Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Upon Further Review: What Just Happened?

ATLANTA - SEPTEMBER 04:  Head coach Les Miles of the LSU Tigers yells to his team after their 30-24 win over the North Carolina Tar Heels in the Chick-fil-A Kickoff Game at Georgia Dome on September 4 2010 in Atlanta Georgia.  (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

After watching and re-watching and re-watching, I keep returning to the same word: agony. To be honest, quotes from Joe Alleva keep popping up in my head: "We still won nine games, but I think it was how we won. There were games that we could've lost easily, like Mississippi State (5-7 in 2009). We held them down on the 1-yard line for four plays (to win 30-26). How many times is that going to happen? When you're 112 in offense in the nation, that's not very good. I'd like to see us minimize the amount of mental mistakes we make in a game. I'm talking delay of games, pre-snap penalties. I can't stand those things."

Well, with Game 1 in the books, we didn't exactly do anything to soothe those concerns. So what exactly happened? What's with the bi-polar performance? Who's to blame (because there's always someone to blame, right?)? Why is Gary Crowton still employed? Hell, why is Les Miles still employed? Who are these guys and what did they do with our football team? Let's see what the tape says after the jump.

FULL SCREEN VERSION

Star-divide

The Big Points:

-I think Patrick Peterson is still running on the UNC special teams. Jeebus he's special.

-I've remained confident in JJ all along and his performance Saturday only furthers that (sans one or two plays). JJ looked decisive, veteran, and in control. I love seeing him approach the line on a 3rd and 5 in an power running set, taking the snap and hitting Toliver for an easy 1st down due to the coverage being off. That shows maturity.

-Derrick Bryant played A LOT. Comes as a major surprise to me, considering Bryant's name was rarely (probably not ever) mentioned throughout the course of Spring practices, Summer workouts/camps nor the most recent practices. Yet, there he was, probably on the field 50% of the time or more. And he looked pretty good, particularly coming off the edge as a blitzer.

-Speaking of coming off the edge, did LSU ever yield 4 sacks in a single game last season? Considering we only registered 21 as a team, I'll take our current pace of going for 48 on the season (that would have been no. 1 in the nation last year, btw).

-Speaking of sacks, Chavis rolled quite a few new fronts out in this game, including one I don't remember seeing all of last season. We'd trot out 3 down linemen (they alternated) and 4 LBs/DBs standing in the gaps and on the edges. From there, players would drop or come, sometimes one or two at a time, sometime the whole mother load. This alignment got Sam Montgomery his first ever college sack. He also tinkered with some 3 down linemen while having either Montgomery or Adams stand up on the end.

-You can immediately see the differences in last year's D. Last year we had a solid, capable defense. This year, we have the potential to be a dominating unit (I knowz, I knowz 400 yardz!?!?!?!). Chavis rolled a significant number of faces into the game, something which can be used to keep us fresh and dangerous. Stopping a well-designed blitz can be tough. Stopping a well-designed blitz coming from a guy with fresh legs is near impossible. I applaud Chavis for giving different looks.

-This defense has speed, but can't tackle well (yet). The team can get there, now they just need to finish the job off.

-Speaking of, since Chavis is baring the criticism right now, take away a couple blown coverages (I put both of these on the players) and we're coming out of this one with a dominating defensive performance.

-Why do UNC fans hate T.J. Yates? For the life of me, he looks like an entirely serviceable QB, who plays heady, safe football. What am I missing here?

-If this game is any indication, we're going to be rolling with a heavy dose of Ridley, some sprinkled in Shep and very little Murphy as our RB trio.

-Jheraine Boyd can fucking play.

-Watching Boyd burn us was painful, but seeing Pianalto pick apart the middle of our D was just twisting a knife in the wound. Our LBs have a long, long ways to go coverage wise. UNC spent most of their day picking apart underneath holes in the zone or getting a TE matched up one and one and beating us.

