Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

Texas Wins the Realignment Game


Texas A&M blinked. 

There's really no other way to say it.  A&M didn't want to be seen as the bad guys after Texas maneuvered the situation so that the survival of the Big Roman Numeral depended on the Aggies.  When the conference was being killed by another's hand, the Aggies had no problem ditching their former conference mates, but they couldn't bring themselves to be the trigger man.  In a way, that's admirable.  The Aggies are who we thought they were.  They are a loyal breed, and even though killing the big Roman Numeral at this point would be a mercy killing, A&M couldn't be the ones to do it. 

They aren't killers.  Texas, on the other hand, consistently showed that they only cared about two things: money and blame shifting.  Give credit to UT, as the ground shifted beneath them, they showed a remarkable ability to adapt to the changing situation and still use it to their advantage.  By Monday, they had found a way to force A&M to decide on the fate of the conference.  If A&M went to the SEC, Texas got to go to the Pac-10, a destination they have long since desired.  If A&M stayed with the pack, Texas could portray themselves "savior of the conference" while also remaking the big Roman Numeral into an even more imbalanced conference.

The Big XII started to fall apart due to the institutional factors leading to a competitive imbalance.  In order to "save" the conference, Texas actually made the competitive imbalance worse.  Texas also got a bag of cash from FOX, who saw an opportunity to get into the college football game again.  Texas gets more money, the ability to set up their own TV network, an even larger revenue imbalance among the conference members, got rid of the conference title game which the coaches hated, AND jettisoned one of their toughest on-field competitors.  The Horns are who we though they were.  They might be sort of evil, but they played this whole scenario out with Machiavellian brilliance.  More money and an easier conference?  Sign me up.

The open question is how long this can last.  The Big Roman Numeral is essentially a sham conference.  A&M's power play allowed them to get a seat at the big kid's table, but this conference is clearly set up to be Texas, Oklahoma, A&M, and the Seven Dwarves.  Baylor and Iowa State are only in this conference to cash checks and lose to the two power schools.  Mizzou and Kansas are allowed to stay just for basketball and their TV markets.  But it is clear that Texas does not view any other school, not even Oklahoma, as an equal partner.  This is the Texas Conference, and the other schools are expected to field decent football teams that will dutifully lose to the Longhorns each year. 

Frankly, this conference cannot last.  The member schools are only still members because of either fear or borderline bribery.  Kansas found out exactly how much the other conferences value their vaunted basketball program (not much).  They have almost no leverage.  Mizzou went from trying to attract the Big Ten to now being thankful they still have a conference.  Baylor... well, Baylor never really had any illusions about their good fortune to just be along for the ride.  Texas Tech and Oklahoma State found out exactly how much their recent success has mattered to the bigwigs (almost none).  This is a conference held together with duct tape and bailing wire.

What this deal does is that it buys Texas time to build the Longhorn Sports Network.  That way, when they make their next play to join the Pac-10, the conference will be forced to accept the LSN as a fait accompli.  In five or ten years, when Texas tries to make this move again, it is an open question whether they will bother to throw anyone a life boat again. 

Texas A&M saved the Big Roman Numeral.  They also forced Texas to, at least temporarily, treat them as an equal.  Now, they are forced to answer the question: was it really worth saving?  And has A&M really done anything other than just make Texas more powerful? 

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Dammit!

Made it past spell check, too!

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Jun 15, 2010 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Big 12

Originally started to fall apart because of a flawed business model that allowed one monolith to control most of the television revenue.

And they “stayed in business” by merely allowing said monolith to gain even more power? Yeah that’ll work. That’s like me saying I’m going to eat myself thin.

by Billy Gomila on Jun 15, 2010 10:02 AM CDT reply actions  

Lack of options...

… that’s what is keeping everyone in line. If the MWC ever gets a BCS bid, it might be able to attract a real TV deal contingent on stealing Kansas, KSU, and Mizzou. The MWC has to start thinking how to destroy the Big XII.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Jun 15, 2010 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Peter Bean of BON's take...
The problem with Texas jumping to the Big 10 is that Texas’ goal can’t be reduced to finding a home in which it neatly fits. You only concede your advantages when it’s more profitable for you to do so, and here, Texas’ incentive is to insulate itself from egalitarian relationships. The status quo is for Texas to remain the undisputed king of an extremely (almost unfairly) rich bloc of territory. And it remains in our interest to stay out of — and thereby forego the benefits of — a stronger, superior confederation, when doing so means weakening that base position in the home territory.

