that this is only limited to the SEC is well … WOW. I strongly disagree.

Mike T.

by who_dat007 on Dec 20, 2010 6:14 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

Ha.

Only the biggest joke of an academic institution would have such a policy.

Hopefully LSU doesn’t really have your “this is no longer t-ball” policy.

The numbers suggest they might though:

2007-2010
LSU – 105
Georgia – 86
Texas – 86
Notre Dame – 82
Ohio State – 78

by Rangers100 on Dec 22, 2010 11:01 PM CST up reply actions  

YOU sir are an idiot.

You are basically saying that wonderful ‘academic’ institutions like Notre Dame and O(gonna lose 11 in a row)hio State have a POLICY to guarantee a four year scholarship regardless of the results of years 1, 2, and 3…

That makes you look like an idiot on top of being a troll.

GEAUX TIGERS!!!

by SouthernMan on Dec 24, 2010 7:45 AM CST up reply actions  

How stupid do you have to be?

To want to grant someone a FOUR YEAR scholarship? Seriously, if you think that’s a legitimate right, you’ve never gone to college. I’m sick & tired of many people in this country either thinking everything is a right they deserve or that they somehow are a victim b/c life comes up & bites them in the ass.

Listen, Chris Garrett & his apologists- Losing a scholarship to School A is the least of your worries. My dream of playing football died in November of my senior year of high school. I cried my ass off. But I got over it. Most of us have to deal with the crap sandwiches life constantly hands us & they come fast & thick after college, Garrett, so get used to it, you whining baby.

Chris Garrett is in such a bad place in his life…. maybe he’ll be lucky like Noel Devine & Deion Sanders will come mentor Garrett. Just imagine the travesty if he would’ve never played football again in college? HE WOULD’VE HAD TO GET ON WITH HIS EFFING LIFE LIKE THE GOD DAMN REST OF US. OH NOES! MAJOR REAL LIFE PWNAGE…..

/end rant

I must create my belief system lest I be enslaved by another - Thomas Paine

by Curtis Bleaux on Dec 20, 2010 8:43 PM CST reply actions  

I'll add this

The one thing that really bothers me about the oversigning phenomenon is that it’s a total one-way street. The players should have more freedom for transferring.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Dec 20, 2010 9:13 PM CST reply actions  

Far as I know, from the time you enroll, transfer rules apply

Unless the NCAA grants special waiver. Phelon Jones (who was let go for similar reasons, but under much more affable circumstance than Garrett) still had to sit out a year at Bama, etc…

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Dec 20, 2010 10:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about LSU Tigers. Best viewed in Wide mode

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Lm_deal_small
The Curious Case of Jordan Jefferson
Lsuavatar_small
The "Tipping Point" for Playoff
Small
A sad day in Tiger Nation
Steeler_small
Question About Michael Brockers
Imag0299_small
Morris Claiborne NFL Draft Profile Video
76224_20070106130217_small
KJ Malone commits to LSU at Spring Game
Grabboavatar_small
A Student's Perspective on Thursday's Open Practice
Tower_small
LSU Spring Game/ATVS Meet-&-Greet?
Small
Feheko Fanaika?
76224_20070106130217_small
John Diarse Commits

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

LSU Baseball

42-14

Conference

19-11

Streak

W1

SEC Baseball Standings

Last Update: May 19

# - SEC Tournament Seeding

Team Name = Eliminated from SEC Tournament


Managing Editor / Chief Lackey

Pb140006_small PodKATT

Editors

Gse_multipart30441_small Richard Pittman

Me_and_beer_small Poseur

Tower_small Billy Gomila

Paulcrewe_small Paul Crewe

Authors

Mike_snow_small actioncuse