-T-Bob played most of the game at RG, but I hope we don't just "give" him the nod. Frankly, he's just not strong enough. T-Bob plays with a lot of heart, but he just doesn't have the power to drive people off the football. I'd love to see Greg Shaw or even Chris Faulk get a look there. The rest of the OL looked fairly stout. We consistently got a much better initial push in this game than any game I remember last year. Hurst struggled a bit, particularly with super quickly Coples coming on the inside. Coples also bitch-slapped Josh Williford in the one series I saw him in at RG, so that was short lived.

-Shep is going to be a lot of fun to watch all year.

-I thought Crowton called a pretty good game. Mostly mental errors killed our drives. We were in position in just about every drive we had to really do some work, unfortunately we struggled to close nearly all of them off. Even still, I saw an explosive, big play potential from this offense that I never saw last year. GC really does design some beautiful plays. My favorite are his running plays where he gets the traffic moving one way, opening a cut back lane for the RB to hit and rip off a nice one.

-This was one of the weirdest games I've ever watched. The game was never in doubt until literally the last 3 minutes. Such an odd thing. I remember in real time thinking they don't have a chance in hell, only to 2 minutes later be agonizing over a potential go-ahead score. Shit, even on their drive to cut the lead to 6, they were making penalties, fumbling snaps, getting stuffed etc. It's not like they ever really generated a consistent offensive attack... they just made a play here and there to move the ball.

-We dominated 3 3/4 of a game in my eyes. But that's not 4 quarters, so there's a lot of room to grow.

The Scores:

1st TD: Step 1 in the JJ Maturation Process: "The Red Zone." He stood tall in the pocket, stepped into the pressure and delivered a dart to a tightly covered Shep for 6. Shep made a nice hands grab, particularly after dropping an earlier ball.

2nd TD: As I mentioned above, Crowton can really design up some sexy plays. On this TD, take a look at it again and notice the LT and LG. Both are pulling to the right. For a DE, your read there is to collapse down the line, assuming the play is going to the right. Instead, we're bringing Shep back across the formation with some misdirection. The combination of Shep's speed and the flow of the defense going the opposite way left a wide open field to exploit. Untouched. Beauty.

 

3rd TD: Patrick Peterson. Amen.

4th TD: Step 2 in the JJ maturation process: "The Deep Ball." Another one of those moments where JJ steps up into the pocket, buying just enough time for Randle to get into his route before launching a near perfect pass, hitting Randle in stride for 6. JJ has struggled with his deep ball for as long as we all can remember, but this was truly a beautiful toss.

The Boys:

JJ: Good game. Made a couple horrible decisions, retreating away from the pocket rather than stepping up through it, both of which ultimately cost us (once with a meaningless INT and the other time with a grounding penalty that cost us a shot at a FG). Overall though, I'm encouraged. He generally looked confident, assertive and aware. We got in and out of huddles in a timely fashion. He took little things the defense gave him.

Ridley: First of all, putting the ball on the deck twice is unacceptable. In my eye, I bench him next week in lieu of a younger guy just to let him know that you don't ever drop my fucking football, much less when the game is on the line. His first fumble was an effort fumble, the second was purely sloppy and at a crucial moment. He should have had a TD, which came back on a blown holding call against T-Bob. But for just straight up running it, Ridley looked very good. Quicker than last year, more explosive and running with attitude. You can see the hard work he put in.

Murphy: 3 touches, 2 yards, 1 fumble. I'm rooting for the kid, but you can't help but believe his return won't be as triumphant as he hopes. I won't give up on him after one game, but that type of performance does little to give coach's confidence.

Stamp: Saw him a couple times absorbing rather than initiating. Little disappointed considering his MO for wrecking facemasks. However, running game was better, so he must have been doing some damage when in.

Shep: Solid game. Dropped an early pass that should have kept the drive alive. Wasn't a great throw, but it was catch-able and he just didn't reel it in. Dropped another where he was dominated by Bruce Carter. This was a tougher catch, but one he needs to make if he wants to be a great one. Otherwise, looked great with the ball in his hands and served as an efficient decoy, including on Randle's long TD.

Randle: Looks like our best WR easily. He's just so smooth. Plucks the ball out of the sky effortlessly. Gets deep on the secondary. Great use of head fakes to get open. He recorded more than a third of his season's catch output from last year... on Saturday. The term "scary good" comes to mind.

