Behind the Numbers: LSU v Mississippi St
Paul already alluded to it, this was one of the most deceiving box scores ever. You could look at the box score, especially the total yards, and think the game was close. It wasn't. However, some numbers demonstrate how LSU dominated MSU.
3 - The number of incompletions thrown by MSU quarterbacks. Contrasted with...
5 - The number of interceptions thrown by MSU quarterbacks.
5 - The number of carries by LSU running backs not named Stevan Ridley. We can safely say that running back by committee is over before it even began. All of those carries went to Alfred Blue.
87 - Patrick Peterson's all purpose yards, leading all non-quarterbacks in the game. Kneel before Zod. Yeah, he's pretty good.
7:31 - The time remaining in the fourth quarter when LSU punted for the first time, marking the first drive that did not result in points. LSU scored points on its first seven drives.
M48 - LSU's average starting field position. Yes, the offense started, on average, in MSU territory. Makes scoring a lot easier.
6.04 - Jordan Jefferson's AVSQBPI. That's his best performance of the year. Just a quietly efficient outing.
2 - The number of Mississippi St fumbles. They lost neither of them. Which means, it could have been worse for the Bulldogs, given their fumble luck.
11:06 - LSU's time of possession in the first quarter. LSU's first two drives went 87 yards and took 23 plays. They were things of beauty, aside from the whole "can't score touchdowns in the red zone" thing. LSU didn't have a three-and-out drive all night.
40 - The number of yards gained by MSU on one of their longest drives of the night. It started with 2:26 left with the game truly out of reach. State did win the yardage game by 4, but that was assisted by those 40 yards in garbage time. It's not just gaining yards, it's what you are driving towards.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Another number on Jefferson
3 for 6 on third downs he was directly responsible for converting (run or pass), at an average length of third and seven. Not bad at all.
JJ responded as well as you can ask. I’m happy he showed that he can come back from his worst performance and play a sound focused game. It shows his maturity.
by cbkao on Sep 20, 2010 10:15 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Your right posuer, the numbers were weird. We dominated this game but yet the only way to tell is the final score not the stats. If we can keep the improvement up I like our chances. I’d like to see us take at least a couple chances down the field but baby steps I guess.
by cbkao on Sep 20, 2010 10:18 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Another number
Team run effectiveness was 54% (21 of 39 runs hit the effectiveness level). If you need a refresher on run effectiveness, see here.
54% is pretty good.
My favorite number is 29-7
Even though I would like 36-7 or 43-7 even more. You’ve got to think that the teams main focus thus far has been getting to the red zone and sustaining drives, rather than actual red zone work. Now that the team is finding an offensive rhythym, the red zone issues will be next on the list of things to clear up.
by alange on Sep 20, 2010 12:14 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
This post is only made to pimp my new sig quote.
Straight from PP7’s mouth to my sig.
"I know the quarterback has a strong arm, but...I mean the ball's not gonna outrun ME" --PP7
That is one of the more awesome things I've seen quoted.
The correct way to feel about the other teams in your conference: "Lots of happy LSU fans giving us shout outs down here since FB beat Tennessee." ~ Duck volleyball Twitter
by AllSaintsDay on Sep 21, 2010 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions

by 