Bolding is mine.

Jesus, what a cynical take. If we wanted any confirmation of the Texas Is Evil storyline, there it is in all of its naked glory: we want to dominate a weak conference. It’s almost impossible to respect the Texas narrative.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Jun 15, 2010 10:14 AM CDT reply actions  

At least he's willing to admit it

But when Texas inevitably cycles downward, if they suddenly find themselves no longer getting the lions share of the TV appearances, methinks they’ll find this deal more distasteful then.

Remember, Nebraska wasn’t complaining about a lack of TV revenue in the late 1990s.

by Billy Gomila on Jun 15, 2010 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

True

I’ve read UT alum who said, completely seriously, that there’s “no way” that UT could ever repeat the mediocrity of the 1980s-early 90s because it has too much fan support and too much money.

Don't Panic.

by 4.0 Point Stance on Jun 15, 2010 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

If history's taught us anything

It’s that all empires fall. There are no exceptions.

by Billy Gomila on Jun 15, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

A pain we all know

I lived through the Smoke Laval years

Don't Panic.

by 4.0 Point Stance on Jun 15, 2010 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Miami, FSU

There was no way they could fail to dominate the Big East and the ACC, respectively. Funny thing happened on the way to the forum…

… what’s going to happen if any of the North schools win the conference and get the BCS money?

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Jun 15, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Goes back

To what Year2 wrote a week or 2 back about the best conference expansion coming at the mid-level. Compare what adding Arkansas/South Carolina has done to the SEC to pretty much how every other type of expansion has worked out thus far, and its not even close.

by Billy Gomila on Jun 15, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think the Big Ten

has done much better with the last two schools that they’ve added.

by Dr. Lou's Psychiatrist on Jun 15, 2010 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

LEt

I'm proud of my damn strong football team. Have a great day!

by Mikethetiger on Jun 15, 2010 11:12 AM CDT reply actions  

Let's be Honest

Did the Aggies really have a choice? Once Texas offered to keep the Big 12 together and offer A&M a lot more money to do so, did the Aggies have the choice? That is, would the Texas State Legislature have given them the choice?

Realistically, once Texas decided it wasn’t going to leave, it could argue quite well in that legislature that A&M should be blocked from switching to the SEC. After all, this move helps save Baylor and there isn’t a money difference w/ A&M getting $20 million. No way the legislature allows A&M to effectively destroy Baylor. I imagine that once Texas wasn’t leaving for the PAC-10, A&M didn’t have a choice but to stay with Texas.

I'm proud of my damn strong football team. Have a great day!

by Mikethetiger on Jun 15, 2010 11:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Glad the SEC didn't expand

I’m glad this thing is over (or at least paused). I think conferences over 12 are a mistake – the football teams won’t play each other often enough, and geographically, for most conferences it becomes really expensive and time consuming to play the minor sports. The Big ??? is a mess financially, but will remain reasonably competitive even with Nebraska. Honestly, the last 5-10 years UT, T A&M, TTech, OU and Ok St measure up well with OSU, MICH, Penn State, Nebraksa and Mich State. One could make the same comparison of teams with just about every conference outside of the SEC. So competitively, the conference isn’t really that much worse off. And if their estimates for new TV revenue are close to accurate, the schools should do well financially. So good for them.

I’m just glad the PAC 10 got screwed. First USC finally got hit for cheating. Second, they got stuck with Colorado – one of the most disfunctional BCS athletic programs the past few years. You could almost imagine that UT planned the whole thing just to screw with the Pac 10 and USC again. Almost. Now what is the Pac10 going to do – invite Utah to get a championship team? Sacrifice their “academic standards” for the $$ from a championship game?

by GeauxTiger on Jun 15, 2010 12:20 PM CDT reply actions  

The alternative would have been...