Toliver: Wasn't a major factor. Caught one first down. Never really asserted himself in this game.

Joseph: Surprisingly finishes as the the no. 2 receiver on the night. Joseph played well and looked good running his routes. No slight on him, but I can't wait to watch DLO Peterson do what he did, because it will be even bigger gains.

Clement: Played quite a bit. Nothing stood out. Looked sloppy on a block and release that JJ ended up having to scramble for a minor gain.

Barksdale: The best news you can hear about your LT is no news. Didn't hear his name called once all night, which tells me he had it locked down. Pressure for JJ rarely came from his side. Took some time to watch him a few times and he looked great. Major upgrade from last year.

Dworaczyk: Much like JB, didn't hear much from him. He looks bigger and better. Left side of the line held it down all night, with several of the best runs coming off that side.

PJ: Played pretty well. Had a bad holding penalty late in the game. Snaps were all good. Anchored pretty well in the run game. Generated push up the middle to pick up some short yardage situations. Nothing else stands out as particularly bad.

T-Bob: Eh. Didn't exactly light the world on fire. He plays hard and you love that, but he just doesn't have the power to get it done. The holding penalty against him was a crime though.

Williford: Only other player I saw cycle in at RG. He looked good for 2 plays and then got absolutely blown up by Coples, dropping Ridley for a loss and ending a drive. He didn't go back in after that.

Hurst: Up and down game. He struggled with the speedy Coples a few times (albeit, he won't face many interior guys that quick). Anchored pretty well in pass pro. Struggled with some of the run blocking, which shocked me as I thought he was a true road grader.

Montgomery: Got a sack. Recorded a couple other tackles. His speed on the edge will make him a consistent threat, even if he's not getting sacks.

Adams: Didn't notice him much. Got some good pressure on a couple plays.

Levingston: No stats recorded. Saw him at the bottom of a few piles. Does a good job of eating up blockers and collapsing the hole.

Nevis: Wreaked havoc all night. Caused bad C play resulting in a safety. Got a sack. Got another TFL. This guy was a thorn in their side all night long and even when he didn't make a play, he was influencing a play.

Edwards/Ag: Nothing notable.

Downs: Got a nice sack on a stunt, flashing his explosiveness coming around wide and making the play. Well designed blitz from Chavis.

Brockers: I wish he would start next to Nevis, because he's our 2nd best DT. I saw him toss their Guard and Center backward multiple times, and even blow by them once for a beautiful TFL. This kid is gonna be a good one.

Mingo: Got good pressure on a few plays. Made a nice TFL on a running play that had no chance. Speed, speed, speed.

Sheppard: Up and down game. Missed a handful of tackles. Seemed to get beat in coverage a couple of times. Not his best game, but still finished with 10 tackles.

Minter: Looks great coming up as a run defender but struggles in coverage, looking lost on more than one occasion.

Francois: Okay game. Much like Minter, struggled in coverage. Needs to learn how to take on a block aggressively rather than just doing hand fighting. Flashed speed and coverage some, including the final play of the game.

Barrow: Got the late hit for being a little over aggressive, but I don't mind that much. Make mistakes playing fast and physical and I still think calls like that are stupid (even if technically correct). Also recovered the 2nd fumble of the game.

Peterson: Looked okay. Great as a returner, obviously. Battled cramping all night. Showed flashes of dynamic covering ability. Great coverage late but still got beat. Good coverage in end zone. (Why do we play 8 yards off with corners like this?) /rantover

Claiborne: Not his best game. Missed several tackles. Did force the first fumble. Burned deep by Boyd for that 97 yard TD (it may be that he was supposed to have safety help over the top, but I'm not sure that's on Tharold Simon as Simon comes at a weird angle, completely out of position).

Simon/Reid: Didn't notice either much. But they both played.

Taylor: Up and down game. He plays the game with a lot of aggressiveness and energy. Love the way he stalks the line and comes up in run support. Looked great in one-on-one coverage down the sideline, almost nabbing a pick. Got burned in the red zone by a simple wheel route. At times looked like an enforcer, but needs to put it together with better coverage next time.

