Poseur Picks a Fight With Yet Another Fanbase
If you've been paying the slightest bit of attention to SEC football recently, you are intimately aware of Alabama's incessant whining about unfair their schedule is. Fortunately, Year2 over at TSK brought some actual facts to the debate, and I wholeheartedly recommend his post. Seriously, go read his take instead of this drivel.
SPOILER ALERT! Essentially, Year2 finds almost no advantage for a team coming off a bye week. So this is really just a tempest in a teacup, or just a way for Alabama fans to pretend they are persecuted.
I think there are two very real problems for the SEC, though. One, Alabama's central complaint is correct. Sure, they are whining, but that doesn't mean there isn't substance to the whine. LSU fans whined about the officiating in the Alabama game this year. Just because there was substance to our complaints didn't mean we weren't whining. And, frankly, no one wants to hear it. It isn't fair that Alabama has to play so many teams coming off of bye weeks. They are absolutely, 100% correct on this point. The SEC should move to make sure this sort of scheduling SNAFU doesn't happen in the future.
But here's the rub. Life isn't fair. We don't want to hear it. Alabama complaining that the SEC is conspiring against them is just one of those complaints that isn't going to garner much sympathy, even if you're right.
Which brings us to issue number two. The SEC, like most big conferences, labors under the image that it shows favoritism to certain schools. This is not unique to the SEC. ACC schools say it about the Carolina schools, the Big Ten is the Big Two and the Little Nine, and the Pac-10 favors the LA schools. The SEC has long since been accused of favoring Alabama, true or not. And changing the schedule on the eve of the season to help out Alabama absolutely feeds this perception.
Alabama fans have argued that this isn't favoritism, it is simply righting a wrong. But I'd counter by asking them this: if it was Mississippi State playing so many teams coming off of a bye week, do you think the SEC would consider, for even one second, changing the schedule just months before the season to make sure the Bulldogs didn't have to suffer under such a disadvantage
If you said yes, you are either delusional or lying. This is absolutely the SEC showing favoritism to Alabama. The proper response to this scheduling is to say "wow, that sucks" and make sure it never happens again. To even consider changing the schedules this late in the game just feeds the SEC's perception issue.
Besides, you want to complain about unfair schedules? LSU's permanent "rivalry game" among Eastern teams is Florida. Florida has been the most consistently great team in the East since conference expansion, and LSU gets to play them every year, despite no traditional ties to the Gators. I'll make Bama a trade: we'll play six teams coming off bye weeks and in exchange they can play the Gators every year.
Life's not fair. Suck it up. The last thing any college football fan wants to hear is an Alabama fan complaining that things aren't fair.
109 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
hells yes
I’ll make Bama a trade: we’ll play six teams coming off bye weeks and in exchange they can play the Gators every year.
pull the trigger on that one….. wait what’s that?? bama, didn’t want any part of it? weird.
That shows some awfully selective memory.
It’s not like Tennessee (our annual SEC East opponent) has exactly sucked since 1992. Florida’s been about one win per year better than the Vols over the last 18 years. And if you take out the last two seasons (Tennessee’s worst during that stretch), they’ve basically been the same team for almost two decades.
You should see
The comments thread on CocknFire’s post before Year2’s one…I got caught up for a good 45 minutes before I stopped myself.
Essentially, Year2 finds almost no advantage for a team coming off a bye week.
Key word: “almost”. But this is a pretty trivial argument to dismiss: if there’s actually no advantage, then the opposing teams should have no problems granting the changes. There are only two options here: you believe the byes are an advantage or you don’t. If you don’t, the only reasonable response is “Um, okay, we’ll move the schedule around. Makes no difference to us?” If you
Alabama complaining that the SEC is conspiring against them
That’s not the point. I’m not going to say that NOBODY is saying this, because I know there are a few idiot commenters at RBR who believe the whole world is conspiring against Alabama, but nobody with more than six brain cells to rub together is saying this. In fact, most of the problem is created by the SEC having too much space in the schedule to allow teams to schedule their own bye weeks, and they seem to have overwhelmingly favored taking those breaks before Alabama over the past decade or so. That’s not the SEC’s fault, but it is a trend they can fix by compressing the schedule a little bit. It’s pretty weak to take the arguments of the least stable/intelligent fans and attribute it to the entire fan base or the university itself.
if it was Mississippi State playing so many teams coming off of a bye week, do you think the SEC would consider, for even one second, changing the schedule just months before the season to make sure the Bulldogs didn’t have to suffer under such a disadvantage
If you said yes, you are either delusional or lying.