The remaining Big XII schools voting UT out of the conference, which would have been unrealistic. It didn’t stop UT from flirting with destroying the Big XII just to get more money and almost guarantee a shot at a BCS berth because they’ll no longer have to play a championship game to get there. UT struck at the right time when only CU and NU had contingency plans. You can bet the other schools are biding their time to see what happens next even though they caved.

RIP Ronnie James Dio (July 10, 1942 - May 16, 2010).

by Ace Venom on Jun 15, 2010 12:22 PM CDT reply actions  

More fun!

According to RBR, there is no TV deal. Also, Tech isn’t signing off on the deal. And according to the 12th Man, and this has GOT to be the wierdest news of the day, the “Forgotten Five” won’t get their share of NU and CU’s penalty, forfeiting that money to A&M, UT, and OU despite, you know, be the only five schools actually loyal to that conference

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Jun 15, 2010 1:28 PM CDT reply actions  

You know after the way the SWC split went down

This probably shouldn’t be as surprising as it is.

by Billy Gomila on Jun 15, 2010 1:35 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't buy it..

I don’t think Texas “won” the realignment game or that A&M decided it couldn’t be the “bad guy” or that they blinked. I don’t think anyone will say that Texas saved the conference. No one who has paid any attention to this situation really believes that. You yourself don’t believe it. The dominant narrative of this is that Texas really wanted to leave, but Texas A&M forced the situation to become unpallatable for them. Texas A&M, simply by threatening to split with Texas, saved the Big X. To me, Texas comes out of this looking foolish. Texas cannot show an absence of loyalty to the Big X and then accuse A&M of showing absence of loyalty to them. Texas overplayed its hand here. They assumed A&M would follow them around like an admiring baby brother, and when A&M showed some independence, Texas blinked.

Father. Husband. Lawyer. Nerd.

And The Valley Shook

by Richard Pittman on Jun 16, 2010 7:45 AM CDT reply actions  

Are you saying

that the PAC 10 would not have taken Texas without A&M? That seems far fetched to me. The PAC 10 was and is now still desperate and Texas is the big fish they wanted/needed followed by OU and then A&M.

I heard Mac Brown say this morning that recruits were asking about what conference Texas would be in. Maybe that started to worry Texas. But overall Texas got what it wanted, $20 Million per year and the chance to start their own TV deal (provided the new Big XII can deliver on the promise of a new TV deal) and that is the reason they are starying. But stay tuned, in a few years Texas will have another bite at the apple.

by bcooper on Jun 16, 2010 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

In Texas...

… the media is praising the Horns, and that’s what matters to UT. They don’t care if they are the bad guy in 49 other states so long as they can justify their actions at home. And they have managed to rationalize it to their base.

The Horns only cared about two things: money and blame shifting. They got the option which paid them the most and they effectively blame shifted in their own backyard, where it matters. And I really do think A&M didn’t want to be the bad guy, which is why they wouldn’t leave until Texas left.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com

by Poseur on Jun 16, 2010 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thank You!

Thank you for writing the best article yet on what has gone on so far in this debacle. It isn’t over, though. The anger among the majority of Aggies toward university decision makers is intense. Most Aggies clearly were strongly in favor of moving to the SEC and have been making their voices heard!

by David Imes on Jun 16, 2010 9:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about LSU Tigers. Best viewed in Wide mode

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Lsuavatar_small
ESPN: Jordan Jefferson questions game plan
Small
Show the top 2013 QB some Tiger Love, Follow him on Twitter
Lsuavatar_small
Rabalais: Liggins breaks QB mold
Small
AL fan Downing's lawyers: "ain't no crime, he was just joshin'"
Small
DeAngelo Peterson and the National Championship
Small
Miles and QBs
Small
Don: Boone is Staying
Small
1958 vs 2011
76224_20070106130217_small
I knew Les was stubborn, but wow...
Small
2012 cornerbacks

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

13 - 10

Conference

3 - 6

Lost 1


Managing Editor / Chief Lackey

Pb140006_small PodKATT

Editors

Gse_multipart30441_small Richard Pittman

Me_and_beer_small Poseur

Tower_small Billy Gomila

Paulcrewe_small Paul Crewe

Authors

Mike_snow_small actioncuse