Eugene/Loston: Jai made the big hit that knocked Boyd out of the game, which had to have aided our chances of coming out on top. Looked solid but not spectacular. The one time I remember seeing Loston he looked lost in coverage. Check that, I saw him lay some wood on the RB once, but other than that, quiet.

Mathieu: This kid played a lot and you can see why. He's gonna be a good one. Throws his body around fearlessly in run support, looked great on the blitz to cause the fumble that "should have sealed the game." He's got great speed and getting these early reps only means he can be a force later in the season.

Bryant: As mentioned above, he played more than I expected and looked pretty good. Aggressive on blitzes and solid in coverage. Need to see more to make a better judgment.

Brooks: Made a very nice kick return after they finally gave up on PP. Also made a nice read and tackle on a short passing play where he pulled off the LOS at the last second, disguising his blitz well, tracked down the short pass and stopped the WR in his tracks.

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good post.

I agree with about 98%. But that other two percent is pretty big.

I don’t see how you can say Crowton called a good game. That abortion that is our option play is inexcusable. It’s ineffective, but at least it doesn’t fool anyone. I have really grown to hate this offensive system Crowton has. And I am not one of those “off with their heads” fans.

I have a pretty consistent record here as being highly supportive of elements in LSU that typically receive a lot of criticism. This includes my support of Miles, who is a solid, though not great head coach — he has just enough batshit insanity to take risks that accidentally mock game theory effectiveness, and he can recruit like a fiend. And JJ is an above average quarterback, and I fear that much of the LSU fanbase’s dislike of him and longing for Lee, quite frankly, comes from the same people claiming Matt Flynn was better than JaMarcus, which was asinine, and probably stems more from the melanin content of their skin than their on field productivity* (just being honest here).

But Crowton’s performance over the past two years is absolutely inexcusably bad. He is not even a mediocre coordinator — at this point I long for mediocrity from the OC. How in the world can we have this much fucking talent and yet struggle to move the ball like we do? It boggles my mind. Give Boise State our firepower and they would score 40 points a game, game in and game out. I swear, if we got a decent high school OC, running a stripped down high school offense keeping it simple, with our talent we could crush people.

It’s not hard; when you have a lot of fast and scary talent you get the ball to people in open spaces and let them make plays. Why can’t we do this? It’s like we don’t even try! Instead we find plays that don’t seem to work very well in confined spaces, and keep running them. Again, that option play Crowton insists on running rarely get more than five yards, and puts JJ at unnecessary risk.

Crowton is the problem. Fire him tomorrow and retool this offense and the team will be immeasurable better by the fifth game. I know this won’t happen — Les is a loyal guy, which is simultaneously a good quality and a fault. But eventually something has to give. When you have this much firepower and struggle to move the ball then something has to give.

*This does not describe anyone on posting on ATVS that I am aware of, so I am not pointing any fingers here.

Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.
St. Louis vegetarian blog

by Gregatron on Sep 6, 2010 11:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Re: Option

I’m not sure I totally agree. I can totally agree that it is painful to watch, but as for it’s effectiveness, it worked somewhat. First, it helps to stretch the field wide. JJ looks more comfortable with the zone read stuff than the standard option. What he’s not good at is knowing when and how to pitch. But when he’s decisive and runs, he usually picks up about 5-6 yards. One play he would have had about 10-15 yards, but was shoe-laced. That being said, I wouldn’t be all that sad to see it removed from the playbook.

I’m reserving judgment on our inability to score points. We still scored 3 TDs in 1 half (We did this only once last year… against Tulane). Now, we laid an egg in the 2nd half, but we had a TD called back on a bad penalty and fumbles killed 3 of our drives on the other side of the 50. My point is: last year I would watch and say, “Oh my god, we physically cannot even move the ball.” Whereas this game I found myself saying, “Another stupid mistake costs us.” I’m not sure the mistakes were coaching inflicted either (though if the fumbles continue, Frank Wilson’s ability should be questioned).