If you said no, you’re an idiot or highly ignorant of the facts surrounding the situation (I don’t really mean that, of course, but if we’re going to start tossing around insults, might as well play along). This issue was raised by Coach Moore at an SEC meeting and voted on by the other schools. They voted unanimously to both try to fix the inequity in the 2010 schedule and add a scheduling parameter to limit the number of byes in the future — it would likely be just as popular for a team that is probably going to lose no matter how rested the opponent is or is not and, in fact, Alabama’s “whining” is going to benefit everybody.
I’ll make Bama a trade: we’ll play six teams coming off bye weeks and in exchange they can play the Gators every year.
Bring it. Sounds like a nice SOS boost.
The last thing any college football fan wants to hear is an LSU fan complaining about an Alabama fan complaining that things aren’t fair.
FTFY
I'm wrong all the time.
I love how they keep trying to turn this around into everybody else is whining.
Its so desperate its kind of quaint.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions
How else would you classify a 500+ word post complaining about something that will likely have no impact on your team?
I'm wrong all the time.
by PeteHoliday on Apr 16, 2010 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Except for the tiny fact
That none of it would have happened had Bama not whined to the league office in the first place. Whining that had the potential to affect the 6 schools involved, even if it doesn’t ultimately affect LSU.
If you can honestly say you wouldn’t be doing the same thing in our shoes, I refer you to the “lying or delusional” line above.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions
so you wouldn't say that
three seperate post…on three seperate sites..from three different fan bases whining??
What exactly is your definition of whining? We haven’t had a post on this matter at RBR for a while before our “rivals” got their panties in a wad…
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
"Whining" would be if we, too, ran to the SEC office pleading for preferential treatment
As it is, we’re just making fun of Alabama fans.
Have a blessed day,
4PS
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions
thats the point..
and is one neither of the so called “rivals” have yet to admit to…is that your AD would in fact ask for a schedule change but don’t worry…poor ole little LSU won’t ever have to deal with this cause ’Bama had the balls to change it.
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
This
you are either delusional or lying
You should read.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Laugh FUCKING out loud…you honestly think that your AD wouldn’t say shit??? Well sir…you are a corn dog…
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
Stealing an Auburn "insult"
Isn’t that sort of thing supposed to be beneath Bama fans?
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions
im all for
putting some smack down on barners…create a thread doing that and im there!
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
Three?
Here and TSK sweetheart. That’s only two.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions
well honey...
go check our the Arky blog..
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
If you're referring to me personally, I've never commented on any Arky blog
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions
ok...good for you...
but my point is proven..thanks for playing.
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
im not...
im one who could really care less about it…i just find it terribly ironic that you guys can’t see that you’re whining about us whining…if you’d admit that..this would all go away…
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
Your 9 comments would say otherwise
I’d say you care quite a bit about what we say.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions
you've got me wrong...
i care about arguing against mistaken opinions…do i care all that much about the bye week saga….ehh..like i said. If its changed good…itf not im not that worried…
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
as you guys have said...
play em as they lay…BUT if it can change…im all for it.
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
That none of it would have happened had Bama notwhined to the league officeasked the other school’s athletic directors in the first place. Whining that had the potential to affect the 6 schools involved, all of whom voted in agreement, even if it doesn’t ultimately affect LSU.
FTFY
I'm wrong all the time.
PARDON ME I WILL ISSUE A CORRECTION
“whined to the other athletic directors”
There you go. God forbid I misstate the object of the whining.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Funny how if you use a verb other than “whined”, your argument sounds kind of silly.
Ever wonder why that is?
I'm wrong all the time.
