ATVS-Big Televen Expansion Roundtable
Since every single LSU team is on the bus to somewhere today, It's about time we weighed in on the current insanity in the Midwest.
PodKATT: I think it's gonna happen, but it wont make a much of an impact. They should only pick up ND. It makes 12 and gives them even divisions and a champ game plan, but since the Irish wont budge unless forced, the B10 will have to destroy the Big East to force them to chose. They'll take Pitt, Rutgers, 'Cuse, Mizzou for balance and that should be enough to convince the Irish. And the Big Texteen remains a "meh" conference.
I really hope the SEC doesn't expand because of this. We have our problems, but it's nearly perfect. And there is no worthy pickup that wouldn't drastically change the SEC beyond recognition.
Billy Gomila: It is starting to seem like its inevitable. To be honest, I think the SEC can easily weather a 12 or even 16 Big Eleventy-whatever, depending on what teams they get. And since there's almost no way it'll be Notre Dame, and I just don't see Texas bailing without some sort of major financial guarantee, it'll probably some combination of Missouri, Iowa State, Rutgers, Boston College, Pittsburgh or Syracuse.
Really, what its all dependent on is if the Big 10 network gets big enough that they no longer need the networks. Because even if say, ABC decided to sign a big deal with them, that's only one day a week and at most, 2 games, which is nothing on our deals with CBS and ESPN -- and neither of those are going anywhere anytime soon. Its all going to be defendant on the TV deals though -- they'd have to be reconstituted for either conference to expand. It doesn't make sense to let more hands into the pot if you can't make the pot bigger.
Poseur: I think it's going to happen, but it's going to happen without the two big fish: Texas and Notre Dame.
I think 16 teams is completely unworkable, and I would hate for the SEC to try to "keep pace" with that. It's been a disaster for the Big East in basketball and it didn't work for the old WAC. There is simply no reason to go to 16 unless the Big Ten is actively trying to kill the Big East and Big 12.
The Big East may deserve to die, given its constantly floating membership in football, but the people who need to be nervous are the Big 12 honchos. The Big 12 is completely dominated by Texas both athletically and politically, and I'm sure there's some buyer's remorse from the old Big 8 schools, who have been swallowed up by UT and the Texas schools. Nebraska and Missouri, especially, probably feel like they have been somewhat unappreciated in the Big 12 and it wouldn't take much to get them to bolt. Colorado has played footsies with the Pac-10 for about a decade. This is a conference that really could collapse like a flan in the cupboard. The SEC will probably be unaffected by the Big 10 expansion, but it could be Big 12 Armageddon.
Billy Gomila: If the Big 10 pulled away Missouri, you have to figure the Big 12 would try to replace them with Arkansas. In that case, I would vote for the SEC to bring in Clemson first and foremost, as that seems like the most natural fit -- though it would probably lead to some reshuffling as they're a natural SEC East team which means one of the current ones would have to move West. My guess there would be Vanderbilt, which I like from an LSU standpoint because it adds a good roadtrip to the schedule, as well as another conference win most of the time.
But I think it has to be said and repeated: the Big 10 will NOT get Notre Dame. At least not while they have that NBC deal. It would be an almost negligent business move for ND to join a conference under their current setup. They get all the benefits of being in a conference in terms of scheduling, and get to keep every dime of a full TV contract.
More great reads on this, from Big East Fatalism, to Doc Saturday's far future predictions, ITB's call for other conferences to make the pre-emptive strike, and Team Speed Kills' reasoning that the SEC should just ignores all this nonsense. You can find even more opinions from the CFB world in the SB Nation Big Ten Expansion story stream.
Feel free to share your own thoughts and predictions below.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Arkansas
I think they know the grass is greener here in the SEC. They may have to put up with all sorts of “kick the Hogs out” talk, but they were far more of an appendage in the old SWC and I doubt they’d be any more of a central player in the Big 12.
I said this at TSK, but the Hogs have more than held up their end of the bargain, even in football. They don’t have to apologize for the quality of their AD.