Overall, I wasn’t angry with Gary’s game plan. A play call here and there weren’t the best, but nothing to make me froth at the mouth. We ran the ball at 4.3 ypc (would have been 4.9 if not for that late sack). JJ completed passes at 10 ypa (and even if you take out the 50 yard bomb, it was above 7). So something must have been going right? Compare that to numbers last year… we were consistently running in the 3.5 ypc range, with few games ever topping 4.0.

For now, I can chalk up the fumbles/penalties to first game mistakes (let’s not forget, it’s the first game!). What happened in the 4th quarter is unfortunate, but I don’t think we have to go into panic mode about the offense yet.

by Paul Crewe on Sep 6, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hope you are right.

I would love to be proven wrong. I am just bracing myself for another year of horrendous offence being the norm, and I’m not sure my liver can take it.

Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.
St. Louis vegetarian blog

by Gregatron on Sep 6, 2010 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not using speed

Lord knows I’m not a Crowton apologist, but is this team’s unbending desire to run the football, even against a team playing with a depleted secondary, might be more of Miles’ philosophy than anyone else. He loves to run the ball. He seems to want, more than anything, a power run game despite having all of the pieces there for an incredible passing game.

Maybe we should hire a passing game co-ordinator or something.

Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
And The Valley Shook!

by Poseur on Sep 6, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

97 yd TD

Watching the tape, the 97 yarder appeared to be Brandon Taylor’s fault. Taylor freezes in the deep zone and when the UNC QB scrambles, he takes off up the field after him… That’s two TDs on him this game. On another note, I have to disagree about Hurst in pass protection – he struggled mightly there as well.

As for Crowton, I hate his pass plays – its either all short, all medium, or all long – does he not know how to work multiple levels of the field and give JJ some options?

All said, I was furious with the game at first, but after rewatching it, while still being disappointed, I’m also excited – that is a TON of youngsters in the game and a lot of things we did do well. There is reason to be very optimistic about this season.

by Xanathol on Sep 6, 2010 12:05 PM CDT reply actions  

I noticed that too

But it’s so hard to tell defensive calls. Taylor looks like he freezes, but maybe he was supposed to play underneath zone and then realized the guy was going deep and stopped and turned to try and do something? Who knows. It definitely looked like he froze up though. There was obvious a blown coverage there.

Not a huge fan of Gary either, but I still don’t think his gameplan was terrible. I hated the deep pass we tried somewhere in the 2nd half where JJ overthrew everyone. I felt like it would have been better to try and grind out some more clock at that point, rather than going for one big TD.

by Paul Crewe on Sep 6, 2010 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Had the same thought

In the second half. That was the time to try and break UNC’s will with the power run game. If Ridley’s TD doesn’t get called back, would that have happened?

I was as critical of Crowton as anybody last year, but I have to say the fourth quarter drive that ended with the called-back Ridley TD was a very well-called drive I thought.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 6, 2010 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree on Brandon

Vinson was way on the right side of the D, so I doubt he was supposed to be helping Claiborne. He just got into the play because Taylor was so far out of it. Taylor was on that side and as far as I can tell, never looked at the receiver. He was locked on Yates for the entire rollout. Claiborne got burned on a nice stop and go move by Boyd.

Also agree on Hurst. The initial pressure on JJ’s interception and on the intentional grounding both came through T-Bob and Hurst. They both had horrible games in pass protection.

I was pleasantly surprised by the DL, both run D and pass rush, but the safeties really need to improve their play. Claiborne needs to step up as well or Mathieu is going to take his job.

I’m on the fence with Miles this season, but I really do think we need to go ahead and put Gonzales in place as offensive coordinator before we get into the meat of the SEC schedule. I’m also hoping Studrawa has a new employer after this year as well.

by The Bengal on Sep 6, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Re: Hurst

I can re-watch some tonight.