Yes, because then I'd be using an inaccurate verb
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions
I bet having english as a second language puts you at quite a disadvantage on the internet, doesn’t it?
What definition of “whining” are you working with that doesn’t apply even more to this post than it does to a request during a regularly scheduled meeting that could easily have been voted down?
I'm wrong all the time.
“What definition of "whining" are you working with that doesn’t apply even more to this post than it does to a request during a regularly scheduled meeting that could easily have been voted down?”
I do agree that your post defines “whining” more or less to a T.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions
You wouldn’t have to be so evasive if you weren’t so cavalier about being wrong.
I'm wrong all the time.
Oh no someone thinks I'm wrong on the Internet!
How could I be so CAVALIER about this highly serious business?
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Given Pete's signature
I’m wrong all the time.
You’d think he’d have more self-awareness on this one.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions
I caught one!
I knew at least one Bama fan would rise to the bait. Thanks. But you make a big deal out of the “almost” when I clearly stated this:
It isn’t fair that Alabama has to play so many teams coming off of bye weeks. They are absolutely, 100% correct on this point.
I granted you that point. But you have to be kidding yourself if you think the SEC would even consider changing the 2010 football schedule four months before kickoff if the team affected was, say, Vanderbilt. They would almost certainly say it is unfair and they would work to make sure it didn’t happen again. Last second schedule changes to prevent a schedule inequity is practically unheard of. I certainly can’t think of one. I can remember teams backing out at the last second, but nothing like a conference intervening because a program has a tough schedule.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
To characterize the SEC as some monolithic, sentient entity is disingenuous. That’s true both of the “OMG TEH SEC IS OUT TO GET US” group and those currently pitching a fit that the conference is trying to rectify a scheduling inequity.
The SEC is a collection of member institutions. Every single one of those institutions voted that the scheduling was not equitable and that it should be changed for 2010 if possible and for future scheduling. They could easily have voted to change the future schedule and not the 2010 schedule if that’s what they thought was fair.
Alabama has no power here, they had to go to the conference and say “Hey, look at this… could we maybe do something about it?” The other members (like LSU, for example) could have easily said “Nah, looks fine to us!” But they didn’t.
There is, quite literally, no reason to believe that LSU would vote for relief for Alabama but not for Vandy. You keep saying it wouldn’t happen, but you haven’t yet provided a reason why LSU’s AD would vote for the ’Bama change but against the Vandy change.
I'm wrong all the time.
by PeteHoliday on Apr 16, 2010 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Short version - wah, wah, wah
Alabama is unquestionably the whiniest fan base in college football, with the biggest persecution complex. (To be fair, LSU fans are in the top five – especially those folks in the bizarre “ESPN hates LSU” camp).
They whined about Means, they whined about the textbooks, they whine about the schedule. The real irony here is the screwed up SEC schedule is a result of whining by Alabama fans who complained that a split into the East and West would mean that the Third Saturday in October would be played only 2 out of every 3 years. Remember that, Bama fans? When you forced every single other SEC school to work their schedule around you? So don’t come looking for sympathy from me.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 10:18 AM CDT reply actions
For what it's worth, I support your decision to pick fights with the Webels and the Gumps, as they're both insufferable.
Beyond that, though, we should at least work out a detente with the other SEC fanbases
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah...
… I felt real bad when I accidentally rattled Kyle’s cage over at Dawg Sports. I have nothing but the highest respect for his site and Georgia fans in general. That was my bad, and totally unintentional.
I can’t believe I haven’t picked a fight with Auburn yet. I was even (shudder) nice to them last week, calling them the favorites in our weekend series. I felt dirty.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
Maybe we're getting soft in our old age
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions
But then, Auburn fans suffer so many disadvantages to start with
It’s hard to kick them when they’re down.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions
OK by insulting Auburn fans I'm kind of ignoring my own suggestion.
I think we should AT LEAST be able to get along with Vandy fans and Gamecocks, and then work our way from there.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions
To be fair
On College Football Live yesterday ESPN analysts were reviewing the SEC’s dominance in the last 4 national championship games. When they got to LSU, instead of mentioning us as the first 2 time BCS National Champ, they made some quip about us being the first 2 loss team to win an outright title since the 60’s. They did, however, have wonderful things to say about Florida and Bama.