Arkansas makes more money as part of the SEC and they avoid the instability of the Big 12, the very conference getting raided. I don’t think there is a very good chance they bolt from the SEC. Life is good here in the Nation’s Best Conference.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
Once you get to 16 teams you don't really have a conference
You have two separate 8 team conferences, whose champions happen to play each other at the end of the year.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 22, 2010 12:56 PM CDT reply actions
I wonder what rold the alumni play in this
With regards to, say, Texas. Would their larger-money boosters be cool with moving to the Big Tweleventeen, and probably losing (or at least losing heat) of their major rivalries, even if it made better financial sense?
I do wonder if the inverse could happen for Arkansas — would the Jones, Waltons and Tysons of the world jump at the chance to resume those old SWC rivalries? Though for Arkansas, that’s the only reason to leave the SEC. And I agree with Poseur, it doesn’t make a lot of sense.
But competitively, that may be a better fit for them — unless Petrino finally gets a defense going.
Any..
plan’s of the Big Televen going to 16 teams is just to force ND’s hand in joining the conference. The new Tenteen, realizing it can’t truly sustain itself will begin the attrition walk down to 12. Any potential conference member’s not named ND would have to have that in the back of their mind’s.
The SEC is unassailable. Nobody wants to leave this conference, and even in the event a team would leave (Arkansas), there would be no shortage of programs practically begging to become members. Culturally Clemson makes the most sense, but two programs hailing from South Carolina? Eh… The most likely, but probably not the most ideal upon further review.
What's up Ryan? ARGHHHHHH!!! oops. ~ Patrick Chewing
I don't think we expand...
… for the same reasons. But if we did, and Texas said no, my next call would be to A&M who might jump out of spite and the next call would be to Virginia Tech. VT really would fit in the SEC well and it would give the SEC a footprint in the DC television market.
I’m still against expansion, but adding A&M and VT would be a win for the SEC.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
Texas and A&M
they’re a package deal. You can’t have one without the other.
Yeah BoYeeEEeeE
by InTheBleachers on Apr 22, 2010 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Are they?
I mean, assume the SEC wants to expand and Texas says no. Isn’t part of the pitch to A&M, other than to escape the sinking Big 12 before CU, Mizzou, and Nebraska jump is to screw over Texas? Wouldn’t the Aggies LOVE to be the final death knell for the Big 12, leaving Texas without a conference, scrambling then to join one?
I mean, I don’t think it happens, but I know a lot of Aggies, and I think they would all jump at the chance to stick it to Texas. And I know they hate being thought of as Texas’ kid brother.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
Texas Legislature
So goes the Longhorns so go the Aggies. They’re joined at the hip and no way the Texas legislature will allow them to be split up.
Yeah BoYeeEEeeE
by InTheBleachers on Apr 22, 2010 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions
But I See Your Point
But I see what you’re saying regarding Texas scrambling. Sort of makes me think about Notre Dame and if the Big 10 and Big East collude to force them to join something or their all the way out.
Yeah BoYeeEEeeE
by InTheBleachers on Apr 22, 2010 5:59 PM CDT up reply actions
VT..
would be my first choice if it ever came to it. North Carolina second, but they would probably rather not part with Duke.
What's up Ryan? ARGHHHHHH!!! oops. ~ Patrick Chewing
Not..
that I would be against both joining.
Going to 16, maybe the combination of VT/UNC/Duke/Clemson would make the most sense(?). And then the ACC will raid the remains of the Big East. Like WVU and USF and others.
What's up Ryan? ARGHHHHHH!!! oops. ~ Patrick Chewing
I would love that
I would absolutely love to be included as a UNC guy. That would literally make my day haha
Yeah BoYeeEEeeE
by InTheBleachers on Apr 27, 2010 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions
SEC expansion candidate
Why hasn’t anyone suggested inviting Tulane to re-join the SEC?
Would that violate the SB community rules against being mean?
in 10 years
UNO will have a better football program than Tulane
Mark It Down.
Managing Editor/Chief Lackey-And The Valley Shook
If by "SEC" you mean "Division I-AA"
Honestly, I’d love to see Tulane develop a real, living, breathing athletic program, and an alumni base that actually cares. I just don’t see it actually happening.
Don't Panic.
by 4.0 Point Stance on Apr 23, 2010 6:46 AM CDT up reply actions

by 
