Overall, we had only one sack and that was due to a dumb decision by JJ. JJ typically had plenty of time to throw or a nice pocket to step into. Hurst didn’t have a great game by any means, but not horrible either.

by Paul Crewe on Sep 6, 2010 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

between this and the other post-game articles

I’m really loving the depth of analysis. I hope you guys can keep churning out this many quality articles all year

by ORtigerfan on Sep 6, 2010 12:21 PM CDT reply actions  

Crowton..

great at designing plays, but still doesn’t have an even good feel for calling them.

by Mikeno on Sep 6, 2010 1:06 PM CDT reply actions  

What happened

What happened is that our defense let Yates march down the field three times in a matter of minutes, as if we weren’t even there. JJ looked good. Ridley looked good. I support the 3rd QTR effort to get practice with the running game and manage the clock, maybe even get snaps into the depthchart, since after all the game was [supposed to be] done. Paul, I liked your article. Thanks for the courage to name names instead of the typical Miles/Crowton scapegoating. I agree with you – it’s the players who made the mistakes this time. And the refs didn’t help. I’m very dissappointed but also hopeful. Can’t wait for the next game.

by tomsmail on Sep 6, 2010 3:56 PM CDT reply actions  

Crowton

As an Oregon and LSU fan who’s now had to watch Crowton’s pitiful offenses for the past five years, I have to take exception with “I thought Crowton called a pretty good game.”

He can be the best playcaller in America and it wouldn’t make a difference if he can’t teach the players on the field how to execute them. The read-option, for example, isn’t a good play call if your quarterback hasn’t been taught how to run it.

If you want to see how an offense is supposed to be coordinated, watch any Oregon game from the past three years. The Ducks have exponentially less talent on offense than the Tigers, but because they have a competent offensive coordinator their players know how to execute the plays they’re given and, as a result, they didn’t finish 112th in the country in total offense last year.

It’s disgraceful that Crowton wasn’t fired in the offseason, and at this point the only person who can be blamed for the pathetic results on offense is Les.

by yssrn on Sep 6, 2010 5:03 PM CDT reply actions  

oregon isn't the only example.....

It is frustrating to see other teams w/ lesser talent execute better than we do. I think any number of offenses would have moved the ball all over the depleted UNC defense.

by Zandor435 on Sep 6, 2010 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Depleted is pretty harsh

Here’s some of the guys who played for UNC last night:

Coples (playing inside) – 4 stars
Paige-Moss – 5 stars
Tydreke Powell – 4 stars
Bruce Carter – 3 stars (stud)
Quan Sturdivant – 3 stars (stud)
Kevin Reddick – 3 stars
Jared McAdoo – 4 stars
Tre Boston – 4 stars

Obviously recruiting rankings aren’t the be all/end all, but we weren’t exactly up against garbage. UNC’s backups are more talented than Vandy’s starters….

by Paul Crewe on Sep 7, 2010 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah..

I think UNC’s depth is getting extremely underrated by the media and others but, with the weapons and depth at LSU’s disposal, they should have been able to accomplish more.

by Mikeno on Sep 7, 2010 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I wrote you....

A nice, long reply, but it’s now lost in cyberspace. I’m tired so I’m not going to write it again, but I will tomorrow.

Basic gist: look at the drive charts. We were moving it well during both of Ridley’s fumbles. We had a long, sustained drive killed by a bad holding penalty call.

I’m still waiting for someone to point out exactly what Crowton did that was so bad. Why was the game called so poorly to you guys?

by Paul Crewe on Sep 7, 2010 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think..

it had to do with going relatively conservative in the second half with only a 20 point lead.

by Mikeno on Sep 7, 2010 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Honestly

Working on the run game should have been the focus, because it was the single biggest problem from last year. But it didn’t feel like there was much of an effort to do that until the first drive of the 4th quarter.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 7, 2010 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think the lack of plays

plus the time of possession differential, plus the three and outs (or drives with only one first down), the abra cadabra dissappearing act our offense did in the third quarter, and the memory of last season, have left a lot of people with the feeling of “here we go again.” I have to admit that was my first reaction.