"Tiger Stadium is by far the worst place to play for a visiting team. It's like being inside a drum." - Paul "Bear" Bryant
by Chinese Bandit on Apr 16, 2010 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions
REPLY FAIL
The above was in response to “Short Version”
"Tiger Stadium is by far the worst place to play for a visiting team. It's like being inside a drum." - Paul "Bear" Bryant
by Chinese Bandit on Apr 16, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Looks..
like you replied to it fine to me. But yeah LSU was a definite footnote to the GLOAREY of Bama and Florida in CFL’s esteem.
What's up Ryan? ARGHHHHHH!!! oops. ~ Patrick Chewing
Seems like a pretty factual statement to me
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Never said it wasn't
But ESPN could’ve gone another way with it. Instead they decided to cast us in a much more negative light than the other teams. I didn’t believe all of the “OMFG ESPN HATES LSU” stuff for a long time either, but I’ve started to notice a slight bias here recently. My real qualms are with CBS, as those damn 2:30 games pretty much spell death.
"Tiger Stadium is by far the worst place to play for a visiting team. It's like being inside a drum." - Paul "Bear" Bryant
by Chinese Bandit on Apr 16, 2010 7:17 PM CDT up reply actions
OH GOD NO!!!!
Its so terrible to ask that certain rivalries that have been a mainstay for the SEC stay on an annual basis..FOR THE LOVE OF GOD NO!!!!!!!!!!
Seriously man..now your just reaching.
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
Right, right, any other school would've asked for - and gotten - the same special treatment.
So here’s my question buttercup? Why didn’t any oher school ask for the same treatment?
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions
cause no one
else has even come close to playing the amount of teams coming off a bye as Alabama..go read Year2’s post…
and btw..i LOVE off season debates..
"You stay bought into it when you see your opponent sucking air and physically failing and you're still fit and ready and you know you own his ass."- Corey Reamer speaking about Coach Cochran
There's still the little matter
Of Year2’s research proving that your whole gripe has no statistical relevance in the first place.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions
You left out the word “almost”.
Which, of course, negates your argument, but let’s pretend it didn’t…
If you believe it makes no difference, why do you care that our Athletic Director asked the other ADs to keep the byes from being distributed unequally?
I'm wrong all the time.
Honestly?
You really think the handful of games (a couple of which involve Ron Zook) are enough to negate the argument? Again:
you are either delusional or lying
And I care because the SEC has never been, nor ever should be, in the habit of fixing individual teams’ schedules when they complain about it. Somebody has a bitch about their schedule every season, the rest of us just sack up and deal with it.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions
You do realize who creates the SEC schedules, right?
And you realize that, at various points in the league’s history, the algorithm for determining those schedules has changed, often at the behest of one or two schools?
So then it becomes clear that the need to fix a schedule emanates from the fact that is broken, and if it is broken, it must be the fault of the SEC (since they made it).
Why do you want Alabama to have the lion’s share of bye-rested opponents?
I'm wrong all the time.
Fix the problem
Clearly there’s some sort of issue with the algorithm. Fix it, make sure it doesn’t happen again. But why should other schools move games to accommodate one?
People have scheduling bitches every year. Deal.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Because this year's schedule is already completely finalized
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions
For times, yes. For dates, you're wrong.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions
because the sky isn't falling
and the government doesn’t have plans to save humanity by building arks in the himalayas
Not that you're aware of, at least
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions
They did.
Every single team that has faced even one third as many rested opponents since 2007 as Alabama joined Coach Moore in requesting the change. The vote of the conference’s ADs was unanimous in support.
I'm wrong all the time.
I'm definitely going to mention this to a Bama fan at the baseball game tonight
“Oh hey, I don’t know if you heard but LSU took an off day yesterday. Do you think your guys will still want to play, or should we just cancel the game?”
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Nice screed you just put up on Roll Tide Roll
But you totally don’t really care AT ALL about this issue, right?
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Who said I didn’t care? I just think it’s interesting that opponents’ fans have their panties in such a wad over something that was completely non-controversial to their own athletic director.