After rewatching the game, I think it wasn’t as terrible as it felt in real time. It didn’t help that Kirk and Brent checked out of the game when it looked to be a blow out and then couldn’t stop drooling over the prosect of a comeback by UNC. Those guys kind of ruined watching the game from my perspective.

by Displaced Tiger on Sep 7, 2010 7:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Here's my issue

From the LSU stats page, in the second half, we had 28 offensive plays: 19 runs, 5 third down passes and only 4 passes on 1st/2nd down. The turnovers were a huge problem, but the playcalling went way conservative as well.

by The Bengal on Sep 7, 2010 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Conservative

Wasn’t necessarily the bad way to go. But the emphasis should have been on trying to run them out of the building. Pound out long drives and wear them out — and that wasn’t really what Crowton tried to do.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 7, 2010 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's not just the calls

The entire scheme does not fit our skill people well. JJ is not a triple threat single wing throwback like Tim Tebow and he does not have Tebow’s endurance and strength either. When JJ gets 5 on a read option keeper I hear “see we can do it” and I’m thinking “WHY are we doing it.” Any play that JJ has enough room to gain 5 yards RS might take to the house. It’s the reason the single wing went out of fashion in major college FB. It was never really solved or stopped. The irreplaceable tailback kept getting hurt and it’s damned hard to find those guys in the first place. Did you see Kellen Moore running option last night? Peterson would slash his wrists if he let Moore get hurt running that BS, and he has less playmakers outside then LSU. The pros don’t let the QB’s run it, except Vince Young and Mike Vick, who have had limited success and also got banged up.

If we don’t want to use them let’s stop recruiting them and use those schollies to get about a dozen Herb Tylers so we have enough to get through a whole SEC season.

But until we get those guys just have JJ or JL get the ball to the speed guys in space or hand it to a real runner, like Moore did last night and a few dozen other college QB’s do every week with offenses ranked ahead of ours. Then get out of the frickin way and if anyone hits you they’ll drop a flag.

And did you notice how NC went to the same plays over and over on the last drive? They were working so they kept using them. We finally stopped it with two good plays by Jai and Francois but they made us do it. It was their best chance and they took it. They just got beat. Crowton often just stops himself.

by pttigris on Sep 7, 2010 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

JJ just not an option runner

He can gain yards on a zone-read, a dive, a draw, or just on a scramble. But he’s clearly not comfortable making the pitch read.

Crowton doesn’t seem to realize that there are other ways to take advantage of a QB’s mobility besides the option.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 7, 2010 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

The running game did look improved against a good NC defense despite the losses,

but I can remember three instances of third and short or second and short—maybe there were more—and you knew we were going to run it right up the middle. I was having flash backs to Curly days—you gotta establish your running game as he used to say or something along those lines. These are the opportunities we need to take advantage of with our skill players—at least mix it up.

by mjtig on Sep 7, 2010 1:17 PM CDT reply actions  

There has to be a committment

And it can’t be just out of the spread (especially not with the bigger backs). There has to be a power element to it.

by Billy Gomila on Sep 7, 2010 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Others do it...

UNC offensive coordinator put a plan together that fit the situation, i.e. short slants underneath our coverage with a quarterback who could deliver.
Boise State had a plan for their last series that took them into the end zone, i.e. outside routes to embrace the sideline, freeze the clock and then drop one in the middle, and again with a quarterback that could deliver.

I think JJ can deliver on these simple routes. Why can’t Crowton just copy one of these plans? It all seems so damn complicated and even Les seems so confused about it all. See POSEUR’s Coach Speak.

by ettoi on Sep 7, 2010 3:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about LSU Tigers. Best viewed in Wide mode

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Lsuavatar_small
ESPN: Jordan Jefferson questions game plan
Small
Show the top 2013 QB some Tiger Love, Follow him on Twitter
Lsuavatar_small
Rabalais: Liggins breaks QB mold
Small
AL fan Downing's lawyers: "ain't no crime, he was just joshin'"
Small
DeAngelo Peterson and the National Championship
Small
Miles and QBs
Small
Don: Boone is Staying
Small
1958 vs 2011
76224_20070106130217_small
I knew Les was stubborn, but wow...
Small
2012 cornerbacks

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

13 - 10

Conference

3 - 6

Lost 1


Managing Editor / Chief Lackey

Pb140006_small PodKATT

Editors

Gse_multipart30441_small Richard Pittman

Me_and_beer_small Poseur

Tower_small Billy Gomila

Paulcrewe_small Paul Crewe

Authors

Mike_snow_small actioncuse