I'm wrong all the time.
You keep saying this like it matters
I mean, I wouldn’t have voted against it either. That doesn’t mean y’all weren’t whiners to bring it up in the first place.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Ahhh, I see what you’re saying now.
“You’re right, and I hate it, so I need some way to denigrate you so I don’t have to focus on the facts”
If you had just said that from the beginning this might have gone better.
I'm wrong all the time.
Perhaps you misunderstand why I would have voted "yes"
Because if I voted “no,” I’m inviting 100,000 angry Tuscaloosans to spend the next five months complaining about how unfair I was in voting against their proposal and how this is IRONCLAD PROOF that everyone is out to get the Tide. Plus, it’s bad politics — if I voe against this, the Bama AD might vote against my next proposal. It’s just not worth fighting over.
It has nothing to do with the proposal’s clear lack of merit, as amply displayed by Team Speed Kills, or the hilariously butthurt attitude that you and your buddies have adopted.
Have a super day,
4PS
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions
It has nothing to do with the proposal’s clear lack of merit
TSK does a good job with back-of-the-napkin sketches, but his calculations are laden with arbitrary assumptions. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen him run numbers that didn’t bear out exactly what he already thought was going to be the case, which is awfully suspicious.
Even still, you must have missed his conclusion. I’ll save you the time of going to look:
Something needs to be done about this regardless of whether Bama’s 2010 slate gets tweaked or not. If nothing gets moved, Alabama’s lead over Florida in this department swells to ten over nine years. When No. 1 is out in front by more than a game per year, something is definitely wrong.
I'm wrong all the time.
His conclusion doesn't follow his calculations
“Even though this scheduling quirk is irrelevant in terms of competitive balance, it should be changed anyway.” Why? One reason – because Bama fans will complain otherwise.
Pete I must say this has been a lot of fun here today.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Another option: because his rough calculations don’t hold any water, statistically. His estimation of who “should” win based on records, with no account for SOS, weak OOC schedules or anything else. It also fails to account for the fact that wins by a closer margin would also demonstrate an impact.
The folks who do this for a living think the bye week is pretty important. So we can go by that, or we can go by half-assed statistics.
But in the end, even if there’s no impact, there is no reason for the scheduling not to be equitable.
I'm wrong all the time.
PETE!
Knock it off with the facts and common sense. There is no room for that here!
Save that for the Bama blogs, i.e. the blogs of the team that doesn’t have Les Miles as a head coach.
www.RollBamaRoll.com - Our logo has more championships than you
by BamaReturns07 on Apr 19, 2010 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions
PETE!
Knock it off with the facts and common sense. There is no room for that here!
Save that for the Bama blogs, i.e. the blogs of the team that doesn’t have Les Miles as a head coach.
www.RollBamaRoll.com - Our logo has more championships than you
by BamaReturns07 on Apr 19, 2010 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions
Clearly yours is a large brain
That works the internet very well.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 19, 2010 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Either I intentionally posted the exact same post twice - spaces, punctuationm etc. - because I knew
you would need the redundancy, OR the site erroneously double posted me. Probably the former (i.e. the first one, in case you didn’t know), as the Internet is fool proof (hence your ability to post on it with your assinine comments).
www.RollBamaRoll.com - Our logo has more championships than you
by BamaReturns07 on Apr 19, 2010 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Sometimes you Bammers
Make it too easy.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 19, 2010 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions
I love the fact that you turn to attacking other poster's intelligence when they don't agree with you
furthers the appearance of your ignorant viewpoint and failure to choose to address the issue at hand. Typical, judging by your previous posts.
www.RollBamaRoll.com - Our logo has more championships than you
by BamaReturns07 on Apr 19, 2010 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Way to show me how to not insult people
By insulting me.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 19, 2010 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions
And our viewpoints are no more ignorant
Than your myopic opinion that other schools should move their football games to accommodate you.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 19, 2010 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions
I blame Fulmer for this business
To his credit, he knew the benefits of having two weeks to prepare for an opponent and he liked to have an open week prior to playing Alabama. I also blame Alabama for having a “Get used it, we’re Alabama, this is what we have to deal with” attitude. Even though this has been happening for many years, no one ever said anything about it before.
A bye week is a great advantage to any coaching staff and team. The fact that so many teams schedule an open week prior to the Alabama game is a testament to the value Alabama’s opponents put upon beating the Tide. I saw it as a player and I still see it now as a fan. It comes with the territory. If we want to wear the crown we’ll have to deal with it, just as the coaches used to say when LSU fans would throw beer cans at our bus and Auburn fans would chuck empty bottles of Jack Daniels upon us. They didn’t bitch; they said, “That’s how it is. Deal with it.”
It sucks that we’ve had to play so many teams coming off an idle week, but it is what it is. Hopefully it can be regulated in the future because it’s not fair. I wouldn’t expect anyone to change their schedules so close to the season because what’s done is done, but again, I do think it should be looked at in the future so certain teams can’t put all their eggs into beating Alabama while giving only a normal effort against other opponents. The 2010 schedule is in the books. If we’re going to be champions we’ll have to prove it the hard way.
www.totteringworld.com
Good points, actually
I think that’s part of being the best – you see an obstacle and you overcome it. We don’t complain about playing Florida every year for just that reason (also, the game is usually great). It is what it is.
I also take it as a high compliment that Bama has scheduled an open date before two of the last three LSU games, and this year will make three of four.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
To be fair
A few LSU fans do complain about it (having Florida as the permanent East team).
But we’re not in that group.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions
A thread called "let's pick fights with Bama fans"
Is what politicians call “red meat for the base.”
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 16, 2010 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions
I wouldn't be making size comments
When my head coach is about 5-3.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions
That's just an illusion
He and Shaquille O’Neal traded parts long ago in Death Valley.
www.totteringworld.com
It would take a Bama fan
To put this much thought into his coach’s penis.
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions
Insert joke about how Bamagrad knows details about Saban's penis...
…HERE
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
Maybe that's why Nicky seems to always be pissed off
"Tiger Stadium is by far the worst place to play for a visiting team. It's like being inside a drum." - Paul "Bear" Bryant
by Chinese Bandit on Apr 16, 2010 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm usually the one at the party who gets everybody
laughing with something silly and/or perverted. I’ll start feeling good about myself (and I’ll be a little drunk) and then I’ll come with something really out there. Everybody will do one of those ‘huh huh and smile routines, and after about twenty seconds of awkward silence, someone will say, "Let’s get a drink." It happens frequently.
www.totteringworld.com
I just realized this guy implied
That Les Miles has an 8-inch dick and he thinks that’s insulting…
by Billy Gomila on Apr 16, 2010 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions
If you're from antiquity it was an insult
as both Romans and Greeks believed a large phallus was indicative of barbarians or subhumans.
/Not getting embroiled in this scheduling mess….
"Hush now, let it go now. I know it's time to go. Time to let this fall from my hands" VNV Nation, "From My Hands"
by Stuck in the Plains on Apr 17, 2010 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions
A passage from Aristophanes sums up the most desirable masculine features: ‘a gleaming chest, bright skin, broad shoulders, tiny tongue, strong buttocks, and a little prick.’"
"Hush now, let it go now. I know it's time to go. Time to let this fall from my hands" VNV Nation, "From My Hands"
by Stuck in the Plains on Apr 17, 2010 4:45 PM CDT up reply actions
I plan on applying for a NEA grant
This was my performance art piece I have entilted, “Poking the Bear”
Seriously, who else falls for a post that grants the central premise (“hey, Bama is getting screwed on the schedule this year”) and still proceeds to call the fanbase a bunch of whiners? I can’t believe anyone fell for a trap this obvious. Wile E Coyote was more subtle.
Thanks for the comedy, Bama visitors!
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
Poseur
You are the Man!
I’ve missed the debates around here, just glad we are picking fights with the Gumps and not each other.
Any thoughts on Miles? (KIDDING!!!)
Geaux Tigers!
GEAUX TIGERS!!!

by 























